1/79
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
epistemology
the study of the nature of knowledge
humans need to know where knowledge comes from so they can trace it back
platonic epistemology
says that knowledge is innate
learning is the development of ideas buried deep in the soul
plato
plato
believed that each soul existed before birth with and a perfect knowledge of everything
we're born with knowledge (innately)
our soul existed before birth
when something is ‘learned' it is actually ‘recalled’
aristotle epistemology
there are no innate ideas: we know things through experience/ observation
the most reliable way to use knowledge is throguh observation and experience
rationalism
there are innate ideas
the senses are poor, unreliable means to knowledge
the most reliable mean to gain knowledge and truth is via a priori reason and introspect
which philosophers represent the theory of rationalism
parmenides?
plato
augustine
auselm
descartes
spinoza
leibnitz
empiricism
there are no innate ideas
the senses are a reliable, indeed the only means to knowledge
a priori reasoning is fine as dar as it goes but it is very limited as to what it can provide us in the way of knowledge
the most reliable way to useful knowledge is through observation and experience
aristotle
which philosophers represent empiricism
heraclitus?
aristotle
aquinas
locke
berkley
hume
Descartes
“i think therefore i am"
he wondered if the world was real
he knows he exists which is proof that it is
Rousseau (check pp)
"“Everything is good as it comes from the hands of the Maker of the world
but degenerates once it gets into the hands of man.”
a form of rationalism
believes that we already have ethical principles and ways to be good
Locke (check pp)
“Children are born with minds as blank as slates, but they have natural inclinations
which include personalities, likes and dislikes. For Locke, educating children, then,
entails instructing their minds and molding their natural tendencies.”
we're born with the structures to incorporate info into (blank slate doesnt mean born with nothing)
theory of child development
• “An organized set of ideas that is designed to explain and make
predictions about development”
foundational theories of child development - how did it start?
17th century England used children for chimney sweeping (job for children of poor parents)
there were no worker unions protecting their rights
worked in terrible conditions: had nothing they needed to develop in a normal way
social, physical, emotional development were stunted
this is what got people thinking about child development
Progress in Western science had merged with growing
concerns about children’s welfare to bring about the first
Western scientific theories of child development
• There are many different theories about how children
develop
what are the 5 foundational theories of child development?
biological perspective
psychodynamic perspective
learning perspective
cognitive-developmental perspective
contextual perspective
the biological perspective
development is deterined mainly by biological forces
heavily on the nature side
includes the maturational theory and ethological theory
maturational theory
development reflects the natural unfolding of a pre-arranged biological plan
ethological theory
many survivors are viewed as adaptive because they have survival value
Charles Darwin
believed that understanding the development of individuals within a species can help understand how a species developed
baby biographies : he studied his own children
believed that any species of animal will have more offsprings that can survive in the wild
the offsprings that were fit to survive would pass on their genes; those that were not do not survive and thus, dont pass on their genes
Stanley Hall
largely influence by Darwin
Child development was based on the premise that growing children would recapitulate evolutionary stages of development as they grew up, that it was counterproductive to push a child ahead of its development stage
belived that children must go through certain stages to develop appropriately
humans are psychologically similar to “primitive” humans and “primitive” humans are psychologically similar to our children today
Haeckel
proposed that the embryonic development of each organism follows the evolutionary history of its species
“ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”
any species can be determined by the development of the embryo???
Gesell's maturational theory
child development occurs according to a predetermined, naturally unfolding plan of growth
his most notable acheivement was his contribution to the “normative” approach to studying children
what does “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny” mean
ontogeny: child development from conception → (the child's developmental history from birth to now)
phylogeny: evoluntionary history : how through natural selection, we went from amphibians and evolved to humans
this quote was eventually debunked
what is the “normative” approach to studying children
normative: things that are the same in development that differ across children
psychologists observed children of various ages and took notes on when most children acheived various developmental milestones
Gesell was among the first to make knowledge about child development meaningful to parents by informing them of what to expect at each stage
we need to be aware of the child's development and when teaching them, tailor it to their learning stages
Lorenz
ethology
critical period hypothesis
implinting
ethology
concerned with the adaptive, or survival, value of behavior and its evolutionary history
what are the two important concepts of ethology
critical period (sensitive period)
Imprinting
critical period (sensitive period)
Time during which a child is ready and able to learn something (not too early or too late)
imprinting
forming an emotional bond between the child and the first moving object (usually the mother)
Konrad Lorenz's imprinting study
when chicks hatch the first thing they see is theur mother
imprinting is so powerful that the chicks will follow anyone
Lorenz tested this by being present when the chicks were born -- they learned to follow him
the psychodynamic perspective
development is determined by how a child resolves conflicts at different ages
what are the two major theories in the psychodynamic perspective
freud's psychosexual theory
erikson's psychosocial theory
What are freud's 3 components of personality
id
ego
superego
children experience conflict between their desires and what they “should" do
id
our primary impulses, pleasures, wants, biological needs
largest portion of the mind
ego
our conscious awareness which mediates between the id and superego
emerges in early infancy
redirects id impulses in acceptable ways
superego
the conscience
the child learns what is acceptable and that they can be punished for their actions
our sense of guilt
develops late (3-6) through interactions with caregivers
preconscious
what we are not thinking of but can easily come to mind
what are the different psychosexual stages
oral
anal
phallic
latency
genital
oral stage
birth - 1
anal
1-3
