1/31
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Sutton Trust (explaining class differences)
(2011)
in a 3 year period
One public school alone sent 211 students to Oxbridge
While over 1,300 state schools sent 0
Bernstein (cultural deprivation)
(1975)
2 speech codes
Restricted code - WC, limited vocabulary, short sentences, grammatically incorrect, gestures or 1 word, context-bound
Elaborated code - MC, wide vocabulary, complex sentences, analytic, context-free
Douglas
(1964)
WC pan rest placed less value on education
Less ambitious for their children
Gave them less encouragement
Take less interest in education
Result = children had lower levels of motivation and achievement
Sugarman
(1970)
WC subculture has 4 key features that act as a barrier to educational achievement
Fatalism - ‘whatever will be will be’, leaves life to fate
Collectivism - being a part of a group and not individual e.g. lads
Immediate gratification - seeking pleasure now rather than waiting for future, better rewards
Present time orientation - not looking to the furniture and now having long-term goals or plans
Becker
ideal pupil - highly motivated, intelligent and well-based which is mostly MC pupils
Rosenthal and Jacobsen
self-fulfilling prophecy
Gillborn and Youdell
Streaming and the A-C economy
sudy of London school shows how teachers use stereotypical notions of ‘ability’ to stream pupils
Found that teachers are less likely to see WC and black pupils as having ability to
Placed in lower streams/entered for the lower-tier GCSE’s
Denies them knowledge and opportunity
Widens the gap in achievement
Ball
study of a comprehensive that was in the process of abolishing banding (form of streaming)
In favour of teaching mixed ability groups
Found that when school abolished banding - the basis of how subcultures formed, anti school subcultures declined
However labelling continues
Better labelling = better results
Archer et al
interactions between WC pupils identities and school
And how this produces underachievement
symbolic capital - the status , recognition and sense of worse that we are able to obtain from others
Bourdieu
Habitus - a social class’ way of thinking and acting e.g. lifestyles and expectations
DfES
only 23% of white boys FSM gained 5 A*-C grades at GCSEs
¾ girls passed GCSEs at grade 4+ but boys 1/3 passed with grade 4+
Sewell
The reason for black boys underachievement is due to a lack of fatherly nurturing or ‘tough love’ e.g. firm, fair, non-abusive, respectful
Results in boys finding it hard to overcome emotional and behaviour difficulties in adolescence
Street gangs of other fatherless boys offer black boys ‘perserve loyalty and love’
Gillborn and Mirza
black children were the highest achievers on entry to primary school
Yet at GCSE - had the worst results of any ethnic group - 21 points below average
Gillborn and Youdell
teachers had ‘radicalised expectations’ that black pupils would pose more disciplinary problems
McRobbie
girls magazine
70s promoted getting married, and not being ‘left in the shelf’
Now promotes assertive, independent women
Sharpe
interviews with girls
70s - low aspirations, education = unfeminine, priorities order = love, marriage, husband, children, job, career
90s - ambitions changed, order = careers, being able to support themselves/Independent woman with a career
National curriculum
1988 the government removed one source of gender inequality made girls and boys study mostly the same subjects
Mitsos and Browne
girls were more successful in coursework - due to conscientious and better organisation
Girls spend more time on work, more care, meet deadlines, right equipment
decline in male employment opportunities has led to an identity crisis for men
Now many boys believe they have little prospect of getting a proper job
Therefore they give up trying
Murphy and Elwood
boys and girls develop different tastes in reading
Boys = hobby books and information texts
Girls = stories about people
Explains why boys prefer science, and girls prefer English
Mac an Ghail
Male gaz
The Tripartite System
Education Reform Act
1988 introduced by conservative government - coursework/GCSEs and national curriculum
Gewirtz
Study of 14 London secondary schools
3 main types of parents:
Privileged-skilled choosers - professional MC who can manipulate the system
Disconnected-local choosers - WC parents who lack capital and less able to manipulate the system
Semi-skilled choosers - WC parents who were ambitious for their child and relied on other people opinions or the schools
Academies Act
Durkheim
Socialisation and social solidarity
Parsons
School acts as a bridge between family and society
Davis and Moore
Role allocation
Chubb and Moe
Education vouchers and Parentocracy
Althusser
Reproduction of social inequality - schools set up WC for failure
Legitimisation of social inequality - MC has access to capital
Bowles and Gintis
Correspondence principal - schools mirror the world of work e.g. lack of control, discipline and consequences, obedience
Myth of meritocracy - education claims to be fair but it is untrue
Willis
learning to labour
lads reject school, have a laugh, resist schools norms and values
end up in wc jobs