Invitational rhetoric, culture, and modern persuasion concepts (Video notes)

A set of practice flashcards covering invitational rhetoric, cultural context in persuasion, biases, online behavior, and the ethics of benevolent outreach based on the video notes.

What term describes a rhetoric that welcomes difference and aims to understand others rather than persuade them?

Invitational rhetoric.

What are the three Aristotelian modes of persuasion that underpin classical rhetoric?

Ethos, Logos, and Pathos.

Why does persuasion work differently across cultures according to the notes?

Because different cultural foundations and rules influence communication and what is considered respectful or persuasive.

What online phenomenon describes being exposed mostly to like-minded views, reinforcing beliefs?

Echo chambers.

What bias explains our tendency to seek affirmation from others who share our beliefs?

Affirmation bias (a form of confirmation/affinity bias).

What term describes rhetoric that claims to help others by bringing them into your worldview, and may be benevolent yet flawed?

Benevolent rhetoric.

What is the difference between tolerance and appreciation in invitational rhetoric?

Tolerance is minimal acceptance; appreciation means valuing, understanding, and accommodating differences.

What word means not only accepting but actively accommodating others so they can be themselves?

Accommodate.

How should one approach persuasion when the other person holds different perspectives, according to the notes?

Use different rhetorics, start from their perspective, and avoid pushing too hard; aim to understand first.

What does the phrase 'Greeks talking to Greeks, convincing Greeks about Greek laws' illustrate?

The origins of rhetoric within a culturally shared context (ethos, logos, pathos).

What role does modern technology play in shaping how we communicate according to the notes?

Smartphones and digital communication create new ways of staying in touch and change the dynamics of persuasion and connection.

What is invitational rhetoric's ultimate goal regarding difference and understanding?

To welcome difference, seek understanding, and value other perspectives.

What is the main caution about benevolent rhetoric as described in the notes?

Even with good intentions, it may be unwanted or misguided if it ignores the audience's consent or needs.