Biology Labs 1-3

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/57

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:43 PM on 9/2/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

58 Terms

1
New cards

California gall wasp

Andricus quercuscalifornicus; insect that induces oak apple gall formation on valley oak trees.

2
New cards

Valley oak

Quercus lobata; host tree species where oak apple galls develop.

3
New cards

Inquiline

An organism that uses the gall for shelter or food without directly killing the gall wasp larva.

4
New cards

Parasitoid

An organism (e.g., Torymus californicus) that lays eggs inside the gall chamber, parasitizing and killing the gall wasp larva.

5
New cards

Large, irregular hole in gall

Indicates predation by a larger animal (e.g., bird or small mammal).

6
New cards

Small, circular hole in gall

Indicates exit of an adult wasp or unknown insect that successfully emerged.

7
New cards

Remains of two individuals in larval chamber

Indicates parasitism by a parasitoid wasp.

8
New cards

Observation vs. Inference

An observation is direct measurement or recording of data; an inference is a logical explanation or interpretation of that observation.

9
New cards

Hypothesis

A tentative, testable, and falsifiable explanation for an observed phenomenon.

10
New cards

Null Hypothesis (H0)

A statistical hypothesis asserting that there is no significant difference, effect, or relationship between observed data and expected theoretical ratios.

11
New cards

Alternative Hypothesis (HA)

A statistical hypothesis asserting that an experimental treatment or variable produces a real, significant effect.

12
New cards

Purpose of a two-tailed t-test

To compare the means of two distinct groups and determine if differences are statistically significant.

13
New cards

Two-Tailed T-Test vs. Chi-Square Test

A t-test compares continuous numeric means between two groups, whereas a Chi-Square test compares categorical observed counts to expected counts.

14
New cards

Five processes of microevolution

Natural selection, mutation, genetic drift, gene flow (migration), and non-random mating.

15
New cards

Genetic drift

Random changes in allele frequencies over generations due to chance events.

16
New cards

Impact of small population size on genetic drift

Small populations experience stronger genetic drift, leading to faster allele fixation (p=1) or loss (p=0).

17
New cards

Bottleneck Effect

A type of genetic drift resulting from a sudden, severe reduction in population size due to an environmental event or disaster.

18
New cards

Founder Effect

A type of genetic drift occurring when a small subset of individuals colonizes a new area, establishing a population with reduced genetic variation.

19
New cards

Allele Fixation

The state when an allele reaches a frequency of 1.0 (100%) in a population, resulting in the total loss of alternative alleles.

20
New cards

Allele Loss

The total elimination of an allele from a population's gene pool, leaving its frequency at 0.0.

21
New cards

Gene flow

The transfer of alleles into or out of a population due to movement of fertile individuals or gametes.

22
New cards

Conditions for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

No mutations, random mating, no natural selection, extremely large population size, and no gene flow (migration).

23
New cards

Hardy-Weinberg Assumption: Infinite Population Size

Eliminates random sampling errors and prevents genetic drift from altering allele frequencies over generations.

24
New cards

Hardy-Weinberg Assumption: Random Mating

Ensures every individual has an equal chance of mating with any other individual, preventing mate choice from altering genotype frequencies.

25
New cards

Hardy-Weinberg allele frequency formula

p + q = 1, where p is the frequency of the dominant allele and q is the frequency of the recessive allele.

26
New cards

Hardy-Weinberg genotype frequency formula

p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1, where p^2 is homozygous dominant, 2pq is heterozygous, and q^2 is homozygous recessive.

27
New cards

Three conditions necessary for natural selection

Phenotypic variation in a trait, heritability of the trait, and differential fitness/survival based on the trait.

28
New cards

Directional Selection

A mode of natural selection that favors individuals at one phenotypic extreme, shifting the population's trait distribution in that direction.

29
New cards

Stabilizing Selection

A mode of natural selection that favors intermediate phenotypes while selecting against extreme phenotypes, reducing trait variation.

30
New cards

Disruptive Selection

A mode of natural selection that favors individuals at both phenotypic extremes over individuals with intermediate traits.

31
New cards

Adaptation vs. Acclimation

Adaptation is an evolutionary, inherited trait across generations; acclimation is a short-term, temporary physiological change in a single individual.

32
New cards

Biological level at which evolution occurs

Populations evolve over generations; individual organisms do not evolve in their lifetime.

33
New cards

Non-random nature of natural selection

Survival and reproduction depend non-randomly on inherited traits matching environmental demands.

34
New cards

Primary source of new genetic variation

Mutations, which introduce novel alleles into a population.

35
New cards

Purpose of a Chi-Square goodness-of-fit test

To determine whether observed experimental outcomes differ significantly from expected theoretical frequencies.

36
New cards

Chi-Square Formula

where O is the observed count and E is the expected count for each category.

