Social Psychology ch. 2+3

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/92

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:50 PM on 9/4/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

93 Terms

1
New cards

hypothesis

A specific, testable prediction about when or why something will happen.

2
New cards

theory

An organized set of principles used to explain and predict observed phenomena.

3
New cards

Basic research

Research designed to increase our understanding of human behavior.

4
New cards

applied research

Research designed to solve real-world problems or apply psychological knowledge to practical situations.

5
New cards

conceptual variable

An abstract idea being studied, such as love, happiness, social anxiety, lonliness, etc.

6
New cards

operational definition

The specific way a researcher measures or manipulates a conceptual variable.

7
New cards

construct validity

How well the study's measurements or manipulations actually represent the conceptual variables they're supposed to represent.

8
New cards

interrater reliability

The amount of agreement between multiple observers who are judging the same behavior.

9
New cards

descriptive research

describes people's thoughts, feelings, or behaviors without trying to determine cause and effect.

10
New cards

archival research

Researchers examine existing records, such as historical documents, crime statistics, sports statistics, medical records, or social-media data.

pro: Researchers aren't influencing the behavior because they're studying records that already exist.

con: Records may be incomplete or poorly collected.

11
New cards

random sampling

everyone in the population has an equal chance of being selected. It helps make the sample representative of the larger population. Determines WHO gets into the study.

12
New cards

correlational research

examines whether two variables are related to each other. Researchers measure variables rather than manipulating them.

13
New cards

correlation coefficient

A number from −1.0 to +1.0 that tells us the strength and direction of a relationship.

14
New cards

positive correlation

Both variables move in the same direction.

15
New cards

negative correlation

Variables move in opposite directions.

16
New cards

zero correlation

There is no consistent relationship between the variables.

17
New cards

experiments

used to determine cause and effect.

18
New cards

experimenter control

Researchers control and manipulate the variables.

19
New cards

random assignment

Participants are randomly placed into different conditions. Determines WHICH CONDITION participants are placed into. Helps researchers determine cause and effect.

20
New cards

Internal validity

Can we be confident that the independent variable actually caused the result?

Experiments have stronger internal validity when researchers control other possible explanations.

21
New cards

confound

another factor that changes along with the independent variable and could explain the results.

22
New cards

control group

A group that experiences the procedures without the experimental treatment, providing a comparison or baseline.

23
New cards

Experimenter Expectancy Effects

Researchers' expectations can unintentionally influence participants or the results.

24
New cards

external validity

Can the results be generalized to other people and situations?

A study has stronger external validity if its findings apply beyond the specific participants and setting used in the study.

25
New cards

mundane realism

How much the research setting resembles real life.

26
New cards

experimental realism

How much the situation feels real and involving to the participant, even if it doesn't resemble everyday life.

27
New cards

deception

Researchers give participants false or incomplete information about the study to produce more natural behavior.

28
New cards

confederate

A person who appears to be a participant but is actually working with the researcher.

29
New cards

Statistical Significance

A statistical result suggesting that the observed finding is unlikely to have occurred simply by chance.

30
New cards

5% threshold

if chance could explain the result fewer than 5 times out of 100, the finding is considered statistically significant.

31
New cards

replication

Repeating a study to see whether similar results occur again.

32
New cards

meta-analysis

A statistical technique that combines the results of multiple studies to determine the overall strength and reliability of an effect.

33
New cards

Institutional Review Board

A group that reviews research proposals to make sure participants' rights and welfare are protected.

34
New cards

informed consent

Participants receive enough information about the study and its potential risks to make an informed decision about participating.

35
New cards

debriefing

Participants receive enough information about the study and its potential risks to make an informed decision about participating.

36
New cards

preregistration

Researchers record their predictions and analysis plans before collecting data.

37
New cards

open science

Researchers make their materials and data accessible to improve transparency.

38
New cards

cognition

how we think about ourselves

39
New cards

affect

how we feel about ourselves

40
New cards

behavior

how we regulate and present ourselves

41
New cards

self-concept

The sum total of beliefs we have about ourselves—our traits, abilities, motivations, identities, etc.

42
New cards

self-schemas

Specific beliefs about ourselves that guide how we process information about ourselves.

43
New cards

schematic

An attribute is an important part of your self-concept.

44
New cards

aschematic

An attribute isn't particularly important to how you define yourself.

45
New cards

looking-glass self

Charles Horton Cooley's idea that other people act like a mirror through which we see ourselves.

We often think: “how do other epople see me?” and incorporate those perceptions into our own self-concept.

46
New cards

relational self

Our sense of who we are is influenced by our past and current relationships with important people.

47
New cards

meta-insight

The ability to understand the difference between:

  • how we see ourselves

  • how other people see us


48
New cards

introspection

looking inward at your own thoughts, feelings, beliefs, and motivations.

49
New cards

affective forecasting

Predicting how you will feel in the future.

The textbook says we're often bad at predicting our future emotional reactions.

50
New cards

impact bias

The tendency to overestimate the intensity and duration of our future emotional reactions. when the event actually happens, we often adjust and cope better than we predicted.

51
New cards

self-perception theory

Daryl Bem's theory that when our internal feelings are unclear, we can learn about ourselves by observing our own behavior and the situation. "I watch what I do → I figure out what I must feel/believe."

52
New cards

SOKA model

explains when we know ourselves better than other people—and when other people may know us better.

