1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
POLITICAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS
(Explain all of the components of the political system analysis model and use climate change policy to illustrate how each of the components interact.
Who created the model of the political system?
David Easton
Components of Easton’s model of the political system
politics is a system of inter-related parts with
Inputs
Outputs
An inside system
An environment
Inputs
Supports and demands go into the inside system
When people don't get what they demanded, they continue to give feedback that goes through the system again and gets reprocessed
Demands - policies or laws that the public wants (could be at the micro level where citizens as individuals make demands or middle range level where interest groups and political parties make demands
Supports- any form of political participation, i.e., voting, joining interest group or political party, being involved in a campaign, writing a letter to a legislator, protesting, demonstrating, engaging in political art like signs and graffiti
Outputs
policy types
Extractive - taxes
Distributive - Giving out public resources
Regulatory- regulations of areas like government, business, banks, food and drugs, nuclear power, environmental
Evaluative - Announcing a commitment of a Nation-state to a goal or value such (e.g. Human Rights as President Jimmy Carter did).
Environment of the political system
The needs and behaviors of citizens
.
The international system
•What happens in one political system affects what happens in the other political system
Policies about trade like sanctions and tarrifs efffect other countries' economies
All countries are meant to follow international laws about human rights or they will be condemned by the international court of justice and face consequences like sanctions
The NATO alliance ensures that if one country within it is attacked, all other countries in the alliance will use their military to defend it
.
Planetary environment
Climate change on Earth leading to things like extreme weather or air toxicity
system stress
disturbances from the environment that threaten to cause a political system to collapse such as:
War
Pandemics
Economic downturns
Strikes/protests
Government shutdown
What happens if system stress is not addressed properly?
system breakdown (as the world witnessed with the collapse of the Soviet Union)
How does climate change policy illustrate how each of the components interact?
climate change - enivonment
The physical and social environment brings people's attention to climate change.
Physical triggers include
rising sea levels causing flooding
extreme weather like
heatwaves causing health risks
droughts impacting agriculture
heavy rainfall causing flooding
wildfires causing air pollution
hurricanes due to warmer oceans waters causing homes to be destroyed
Social triggers include
global scientific consensus that if global warming continues, there will be more extreme weather and sea level rising leading to human health risks, lack of water, food insecurity, and loss of biodiversity due to species losing their habitats
which has been acknowledged by many world leaders, especially during United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change conferences called Conference of the Parties, and thus is acknowledged by many citizens
climate change - inputs
Climate change activist interests groups like the Sierra Club organize protests or meet with members of Congress to present legislative proposals
They advocate for the government to
stop funding coal and gas plants and transition to clean energy
Block the building of new oil and gas pipelines
fund public transportation
increase regulation on air and water pollution
climate change - outputs
The government branches and the rest of the bureaucracy process these demands through debate and negotiation that weigh the competing interests of manufacturers and fossil fuel companies vs. environmental activists
President Obama used his executive power to have the U.S. join a major international treaty called the Paris Agreement, which set the critical target of capping the long-term global average temperature rise at no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels
The legislative branch wrote and passed the law called the Inflation Reduction Act, which offers tax credits to businesses and individuals adopting clean air technologies like solar, wind, and electric vehicles.
climate change - feedback loop
Many of the demands by interest groups and protests groups still have not been fulfilled, so they continue advocating and the feedback continues to cycle through the system
PLURALISM VS. ELITE ANALYSIS
Discuss both theoretical models of pluralism and elite analysis using the scholars whose work created these models and then analyze which model is more explanatory giving ample evidence of why using military industrial complex
Elite analysis scholars
Niccolo Machiavelli
Wilfredo Pareto
Gaetano Mosca
Charles Wright Mills
Niccolo Machiavelli
is the first modern theorist of elite analysis
views power as resting in the hands of a small group (an elite) who may provide the façade of input from influencers but ultimately wields the power
they use this power to influence political outcomes according to their interests which differ from those of the general population
institutions are built and maintained by those already in power, not by interest groups who compete and share power
this includes institutions like government agencies, universities, think tanks, and media outlets
Wilfredo Pareto
2 TYPES OF ELITE
argued there is always an ELITE and that elite it is divided into
GOVERNING ELITE (those in the formal governmental positions of authority)
NON-GOVERNING ELITE (Those in business, military, other wealthy people)
.
