1/11
Practice questions regarding the legal consequences of failing to follow post-amendment procedures and statutory requirements in criminal trials.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is the effect of failing to read and explain an amended charge to a defendant before their plea is taken?
It will render the trial a nullity.
Which 2011 case specifies that failure to read and explain an amended charge to a defendant renders the trial a nullity?
Iyodela versus the States (2011).
What is the potential consequence of failing to grant the defendant reasonable time and facilities, such as an adjournment, to prepare for their defense?
It may vitiate the proceedings.
According to the lecture, which section of the CFRN relates to the right of the defendant to have enough time for their defense?
Section 36 sub 6 of the CFRN.
Which 1961 case is cited regarding the failure to avail the defendant enough time for defense by way of adjournment?
Gokpa versus IGP (1961).
In general, what happens if failure to comply with post-amendment procedures results in a miscarriage of justice for the defendant?
It will vitiate the proceedings.
What is the legal status of a trial where there has been a failure to comply with statutory requirements?
The trial is null, void, and of no effect.
When a trial is rendered null and void due to statutory non-compliance, what action does the appellate court typically take?
The appellate court will set the conviction aside.
Under what circumstance may an appellate court order a retrial even if the original conviction was set aside due to statutory non-compliance?
When there is overwhelming evidence.
Which 1974 case is associated with the failure to comply with statutory requirements and the resulting nullity of the trial?
Echazo versus COP (1974).
Does the withdrawal of charges against absconded co-defendants amount to an amendment requiring post-amendment procedures?
No, withdrawal of charges against absconded co-defendants has been held not to amount to amendment.
Which two 1987 cases are cited regarding the withdrawal of charges against absconded co-defendants?
Adebayo versus the State (1987) and Oguntolu versus the State (1987).