53
New cards

Facial feedback hypothesis

Changes in facial expressions can influence or trigger the subjective experience of emotion. Your face can influence how you feel. EX: Research in the textbook found that smiling can make people feel somewhat happier.

54
New cards

intrinsic motivation

Doing something because you enjoy it, find it interesting, or find it challenging.

55
New cards

extrinsic motivation

Doing something because of an outside reward or consequence.

56
New cards

overjustification effect

When an expected external reward causes someone to become less intrinsically motivated to do something they originally enjoyed. EX: you love art, but when you start getting paid to do it, you see it as more of a job.

57
New cards

social comparison theory

Leon Festinger's theory that when objective information isn't available, people evaluate their abilities and opinions by comparing themselves with others.

58
New cards

upward social comparison

Comparing yourself with someone who is better/more successful in an area.

-Can inspire you, but can also make you feel inadequate.

59
New cards

downward social comparison

Comparing yourself with someone who is worse off than you.

-Can protect or increase self-esteem.

60
New cards

Two-factor theory of emotion

An emotion results from: 1. Physiological arousal + 2. Cognitive interpretation

Other people can influence how we interpret that arousal.

EX: Your heart is racing. You might interpret it as: "I'm scared." "I'm excited." "I'm nervous."

depending on the situation and cues around you.

61
New cards

Social psychology

how people think about, influence, and relate to one another

62
New cards

dispositional factors

internal, personal characteristics. EX: personality traits, genetics, and temperament

63
New cards

situational factors

External conditions, events, or social surroundings from the environment that shape a person’s behavior, thoughts, and feelings in a specific moment

64
New cards

autobiographical memory

Memories of events and experiences from your own life. They help create a sense of:

Continuity, Identity, and Personal history

65
New cards

Reminiscence bump

Older adults tend to remember a disproportionately large number of events from adolescence and early adulthood.

66
New cards

flashbulb memories

Very vivid and detailed memories of emotionally significant events. Some memories feel extremely accurate but aren't necessarily accurate.

67
New cards

Individualism

Emphasizes independence, autonomy, self-reliance, personal achievement, and individual goals.

68
New cards

collectivism

Emphasizes interdependence, cooperation, social harmony, group relationships, and group goals.

69
New cards

independent self

The self is viewed as separate, autonomous, unique

70
New cards

interdependent self

The self is viewed as connected to and defined partly by relationships.

71
New cards

dialecticism

A style of thinking that accepts that contradictory characteristics can coexist. Instead of: "Someone is either X OR Y." This thinking allows: "Someone can be X AND Y depending on the situation."

72
New cards

self-esteem

Our positive and negative evaluations of ourselves. It's not completely fixed. It can change in response to life experiences. EX: Academic ability, physical appearance, athletic ability, morality, social acceptance, relationships, etc.

73
New cards

Sociometer theory

Self-esteem functions as a gauge of how accepted or rejected a person feels by others. Rejection → lower self-esteem → motivation to regain acceptance

74
New cards

Hierometer theory

Self-esteem functions as a gauge of a person’s perceived social status or rank.

75
New cards

terror management theory

Self-esteem helps protect people from anxiety associated with awareness of mortality by providing meaning, identity, and connection to cultural worldviews.

76
New cards

self-discrepency theory

Our self-esteem is influenced by the gap between actual self, ideal self, and ought self.

77
New cards

actual self

Who you believe you currently are.

78
New cards

ideal self

Who you would like to be.

79
New cards

ought self

Who you believe you should be.

80
New cards

self awareness

When something causes us to focus attention on ourselves, we compare our behavior to our standards. Things that can increase self-awareness: mirrors, cameras, being on stage, talking about yourself, watching yourself on video, being the center of attention

81
New cards

Private self-consciousness

Focus on your inner thoughts and feelings.

82
New cards

Public self-consciousness

Focus on how other people see you.

83
New cards

self- regulation

The process of controlling your thoughts, feelings, urges, and behaviors in order to achieve goals or meet standards. can be mentally and physically demanding and damaging.

84
New cards

ironic processes

Sometimes the harder you try not to think about or do something, the more likely it becomes.

85
New cards

self-enhancement

The tendency to maintain or increase a positive view of ourselves.

86
New cards

better than average effect

People tend to believe they are better than average on positive characteristics.

87
New cards

self-handicapping

Creating obstacles or excuses that can protect your self-esteem from failure. EX: "I didn't study because I was too busy." If you fail, you have an excuse.

88
New cards

Sandbagging

Purposely lowering expectations or publicly predicting failure so that failure won't hurt as much—or success will look more impressive.

89
New cards

basking in reflected glory

increasing your self-esteem by associating yourself with successful people or groups.

EX: Your favorite team wins → suddenly you're wearing their sweatshirt and saying: “we won” even though you werent even actually playing

90
New cards

self-verification

The desire for other people to see us the way we see ourselves. Interestingly, people don't always want purely positive feedback. If someone has a negative self-concept, they may sometimes prefer feedback that confirms their existing self-view rather than positive feedback that contradicts it.

91
New cards

self-presentation

The process of trying to shape what other people think of us—and sometimes what we think of ourselves. We manage our public image through clothing, behavior, social media, speech, roles, and appearance.

92
New cards

spotlight effect

The tendency to overestimate how much other people notice us.

93
New cards

self-monitoring

The tendency to regulate your behavior based on the demands of a social situation. high= you adjust your behavior more