<p>where O is the observed count and E is the expected count for each category.</p>
37
New cards

Formula for degrees of freedom in Chi-Square test

df = c - 1, where c is the number of categories.

38
New cards

Standard Alpha Level (\alpha)

The significance threshold (typically \alpha = 0.05) used to determine whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis.

39
New cards

Interpretation when calculated Chi-Square > Critical Value

Reject the null hypothesis (H0); differences between observed and expected results are statistically significant.

40
New cards

Interpretation when calculated Chi-Square < Critical Value

Accept the null hypothesis (H0); differences between observed and expected results are due to chance alone.

41
New cards

Oak Gall Hypertrophy

Abnormal, rapid enlargement of plant tissue induced by insect larvae to form protective gall walls.

42
New cards

Mendelian 3:1 Phenotypic Expectation in Chi-Square

In a monohybrid cross (Aa x Aa), expected counts are 75% dominant phenotype and 25% recessive phenotype.

43
New cards

Oak Apple Gall Community Species

1. Valley Oak (host tree)

2. California Gall Wasp (gall maker/herbivore)

3. Parasitoid Wasp (e.g., Torymus californicus, kills wasp larva)

4. Inquiline Wasp/Beetle (uses gall for shelter/food) 5. Bird/Rodent (predator that tears gall open).

44
New cards

Observation vs. Inference

An observation is direct information gathered using the senses or tools (e.g., "The gall has a 2mm circular hole").

An inference is a logical interpretation or conclusion based on observations and prior knowledge (e.g., "An adult wasp emerged from this gall").

45
New cards

What Makes a Hypothesis Scientific?

A scientific hypothesis must be both testable (able to be evaluated through experiments or observations) and falsifiable (able to be proven wrong by evidence).

46
New cards

Hypothesis vs. Prediction

A hypothesis is a proposed, testable explanation for a biological phenomenon ("Parasitoid wasps target smaller galls because they are easier to penetrate").

A prediction is a specific, measurable outcome expected if the hypothesis is true ("If gall size decreases, the rate of parasitoid emergence will increase").

47
New cards

5 Processes of Microevolution

1. Natural Selection (differential survival/reproduction)

2. Genetic Drift (random chance events in allele frequencies)

3. Gene Flow (migration of individuals/alleles between populations)

4. Mutation (creation of new alleles)

5. Non-Random Mating (sexual selection or inbreeding).

48
New cards

Importance of Mutation in Evolution

Mutation is the ultimate source of all novel genetic variation. Even though single mutation rates are low, without mutation there would be no new alleles for natural selection, genetic drift, or gene flow to act upon.

49
New cards

Population Size vs. Fixation/Loss Time

Smaller populations (N) experience stronger genetic drift, causing alleles to reach fixation (p=1.0) or loss (p=0.0) much faster. Larger populations resist drift, taking many more generations for alleles to fix or be lost.

50
New cards

Initial Allele Frequency vs. Fixation/Loss Time

Higher initial frequencies (p) make an allele far more likely and faster to reach fixation (p=1.0), while lower initial frequencies make an allele more likely to be lost (p=0.0) early on by chance.

51
New cards

Low (0.2) vs. Normal (0.7) Migration Rates

Both rates cause allele/genotype frequencies between populations to homogenize (become similar) over time. However, the higher rate (0.7) achieves equilibrium and genetic uniformity much faster than the lower rate (0.2).

52
New cards

Why Real Populations Rarely Meet HWE

HWE requires 5 strict conditions (no drift/infinite size, no gene flow, no mutation, random mating, no selection). Real environments constantly experience finite population sizes, migration, mutations, mate choice, and selective pressures.

53
New cards

Conditions of Natural Selection Met in Lab

1. Variation: Multiple prey colors (paper dots) and predator beak types existed. 

2. Heritability: Surviving prey colors reproduced based on survival proportions.

3. Differential Fitness: Camouflaged prey survived predator attacks better than non-camouflaged prey.

54
New cards

Random vs. Non-Random Results

Results were non-random. Predators actively selected easier-to-see prey colors first, leading to directional changes in prey color frequencies based on camouflage effectiveness rather than pure chance.

55
New cards

Biological Level of Evolution

The population level changed over time. Individual prey items (paper dots) never changed color; rather, the overall color frequencies of the prey population shifted across generations.

56
New cards

Simulating Mutation in Lab Setup

Introduce a brand new paper dot color (e.g., neon yellow) in generation 2 or 3 that was not present in the original starting population to represent a novel genetic allele.

57
New cards

Simulating Genetic Drift in Lab Setup

Remove a large batch of prey paper dots at random without looking (a natural disaster bottleneck) or transfer a small random sample of dots to a new habitat board (a founder effect).

58
New cards

Simulating Gene Flow in Lab Setup

Move a fixed number of paper dots between two different habitat boards (representing migration between two distinct prey populations) during the reproduction phase.