CCJS100 Exam 2 Court Cases

studied byStudied by 10 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

20 Terms

1

Tennessee v. Garner (1985)

use of deadly force by law enforcement is unconstitutional against unarmed and non-dangerous fleeing suspects

New cards
2

Terry v. Ohio (1968)

Stop and frisk on suspects is allowed if there is reasonable suspicion that they are armed and involved in criminal activity

New cards
3

Chimel v. California (1969)

allows warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested

New cards
4

United States v. Drayton (2002)

police officers are not required to inform people of their right to decline to be searched when police ask for consent to search

New cards
5

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

suspects in custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to be represented during questioning (5th and 6th amendment rights

New cards
6

Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010)

Suspects must invoke their right to remain silent during police interrogation

New cards
7

Weeks v. United States (1914)

applied the exclusionary rule as the remedy for improper searches by federal law enforcement officials

New cards
8

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

applied the exclusionary rule as the remedy for improper searches by state and local officials

New cards
9

Strickland v. Washington (1984)

show that defendant had ineffective counsel by proving attorney committed errors that effected the outcome of the case

New cards
10

United States v. Salerno and Cafero (1987)

Upheld Bail Reform Act of 1984 to prevent people from committing crimes while on bail

New cards
11

Boykin v. Alabama (1969)

Before a judge may accept a plea of guilty, defendants must state that they are making the plea voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently understanding the consequences of the plea

New cards
12

North Carolina v. Alford (1970)

A plea of guilty by a defendant who maintains their innocence may be accepted for the purpose of a lesser sentence

New cards
13

Missouri v. Frye (2012)

Defense attorneys are obligated to inform their clients about plea agreement offers made by the prosecutor and are protected against ineffective counsel

New cards
14

Williams v. Florida (1970)

Juries of fewer than 12 members are constitutional (as a little as 6)

New cards
15

Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968)

Those who strongly oppose the death penalty with no exception can be removed through voir dire

New cards
16

Furman v. Georgia (1972)

The death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment (unconstitutional)

New cards
17

Gregg v. Georgia (1976)

reinstated the death penalty as constitutional if bifurcated proceedings occur (trial and punishment phase)

New cards
18

McCleskey v. Kemp (1987)

rejected a challenge of Georgia’s death penalty on grounds of racial discrimination

New cards
19

Atkins v. Virginia (2002)

Execution of developmentally disabled offenders is unconstitutional

New cards
20

Roper v. Simmons (2005)

execution for crimes committed while under the age of 18 is unconstitutional

New cards
robot