AP GOV - Final

studied byStudied by 39 people
5.0(1)
Get a hint
Hint

Barren v Baltimore 1833

1 / 400

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Government

401 Terms

1

Barren v Baltimore 1833

  • Prior to Incorporation Doctrine - states were not subject to Bill of Rights

  • Destroyed Wharf not compensated

New cards
2

Gitlow v New York 1925

  • Beginning of Incorporation Doctrine

  • “Clear and Imminent” danger for restricting Free Speech

  • Socialist Manifesto guy

New cards
3

Terry v Ohio 1968

  • “Stop and Frisk” Doctrine

  • Do not need probable cause to frisk on street from reasonable suspicion

New cards
4

California v Greenwood 1988

  • Trash Case

  • Expectation of Privacy - any place a reasonable person does not deem as private is not

New cards
5

Weeks v United States 1914

  • Police search house w/ out warrant and find gambling evidence

  • Formation of “exclusionary rule” - evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in a court of law

  • Seizure of items without a warrant & probable cause illegal

New cards
6

Wolf v Colorado 1949

  • Exclusionary Rule not applicable to state courts

  • Encouraged states to follow, however

  • Conspired to perform abortions

New cards
7

Mapp v Ohio 1961

  • Search of home without a warrant - found obscene books

  • States made subject to Exclusionary Rule

  • Overturned Wolf v Colorado 1949

New cards
8

Nix v Williams 1984

  • Missing girl confession w/ out lawyer present

  • “Inevitable discovery” exception to Exclusionary Rule

  • Illegally obtained evidence that would have been obtained regardless of legal methods can be used in court

New cards
9

Herring v United States 2009

  • Cops thought there was a warrant (there wasn’t), found drugs on him

  • Exclusionary Rule not applicable when in “Good Faith”

  • Not due to law enforcement negligence

New cards
10

New Jersey v TLO 1985

  • Girl caught smoking, principal searches purse

  • Schools only need “Reasonable Suspicion” to search bags and students

  • No warrant or probable cause needed

New cards
11

Stafford v Redding 2009

  • Called into question extent of student searches (iBuprofen case)

  • 1) Inception - reasonable suspicion related to scope

  • 2) Vulnerability

  • 3) Immediacy of Contraband

New cards
12

Miller v United States 1939

  • Unregistered sawed-off shotgun

  • 2nd Amendment does not protect possession of any and every firearm

  • Ownership of firearms for the sake of efficiency or preserved militia protected

New cards
13

DC v Heller 2008

  • DC ban on handguns

  • Individual right to bear arms protected

  • Handgun bans unconstitutional

  • Reasonable times of self-defense

New cards
14

McDonald v Chicago 2010*

  • Second Amendment applicable to states

  • Right to defend oneself with a firearm

New cards
15

Kelo v New London 2005

  • Taking private property for economic benefit is constitutional under the 5th Amendment

New cards
16

Dred Scott v Sanford 1857

  • Slave taken into free state and then back

  • Slaves are not citizens

  • Slaves are not entitled to rights of the constitution

New cards
17

Plessy v Ferguson 1896

  • Challenge segregation on trains

  • “Separate but Equal” Doctrine

  • Upheld segregation laws

New cards
18

Brown v Board of Education 1954*

  • Overturned “Separate but Equal” Doctrine

New cards
19

Brown v Board of Education II 1955

  • Overturning of separate but equal enforced

  • Public schools required to desegregate with “deliberate speed”

New cards
20

Korematsu v United States 1944

  • Held that Japanese internment camps were constitutional under the guise of national security

New cards
21

Reed v Reed 1971

  • Son commits suicide - only men can be administrators

  • Arbitrary gender-based discrimination unconstitutional

  • 1st case of equal protection clause used for women

New cards
22

Tinker v Des Moines 1969*

  • Armbands for Vietnam

  • Student’s right to free speech protected so long as it does not cause substantial disruption

New cards
23

Loving v Virginia 1967

  • Interracial couple married in DC - against Virginia laws

  • Interracial marriage allowed

  • Laws against interracial marriage unconstitutional

New cards
24

Boy Scouts v Dale 2000

  • Gay employee not wanted b/c doesn’t align with Christian values

  • Right to freedom of expressive association

  • Discrimination based on sexuality allowed due to “aligning with values”

