AP GOVERNMENT Vocab Unit 7: 1-33

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 18 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/32

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

33 Terms

1
New cards

appellate jurisdiction

the authority of a court to hear and review decisions made by lower courts in that system

2
New cards

senatorial courtesy

Presidential custom of submitting the names of prospective appointees for approval to senators from the states in which the appointees are to work.

3
New cards

writ of certiorari

A formal writ used to bring a case before the Supreme Court.

4
New cards

rule of four

At least four justices of the Supreme Court must vote to consider a case before it can be heard

5
New cards

solicitor general

A presidential appointee and the third-ranking office in the Department of Justice. The solicitor general is in charge of the appellate court litigation of the federal government.

6
New cards

amicus curiae brief

a brief filed by someone who is not a party to a case in an attempt to persuade the Court to agree with the arguments set forth in the brief

7
New cards

stare decisis

the practice of letting a previous legal decision stand

8
New cards

judicial restraint

a philosophy of constitutional interpretation that asserts justices should be cautious in overturning laws

9
New cards

judicial activism

a philosophy of constitutional interpretation that justices should wield the power of judicial review, sometimes creating bold new policies

10
New cards

class action suits

Lawsuits permitting a small number of people to sue on behalf of all other people similarly situated.

11
New cards

original jurisdiction

the authority of a court to hear a case first, which includes the finding of facts in the case

12
New cards

district courts

the lowest federal courts; federal trials can be held only here

13
New cards

courts of appeal

Appellate courts empowered to review all final decisions of district courts, except in rare cases. In addition, they also hear appeals to orders of many federal regulatory agencies.

14
New cards

precedents

a judicial decision that guides future courts in handling similar cases

15
New cards

judicial implementation

How and whether court decisions are translated into actual policy, thereby affecting the behavior of others. The courts rely on other units of government to enforce their decisions.

16
New cards

political questions

A doctrine developed by the federal courts and used as a means to avoid deciding some cases, principally those involving conflicts between the president and Congress.

17
New cards

statutory construction

The judicial interpretation of an act of Congress. In some cases where statutory construction is an issue, Congress passes new legislation to clarify existing laws.

18
New cards

Marbury v. Madison

a Supreme Court decision that established judicial review over federal laws

19
New cards

McCulloh v. Maryland

Supreme Court decision that (1819) established the supremacy of the national govt. over state governments.

20
New cards

Schenck v. U.S.

A United States Supreme Court decision concerning the question of whether the defendant possessed a First Amendment right to free speech against the draft during World War I. Ultimately, the case served as the founding of the "clear and present danger" rule. [1st Amendment not applied to clear and present danger]

21
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education

1954 - The Supreme Court overruled Plessy v. Ferguson, declared that racially segregated facilities are inherently unequal and ordered all public schools desegregated. [Equal protection clause]

22
New cards

Engel v. Vitale

The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren. [1st Amendment, Establishment Clause, separation of Church and state]

23
New cards

Baker v. Carr

case that est. one man one vote. this decision created guidelines for drawing up congressional districts and guaranteed a more equitable system of representation to the citizens of each state [Equal protection clause]

24
New cards

Gideon v. Wainwright

A person who cannot afford an attorney may have one appointed by the government [6th amendment - the right to counsel]

25
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines

The case that ruled that students do not lose Constitutional rights when they entered the building but they can be limited if they cause a disruption [Free speech, freedom of expression]

26
New cards

New York Times Co. v. U.S.

If the government wishes to censor information before it is printed or published, it must be proven in court that the information will endanger national security. [1st amendment right to free press against prior restraint]

27
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder

Amish do not have to attend school after 8th grade - right to freedom of religion

28
New cards

Roe v. Wade

The 1973 Supreme Court decision holding that a state ban on all abortions was unconstitutional. The decision forbade state control over abortions during the first trimester of pregnancy, permitted states to limit abortions to protect the mother's health in the second trimester, and permitted states to protect the fetus during the third trimester. [Right to privacy, 14th Amendment]

29
New cards

Shaw v. Reno

NO racial gerrymandering; race cannot be the sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative boundaries; majority-minority districts. [Equal Protection Clause]

30
New cards

U.S. v. Lopez

Second Amendment - gun laws about schools not related to interstate commerce and not under federal authority; U.S. congress exceeded its authority under commerce clause

31
New cards

McDonald v. Chicago

The right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" protected by the 2nd Amendment is incorporated by the due process clause of the 14th Amendment and applies to the states.

32
New cards

Citizens' United v. FEC

A 2010 decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that independent expenditures are free speech protected by the 1st Amendment and so cannot be limited by federal law. Leads to creation of SuperPACs & massive rise in amount of third party electioneering (Citizens for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow)

33
New cards

Federalist No. 78

argument by Alexander Hamilton that the federal judiciary would be unlikely to infringe upon rights and liberties but would serve as a check on the other two branches