CIRCULATION OF ELITE
History is not stagnant, two are two types of Elite circulation-
piecemeal (incremental change of a few)
Wholesale (complete change---Revolution) however, even after that there is always a new Elite
Gaetano Mosca
4 avenues to becoming part of the elite
Birth
Wealth
Military Prowess
Having knowledge
there are 2 FORMULAS elite use to justify their rule
Religious Formula = divine right of Kings
Rational Formula = using an ideology
Charles Wright Mills
Three Groups in the United States that make up the elite
Corporate rich
Government officials
Top military leaders
.
The elite share 3 things in common
CONSCIOUSNESS- of themselves as an elite
COHERENCE- they stay together by going to the same schools and clubs
CONSPIRE- they conspire behind the scenes with one another to maintain power and exclude everyone else
Pluralism scholars
Robert Dahl
David Truman
Robert Dahl’s definition of pluralism
Power stems from resources like wealth, status, access to information, and access to decision makers
Power from said resources is not held by a single "power elite" but is dispersed among many interest groups competing to influence public policy and that have influence over different areas of public policy
Robert Dahl’s levels of analysis
3 levels of analysis
Micro level: individuals (like any voter)
Middle range level: groups of individuals
Marco level: Nation states or groups of nation states
Robert Dhal’s explination for how people share power
People share power because
On a micro level
everyone can vote to elect officials that represent their beliefs and advocate for their desires
Each person's vote carries equal weight
Voting serves as a system to check government officials who aren't serving the people
.
On a macro level
everyone can formulate preferences and signify them to the government by participating in interest groups
interest groups are always competing, ensuring that various parts of society have their interests weighed equally in decision-making
David Truman
Politics is a competitive arena where multiple groups ensure different viewpoints are considered in policy-making, thus supporting a healthy democracy
Interest groups matter because an individual can freely create & join them to effect change and there are hundreds of them
Why is elite analysis more accurate? Use the industrial complex to support your answer. (list the main points)
5 points:
Power concentrates among a small elite
Elite coordinate to maintain power
Institutional capture
Difference of interests
How the elite benefit
Power concentrates among a small elite
A handful of defense contractors receive the majority of federal contracts.
Their executives rotate into Pentagon leadership roles and congressional advisory positions.
Elite coordinate to maintain power
Defense contractors, which are private companies that design and build weapons, lobby Congress to increase military spending
Congress approves budgets that benefit contractors in their districts.
The Pentagon requests systems produced by those same contractors.
Think tanks funded by contractors publish reports justifying these expenses
Institutional capture
Rather than interest groups shaping institutions, elites shape institutions to serve their interests
Defense contractors fund:
congressional campaigns
think tanks
university research
veterans’ organizations
media advertising
Difference of interests
The public generally prefers reduced military spending and fewer foreign interventions.
However, the U.S. government continues to invest in military and has the highest military budget out of any country in the world and is the largest arms exporter
This is can only be explained by elite analysis - the government does this because the MIC benefits from:
perpetual conflict
expanding budgets
technological arms races
foreign arms sales
How the elite benefit
Defense contractors gain profit from selling arms to the government
Members of the Department of Defense & the Pentagon Bureaucracy decide what weapons to buy, what threats to prioritize, and how budgets are allocated. They receive money from defense contractors for making decisions that increase their arms sales.
Members of Congress approve budgets and authorize military programs. They also receive money from defense contractors for making decisions that increase their arms sales.
Media outlets and think tanks receive money from defense contractors to produce reports that increase the perception of threats and justify wars which both justify government military spending.
Universities have contracts with private defense contractors and government agencies to do weapons research