New cards
25

Obergefell v Hodges 2015

  • State refused to recognize gay marriage on death certificate

  • Same-sex right to marriage protected & recognized under 14th Amendment

New cards
26

Lawrence v Texas 2003

  • Police barge in on charges of sodomy

  • Invalidated sodomy laws

  • Consensual, adult same-sex sex protected

New cards
27

Regents of California v Bakke 1978*

  • Affirmative Action continued, but with limitations

  • Race cannot be used to meet a quota, but can be a factor accounted for in diversity

New cards
28

Adarand v Pena 1995

  • Government racial classifications subject to strict scrutiny (must serve compelling government interest)

  • Government interest must be narrowly tailored

New cards
29

Michigan Cases (Gratz v Bollinger 2003 & Grutter v Bollinger 2003)

  • Points given for race unconstitutional

  • Using race as a factor in admissions process is consitutional

New cards
30

Furman v Georgia 1972

  • Robbery accidental shooting

  • Ruled that the death penalty, as applied, violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

  • Temporarily stopped death penalty until states could prove it was no longer being used flippantly

New cards
31

North Carolina v Woodson 1976

  • Drunk Store Robbery

  • Death Penalty for First Degree Murder Unconstitutional

  • Aggravating factors must be considered

New cards
32

Gregg v Georgia 1976

  • Car Murder

  • Reinstated the death penalty in the United States. Introduced the "guided discretion" approach, allowing states to create specific criteria for death penalty cases.

New cards
33

Roe v Wade 1973*

  • Legalized abortion in the United States. Established a woman's constitutional right to privacy, which includes the right to terminate a pregnancy.

New cards
34

Connecticut v Griswold 1965

  • Struck down a law banning the use of contraceptives. Established a right to privacy within marital relationships.

New cards
35

Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992

  • Affirming the constitutional right to abortion. Established the "undue burden" standard, allowing states to regulate abortion as long as they don't create an "undue burden" on a woman's right to choose. Overturned parts of Roe v. Wade, but upheld the core principle of reproductive autonomy.

New cards
36

Dobbs v Jackson 2022

  • Overturned Roe v Wade

New cards
37

Gideon v Wainwright 1963*

  • Established the right to legal counsel for all individuals accused of a crime, even if they cannot afford one.

New cards
38

Escobedo v Illinois 1964

  • Right to counsel during police interrogation. Defendant requested attorney, but was denied. Supreme Court held that denial violated 6th Amendment.

  • Established the Escobedo rule for custodial interrogations.

New cards
39

Miranda v Arizona 1966

  • Established the "Miranda rights." Requires police to inform suspects of their right to remain silent and have an attorney present during interrogation. Protects against self-incrimination.

New cards
40

Buckley v Valeo 1976

  • Established campaign finance regulations. Ruled that limiting campaign spending is constitutional, but limiting campaign contributions is a violation of free speech.

New cards
41

Citizens United v FEC 2010*

  • Allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited money on political campaigns, under the protection of the First Amendment.

New cards
42

Indiana Democratic Party v Rokita + Crawford v Marion County Election Board

  • ID Required to vote

New cards
43

Schenk v United States 1919*

  • Upheld Espionage Act

  • Freedom of Speech less in time of war

New cards
44

Abrams v United States 1919

  • Pamphlets anti-World War 1

  • Upheld Espionage Act even further

  • “Clear and Present Danger”

New cards
45

Brandenburg v Ohio 1969

  • KKK

  • “Clear and Imminent Danger”

New cards
46

Yates v United States 1957

  • Communist advocating overthrow of government

  • Political speech does not equal incitement of violence

  • Upheld “Clear and Present Danger”

New cards
47

Roth v United States 1957

  • "Roth test" for obscenity

  • Obscene if if appeals to those with excessive sexual interest or provides nothing to society

New cards
48

Miller v California 1973

  • Obscene if lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value

  • Miller Test

New cards
49

Texas v Johnson 1989

  • Burning of flag is protected expression

  • Speech Plus

New cards
50

United States v Eichman 1990

  • Upheld Texas v Johnson

  • Speech Plus

New cards
51

Snyder v Phelps 2011

  • Military funeral case

  • Speech made in public on a matter of public concern is free speech

New cards
52

Bethel v Fraser 1986

  • Class president case

  • Schools can discipline students for using lewd or indecent language during school-sponsored events, even if it is considered political speech

  • Free speech in schools have limits

New cards
53

Morse v Frederick 2007

  • Free Speech limited by encouraging illegal activity

  • "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" banner held to be disruptive, not protected by the First Amendment.

