Key Supreme Court Cases: Federalism, Civil Rights, and Liberties

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/12

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

13 Terms

1
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Can Congress create a national bank? Can states tax it? Holding: Yes to the bank; No to state taxation. Principle: Elastic Clause + Supremacy Clause. Significance: Expanded federal power over the states.

2
New cards

U.S. v. Lopez (1995)

Does Congress have the power to regulate guns near schools under the Commerce Clause? Holding: No. Principle: Limits of the Commerce Clause. Significance: Reinforced federalism by limiting congressional power.

3
New cards

Baker v. Carr (1962)

Can federal courts hear cases about legislative redistricting? Holding: Yes. Principle: Justiciability & Equal Protection Clause. Significance: Opened the door to one person, one vote cases.

4
New cards

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

Are racially gerrymandered districts constitutional? Holding: Racial gerrymandering can violate Equal Protection. Principle: 14th Amendment. Significance: Limited race-based redistricting.

5
New cards

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

Is school-sponsored prayer constitutional? Holding: No. Principle: Establishment Clause. Significance: Separation of church and state in public schools.

6
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

Can Amish parents refuse to send children to school past 8th grade? Holding: Yes. Principle: Free Exercise Clause. Significance: Religious freedom can outweigh state interests.

7
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

Do students have free speech rights at school? Holding: Yes, as long as it doesn't disrupt learning. Principle: Symbolic speech. Standard: 'Substantial disruption'. Significance: Expanded student rights.

8
New cards

Schenck v. United States (1919)

Can speech be limited during wartime? Holding: Yes. Principle: Clear and Present Danger. Significance: Limits free speech under certain conditions.

9
New cards

New York Times v. United States (1971)

Can the government stop publication of classified documents? Holding: No. Principle: Prior restraint is unconstitutional. Significance: Strengthened freedom of the press.

10
New cards

McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010)

Does the Second Amendment apply to the states? Holding: Yes. Principle: Selective incorporation via the 14th Amendment. Significance: Expanded individual gun rights nationwide.

11
New cards

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Does the right to an attorney apply to states? Holding: Yes. Principle: 6th Amendment, Selective incorporation. Significance: Guaranteed right to counsel in felony cases.

12
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Is school segregation constitutional? Holding: No. Principle: Equal Protection Clause. Significance: Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson; ended legal segregation.

13
New cards

Still learning (12)

You've started learning these terms. Keep it up!