Thinking and Decision-making ERQ

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/22

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

23 Terms

1
New cards

What is thinking and decision-making?

A cognitive process used to solve problems, analyze situations, and make decisions.

2
New cards

What is the Dual Process Model?

A theory proposing that two systems of thinking (System 1 and System 2) interact in decision-making.

3
New cards

What is System 1 thinking?

Fast, automatic, intuitive, low-effort, unconscious, and prone to biases.

4
New cards

What is System 2 thinking?

Slow, deliberate, logical, high-effort, conscious, and more accurate.

5
New cards

What biases is System 1 prone to?

Anchoring bias and framing effects, leading to errors in judgment.

6
New cards

What was the aim of Alter & Oppenheimer (2007)?

To investigate how disfluency affects thinking and decision-making.

7
New cards

What was the procedure of Alter & Oppenheimer’s study?

  • Participants answered CRT questions in either easy-to-read or hard-to-read font conditions.

8
New cards

What were the results of Alter & Oppenheimer’s study?

Hard-to-read font group answered more accurately; easy-font group relied on intuitive (System 1) answers.

9
New cards

How does Alter & Oppenheimer support the Dual Process Model?

Disfluency triggered System 2 thinking, improving accuracy and reducing cognitive bias.

10
New cards

What is a strength of Alter & Oppenheimer’s study?

High internal validity and clear evidence for System 1 vs. System 2.

11
New cards

What is a limitation of Alter & Oppenheimer’s study?

Low ecological validity and small sample size (40 participants).

12
New cards

What was the aim of Tversky & Kahneman (1974)?

To investigate how anchoring bias affects thinking.

13
New cards

What was the procedure of their anchoring bias study?

Participants estimated a math problem with numbers presented in ascending or descending order.

14
New cards

What were the results of Tversky & Kahneman’s study?

High anchors led to higher estimates; low anchors led to lower estimates.

15
New cards

What does this study show about System 1? (T&K)

Intuitive thinking is influenced by initial values, causing anchoring bias.

16
New cards

What is a limitation of the Tversky & Kahneman study?

Low ecological validity and doesn't account for individual differences like expertise.

17
New cards

How does the Dual Process Model apply to consumer behavior?

System 1 influences impulse buying and anchoring effects in pricing.

18
New cards

How does anchoring bias affect consumer decisions?

High discounts seem more appealing due to automatic System 1 processing.

19
New cards

What are the practical applications of understanding this model?

Helps individuals make better decisions by engaging System 2 thinking.

20
New cards

Why is the Dual Process Model considered reductionist (limitation)?

It oversimplifies complex cognitive processes by dividing them into two systems.

21
New cards

How does the model neglect emotional influences?

It overlooks how emotions can activate or override both systems.

22
New cards

What is problematic about fixed characteristics in the model?

Assumes System 1 is always fast and System 2 always slow, ignoring the role of experience or training.

23
New cards

Why is the idea of systems being strictly separate a limitation?

In real life, thinking is dynamic, and both systems may interact or operate simultaneously.