New cards
54

Near v Minnesota 1931

  • Established prior restraint limits on freedom of the press

  • Government cannot censor or prohibit publication of information unless it poses a clear and present danger to national security. Protects the First Amendment rights of journalists and prevents government interference in free speech.

  • Can punish after publication

New cards
55

New York Times v United States 1971*

  • Established strict standard for prior restraint on publication, protecting freedom of the press.

  • Pentagon Papers case

New cards
56

New York Times v Sullivan 1964

  • MLK advertisement case

  • Established the 'actual malice' standard for defamation of public officials. Protected freedom of speech and press under the First Amendment.

  • Set a higher burden of proof for public figures to win defamation suits.

New cards
57

Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier 1988

  • Divorce & Teen pregnancy school paper

  • Allowed school officials to censor student-written articles in school-sponsored publications if they have reasonable educational justifications

New cards
58

Engle v Vitale 1962*

  • State-sanctioned prayer in public schools unconstitutional under First Amendment’s Establishment Clause

New cards
59

Abington v Shempp 1963

  • Ruling that mandatory Bible readings in public schools violated the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.

New cards
60

Epperson v Arkansas 1968

  • Ruling that banned state laws prohibiting the teaching of evolution in public schools. Upheld the principle of separation of church and state.

New cards
61

Lemon v Kurtzman 1971

  • Established the Lemon Test to determine the constitutionality of government aid to religious schools. The test requires that the government's action must have a secular purpose, should not advance or inhibit religion, and should not result in excessive entanglement between government and religion.

New cards
62

Wallace v Jaffree 1985

  • Ruled Alabama's moment of silence law unconstitutional due to its religious intent.

New cards
63

Agostini v Felton 1997

  • Allowed public funds to be used for educational services in religious schools, as long as it was part of a broader program and not solely for religious purposes.

New cards
64

Greece v Galloway 2014

  • Ruled that town council's practice of opening meetings with prayer did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment

New cards
65

Burwell v Hobby Lobby 2014

  • Allowed closely-held corporations to claim religious exemptions from certain healthcare provisions under the Affordable Care Act (providing birth control)

  • Hobby Lobby proved legitimate needs of religion (close on Sunday)

New cards
66

Wisconsin v Yoder 1972*

  • Ruled that Wisconsin's compulsory school attendance law violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

  • Amish case (compelling public interest outweighed by legitimate needs of religion)

New cards
67

Employment Division of Oregon v Smith 1990

  • Religious beliefs don't excuse individuals from following laws, even if it conflicts with their faith.

  • Tripping at rehab facility case

New cards
68

Gonzales v UDV 2006

  • Federal government cannot prohibit the use of hallucinogenic tea in religious ceremonies, under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

  • Brazilian religion in NM case (compelling public interest outweighed by legitimate needs of religion)

New cards
69

Political Socialization

Process by which individuals acquire their political beliefs, attitudes, and values. It involves the influence of family, peers, education, media, and other social factors in shaping one's political outlook.

New cards
70

Political Efficacy

The belief in one's level of ability to influence political processes and bring about change through participation and engagement in the political system.

New cards
71

Political Ideology

A set of beliefs and values that shape one's views on social, economic, and political issues. It guides how individuals or groups understand and approach governance, power, and societal organization.

New cards
72

Political Culture

The shared beliefs, values, and attitudes that influence political behavior and shape the overall political system of a society. It reflects the norms and expectations regarding the role of government, citizens' participation, and the distribution of power within a country.

New cards
73

Public Policy

Laws, programs, legislation and any other forms of policy that influence the general public of the United States

New cards
74

Political Participation

Thel involvement of citizens in the political process, such as voting, protesting, and joining political organizations, to influence government decisions.

New cards
75

Formal Institutions

Established rules and regulations that govern social, economic, and political systems. They provide structure, enforce laws, and maintain order in society. Examples include government bodies, legal systems, and educational institutions.

New cards
76

Policymaking Institutions

Organizations or branches of government responsible for creating and implementing policies. Examples include the executive and legislative branches, as well as regulatory agencies. These institutions play a crucial role in shaping public policy and addressing societal issues.

New cards
77

Linkage Institutions

Institutions that connect citizens to the government and facilitate political participation, such as political parties, interest groups, media, and elections. They play a crucial role in shaping public opinion, influencing policy decisions, and providing avenues for individuals to express their concerns and preferences in a democratic society.

New cards
78

Pluralism

A political theory that recognizes diverse groups and their interests, advocating for the distribution of power and decision-making among multiple competing groups. It emphasizes the importance of a healthy competition and the ability of different groups to influence policy and shape society.

