RPH ORAL EXAM

as a student of your program, why is it important to know more about philippine history?

as a civil engineering students, it’s important to know more about the Philippine history because it helps me understand the cultural and historical context of the infrastructure and landmarks I may work on. Many projects involve preserving and developing sites with historical significance, so understanding their background ensures that we respect heritage while building modern infrastructure.

would you support the decision of the National Historical Commission that the cry of revolution happened in Pugad Lawin?

yes, because there’s a documents from andres bonifacio’s contemporaries like the memoirs of santiago alvarez and the testimonies of katipunan members affirm that bonifacio and his men tear their cedulas in pugad lawin, signaling them their refusal to submit to spanish rule.

with the filipino version rivaling the spanish version of cavite mutiny, which do you think is much more plausible?

I think the filipino version is more plausible because it reflects the grievances of the filipino workers and soldiers against the oppressive policies of spanish colonial government. the spanish version, which portrayed the mutiny as a part of a grand conspiracy, was likely exaggerated to justify the harsher repression and control over the filipinos.

what do we mean by “one past, many histories”?

one past many histories, means that while we have a single past, there are multiple perspectives and interpretations of the historical event. different group of people may have a different experiences and views of the same event, leading to diverse historical narratives.

how did the GOMBURZA and the Cavite Mutiny contribute to the growth of filipino nationalism?

the martyrdom of the gomburza and cavite mutiny is important in igniting filipino nationalism. the execution of the gomburza for alleged involvement in mutiny, despite limited evidences, exposed the injustices of the spanish colonial rule and galvanized the filipino people to fight for reform and independence. these events inspired future leaders, including jose rizal, and fueled the nationalist movement.

what is the significance of tearing the cedulas? what did the cedulas signify?

in 1896, tearing the cedulas during the cry of pugad lawin was significant because it symbolized the filipino’s rejection of spanish colonial rule and their willingness to fight for freedom. the cedulas were a form of identification and taxation imposed by the spanish government. and tearing them was a bold act of defiance and the declaration of the start of the revolution.

what role do education and the media play in influencing how the public views historical disputes as they changed over time?

education and media shape public perceptions of history by providing narratives that influence understanding and engagement with past events. they play a crucial role in promoting critical thinking and discussions, which can either reinforce or challenged the established historical accounts over time.

how do stories about rizal’s retraction impact modern perceptions of rizal and his contirbutions to filipino identity?

stories about rizal’s retraction sparks debate about his beliefs and legacy. some may see it as a sign that he changed his stance while others believed it doesn’t affect his contributions. these discussions impact how modern filipinos view his role in shaping the national identity., with many still honoring his dedication for freedom and reform regardless of the issue.

what takeaway do you believe the cavite mutiny taught us

the mutiny taught us the importance of standing up against oppression and fight for freedom. it serves as a reminder that small act of dissent can spark significant movements for change and national identity.

what is the core filipino claim in the cavite mutiny dispute?

the core filipino claim in the cavite mutiny dispute emphasizes that the mutiny was a legitimate response to systemic injustice and discrimination by the spanish colonial government. it asserts the perspective that filipinos were fighting for their rights and freedom rather than simply rebelling.