1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
P1 - Rights in marriage —> Significantly improved
The Married Women’s Property Act (1882) allowed married women to own and inherit property.
This gave some women, particularly the wealthier, a degree of financial independence within marriage.
The age of consent was raised to 16 in 1886, protecting young girls from early marriage and sexual exploitation.
The 1857 Divorce Act allowed women to apply for divorce on grounds such as cruelty, bigamy or incest.
HOWEVER
Most WC women didn’t benefit from property rights as they owned little or nothing.
Divorce laws remained unequal, as men could divorce on the basis of adultery alone.
Divorce still cost around £100, making it inaccessible for most women.
Women remained legally subordinate to their husbands within marriage.
Marital rape was not a crime by 1918, showing continued male dominance.
Improvements were limited, minor, and applied only to some women, meaning overall status in marriage remained low.
P2 - Voting and Legal rights → Not significantly improved
In 1850, women could not vote in any elections; by 1918 this had clearly changed.
The Municipal Franchise Act (1870) allowed married, rate-paying women to vote in local elections.
This was extended to unmarried women in 1888, further widening female participation.
By 1900, around 1 million women could vote in local elections.
The growth of suffrage organisations such as the NUWSS and WSPU, with 55,000 members by 1914, shows increasing political influence.
The Representation of the People Act (1918) allowed women over 30 to vote for the first time in national elections.
Around two-thirds of women were enfranchised by 1918, marking a clear improvement compared to the mid-19th century.
HOWEVER
Early voting rights only applied to wealthier, rate-paying women, excluding most of the working class.
The 1918 Act imposed age and property qualifications, excluding many women who had campaigned for suffrage.
Even many middle-class women could not meet the property requirements.
Women who worked during the war often lost their jobs afterwards, making it harder to qualify to vote.
Suffrage was unequal, as all men over 21 could vote while women faced restrictions.
Most working-class women remained disenfranchised, limiting the overall significance of reform.
P3 - Work & education opportunities
The growth of women’s rights ideas, such as Mill’s Subjection of Women, challenged the ‘separate spheres’ ideology.
Private girls’ schools with modern curricula improved education and prospects for wealthier women.
London University allowed women to gain degrees from 1868, increasing educational status.
During WWI, 5.7 million women entered skilled industrial work, including metals and chemicals.
Women broke into professions previously closed to them, such as medicine, with the first female doctor in 1859.
After 1918, women were allowed to stand for Parliament, indicating increased legal and social recognition.
HOWEVER
The ideology of separate spheres remained dominant, reinforced by figures such as Queen Victoria.
Most educational improvements benefited middle- and upper-class women, excluding the working class.
Top universities continued to exclude women, limiting their academic and professional progress.
Many wartime employment gains were temporary and reversed after 1918.
Women were pushed back into low-paid domestic service and paid less than men.
Most working-class women had limited opportunities due to lack of education and attitudes about ‘men’s work’
Conclusion
Improvements in women’s status by 1918 were limited and uneven, as marriage laws, education and employment opportunities mainly benefited wealthier women, while working-class women saw little lasting change.
Political rights expanded, but female suffrage remained restricted to older, property-owning women, meaning many were still disadvantaged compared to men, for whom voting was a right rather than a privilege.
Overall, although there was some progress, continued male dominance, persistent social attitudes and unequal access to reforms mean women’s status had not significantly improved by 1918.