New cards
79

Hyperpluralism

A theory in political science that suggests excessive diversity of interest groups can lead to weakened government effectiveness and gridlock. Multiple groups or factions become so strong that the government cannot function effectively.

New cards
80

Class or Elite Theory

Power and influence are concentrated in the hands of a small, privileged group who make decisions and control resources. The masses have limited political participation and are subject to the decisions made by the elite (rich).

New cards
81

Neo-liberal

An economic and political ideology that promotes free-market capitalism, limited government intervention, and individual liberty. It advocates for deregulation, privatization, and reducing the role of the state in the economy. Neo-liberalism emphasizes the importance of competition, market efficiency, and globalization.

New cards
82

Neo-con

A political ideology characterized by advocating for strong foreign policy, support for free markets, and a belief in the spread of democracy through military intervention. (Anti-terrorism)

New cards
83

Social Conservative

A political ideology that emphasizes traditional values, moral principles, and social stability. Social conservatives often advocate for preserving traditional institutions, such as marriage and family, and resist social changes that challenge these values. They tend to support policies that promote religious freedom, pro-life stances, and limited government intervention in social issues.

New cards
84

Southern Democrat

Southern Democrats were known for their conservative views on issues like racial segregation and states' rights. They played a significant role in shaping the political landscape of the South during that time. Today they retain a more conservative stance on several issues compared to Northern Democrats.

New cards
85

Dixiecrat

Alternative term for Southern Democrats. Specific term for short-term political party formed in 1948 for Southern Democrats opposed to racial integration and civil rights.

New cards
86

New England Liberal

Refers to a political ideology prevalent in the New England region of the United States, characterized by progressive values, support for social welfare programs, and a focus on individual rights and civil liberties. New England Liberals often advocate for environmental conservation, gender equality, and accessible healthcare.

New cards
87

Blue Dog Democrat

A moderate or conservative member of the Democratic Party in the United States. They are known for their fiscally conservative and socially moderate positions.

New cards
88

Alien

A person who is not a U.S. citizen or national, including undocumented immigrants, residing in the United States. Aliens have varying legal statuses and may be authorized or unauthorized to live and work in the country.

New cards
89

Citizen

A member of a country who has legal rights and responsibilities, including voting and obeying laws. All persons born or naturalized in the United States.

New cards
90

Resident alien

A foreign individual who resides in a country legally but is not a citizen. They have legal permission to live and work in the country, but do not have the same rights and privileges as citizens (besides voting).

New cards
91

Enemy Combatant

A term used to classify individuals who are considered a threat to national security and are detained without trial or legal rights. Engages in hostilities for the opposing side of the United States in an armed conflict.

New cards
92

Refugee

A person who has been forced to leave their home country due to persecution, war, or violence. They seek safety and asylum in another country.

New cards
93

Jus Soli

A legal principle granting citizenship to individuals born within a country's territory, regardless of their parents' nationality.

New cards
94

Jus sanguinis

Citizenship by bloodline; nationality acquired through parent's nationality, regardless of place of birth.

New cards
95

Platform

A set of principles or goals that a political party or candidate supports and promotes. It outlines their stance on various issues and serves as a basis for their campaign and policy-making decisions. Platforms often cover topics such as the economy, social issues, healthcare, and foreign policy.

New cards
96

Plank

A specific proposal or position within a political party's platform that outlines their stance on a particular issue. They are often presented during conventions and used to attract voter support. “Plank” as a piece of political “platform”.

New cards
97

Nation

A politically organized territory, typically characterized by a common language, culture, and government, that exercises sovereignty and self-governance within its borders.

New cards
98

State

A political organization that exercises authority over a defined territory and its population, maintaining order, enforcing laws, and providing public services.

New cards
99

Country

A geographic area that is politically organized and is typically governed by a centralized government. It is inhabited by a group of people who share common culture, history, and language.

New cards
100

City-State

A sovereign state consisting of a city and its surrounding territory, functioning as an independent political entity.

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 4 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 21 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 21 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 1 person
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 6 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 31 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 6 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 674 people
... ago
5.0(4)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (63)
studied byStudied by 22 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (85)
studied byStudied by 14 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (183)
studied byStudied by 7 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (20)
studied byStudied by 1 person
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (34)
studied byStudied by 21 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (58)
studied byStudied by 17 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (58)
studied byStudied by 12 people
... ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (76)
studied byStudied by 452 people
... ago
5.0(7)
robot