phallic
3-6
latency
6-11
genital
adolescence
phallic fixation
anything that has a sexual connotation **check pp
Erickson stages of psychosocial development
each stage involves a crisis that must be resolved
believed freud put too much emphasis on sexuality and not enough emphasis on the social environment '
was inspired by freud
what are Erickson's pschosocial stages
basic trust/ mistrust (oral)
autonomy vs shame and doubt (anal)
initiative vs guit (phallic)
industry vs inferiority (latency)
identity vs role confusion (genital)
intimacy vs isolation
generartivity vs stagnation
integrity vs despair
basic trust/ mistrust
autonomy vs shame and doubt
initiative vs guilt
industry vs inferiority
identity vs role confusion
intimacy vs isolation
generativity vs stagnation
integrity vs despair
the learning perspective - theorists and main beliefs involved
emphasis on the importance of experience in development
learning is a continuous theory
Pavlov- classical conditioning: forming associations between stimuli
B.F. Skinner- operant conditioning: reinforcement and punishment
Skinner
one of the most important people in psychology
believed the mind is unobservable
it is unecessary to dealve into someone's mind
all we need to do is observe behaviour
the enviornment is what shapes behavior
Skinner- ocasion setting
**another word for the discriminative stimulus
a place becomes associated with the behavior
ex. if you pick a spot where you only do one behavior (Study), everytime you go to that place it will make you want to study (operant)
the fact that you feel a sense of accomplishment when you go to that location is classical conditioning because the desk becomes a conditioned stimulus that now elicits a behavior
positive reinforcement
when behavior is followed by a positive consequence, it increases the idea that the behavior will occur again
adding something following the behavior
**the best way to do it according to Skinner
negative reinforcement
the removal of a negative event in the environment (ex. the child is too hot, so parent takes off blanket)
removing something bad in child's environment
positive punishment
the child does something bad, so you give them something bad
negative punishment
a behavior removes something good (ex. you misbehaved so no phone)
shaping
a rewarding chain whereby the child learns through steps and is reinforced for successive approximations
ex. child is learning to make pancakes: child successively puts flour into bowl (good job), then reinforce them as they do more things right
adults also learn like this
we learn through small steps
Pavlov
reflexes are innate behaviors
pavlov's dog experiment where he rang the bell and gave the dog food repetitvely (making dog salivate) until one day, the bells itself made the dog salivate → bell becomes the CS
shows that reflexes can be malleable and learned
Watson and Raynor - Little Albert
little albert loved the white rat at beginning of study
eventually the experimenters starting making loud noises while albert was playing with the rat and he started to cry (emotional reaction)
the white rat became an object of fear (went from NS to CS)
little albert became afraid of other things that were similar to the white rat because he generalized
the learning perspective in sum
some theorists believed in:
learning through imitation
social cognitive theory
bandura's social cognitive theory
children actively interpret events and respond based on their perceptions
children develop a sense of ‘self-efficacy' through experinence and this influences their behavior
“self-belief does not necessarily ensure success, but self-disbelief assuredly spawns failure
self-efficacy
an individual's belief in his or her capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments
reflects confidence in ability to exert control over one's own motivation, behavior and socila environment
bandura - bobo doll experiment
children observe their parent either treating a Bobo Doll nicely or beating it up— being mean
then, the experimenters observed how the kids interacted with the doll when they were alone with it
results: children imitated how their parents treated the doll
this suggests that children do learn through observation and they not only model the behavior but also model the aggression (if they saw parent being aggressive)
ex. child might use gun even though the parents didn’t
cognitive-developmental perspective
Piaget
development reflects children’s efforts to understand the world
children participate in their own cognitive development
They are viewed as “little scientists” who develop and revise theories with experience
they learn from the effects of the environment
Piaget
invented the cognitive-developmental perspective
developed a 4 stage sequence that characterizes children’s changing understanding of the world
circular reactions: child learns about the effects of the world (ex. child is conducting an experiment when they keep throwing off a spoon from the table)
Piaget’s 4 stages of cognitive development
sensorimotor
preoperational
concrete operational
formal operational
sensorimotor stage
birth to 2 years old
infant’s knowledge of the world is based on senses and motor skills
by the end of the period, infant uses mental representations
child has to see actions happen, they cannot imagine them
preoperational
2-6 years old
child learns how to use symbols such as words and numbers to represent aspects od the world but relates to the world only through their own perspective
3 mountains test: child can only see the world from their own perspective
concrete operational
7-11 years
child understands and applies logical operations to experiences, provided the experiences are focused on here and now
child cannot form hypotheses about the world
cannot think into the future
formal operational
ado and beyond
adolescent or adult thinks abstractly, speculates on hypothetical situations, and reasons deductively about what may be possible
Piaget argues that for some people, this never fully develops
some adults are not good at thinking of alternative ways to do something
sociocultural theory of development
a person’s cognitive development is largely influenced by their surrounding culture
the contextual perspective
Vygotsky
development is determined by immediate and more distant environments, which typically influence each other
people and institutions together form a culture - the knowledge, skills and attitudes of a group of people
Vygotsky
believed that adults convey to children the beliefs, customs, and skills of their culture
it is important for kids to identify what they can and cannot do by themselves
zone of proximal development
when the child realizes that they can do something w/o the help of others
what needs to be done to take the learner where he needs to be
**this continues throughout life
the contextual perspective—Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems theory
views development within the set of nested, interacting systems
microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and chronosystem
continuous and discontinuous
ecological system’s theory includes:
microsystem
mesosystem
exosystem
macrosystem
chronosystem