Intro to Assessment & Evaluation

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/69

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:39 PM on 7/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

70 Terms

1
New cards

Two parts of an eval

Occupational profile & analysis of occupational performance

2
New cards

Screening

Quick review of clients situation to determine if OT treatment is warrented

3
New cards

Evaluation

Obtaining and interpreting information for intervention planning

4
New cards

Assessment

A specific tool, instrument, or systematic interaction used to collect profile and performance data

5
New cards

Descriptive assessments

Used to describe individuals

6
New cards

Evaluative assessments

Uses criteria to measure indiviuals’s traits over time

7
New cards

Predictive assessments

Uses criteria to predict traits or skills

8
New cards

Criterion referenced assessments

Focuses on mastery of a skill without comparison to the “norm” or others

9
New cards

Normative assessments

Compares scores to “norm” in clients population

10
New cards

Sensitivity

A test's ability to correctly identify those with the condition

SnNOut

  • if high sensitivity, negative results rules out condition

11
New cards

Specificity

A test's ability to correctly identify those without the condition

SpPIn

  • if high specificity, positive rules in

12
New cards

Reliability

The consistency of results

13
New cards

Validity

The ability of a test to measure what it’s intended to

14
New cards

Standard error of measurement

Considers sources of error and gives a range of where the possible “true” score may lie

15
New cards

Face validity

Cannot be tested, agreed upon with peer review that assessment is testing what they want it to

16
New cards

Content validity

The extent the assessment covers or reflects the phenomenon being assessed

17
New cards

Construct validity

Degree to which the test measures the concept and how accurate it is at describing the complete phenomenon

18
New cards

Top-down approach

Starts by gathering info to get to root of problem

19
New cards

Bottom-up approach

Starts at the specific issue and works up to examine other related aspects

20
New cards

What is the purpose of the OT evaluation process?

To gather information about occupational performance, identify strengths and barriers, and develop a client-centered intervention plan.

21
New cards

What is an occupational profile?

A summary of the client's history, interests, goals, routines, values, and priorities.

22
New cards

What are characteristics of effective client interviews?

Open-ended questions, active listening, empathy, respect, and collaboration.

23
New cards

What is occupational analysis?

Breaking down an occupation into its individual demands and components.

24
New cards

What are client factors?

Values, beliefs, spirituality, body functions, and body structures that influence occupational performance.

25
New cards

What are performance patterns?

Habits, routines, roles, and rituals.

26
New cards

What are contexts?

Personal and environmental circumstances that influence occupational performance.

27
New cards

What should OTs observe during occupational performance?

Safety, independence, efficiency, effort, quality, performance skills, and client factors.

28
New cards

What are standardized assessments?

Formal assessments administered and scored using consistent procedures.

29
New cards

What are non-standardized assessments?

Flexible evaluation methods without standardized administration or scoring.

30
New cards

Examples of non-standardized assessments include?

Clinical observations, interviews, checklists, questionnaires, activity analyses, and informal assessments.

31
New cards

Can an assessment be reliable but not valid?

Yes. It can consistently measure the wrong thing.

32
New cards

What should be considered when selecting an assessment?

Client goals, diagnosis, age, setting, psychometric properties, time, cost, and purpose.

33
New cards

What are norm-referenced assessments?

Assessments comparing a client's performance to a normative sample.

34
New cards

What are criterion-referenced assessments?

Assessments measuring whether a client meets a specific standard or skill level.

35
New cards

What is a performance-based assessment?

An assessment requiring the client to perform actual tasks.

36
New cards

What is clinical reasoning?

The process of making informed decisions using evidence, client information, and professional judgment.

37
New cards

Why is documentation important in OT?

It communicates findings, supports clinical reasoning, demonstrates medical necessity, and ensures continuity of care.

38
New cards

What should be included in an OT evaluation report?

Occupational profile, assessments used, observations, clinical interpretation, occupational performance problems, goals, and recommendations.

39
New cards

How do standardized and non-standardized assessments complement each other?

Standardized assessments provide objective data, while non-standardized assessments provide individualized, contextual information.

40
New cards

Psychometrics

The science of measuring human abilities, behaviors, or characteristics. It determines whether an assessment can be trusted.

41
New cards

Clinical Utility

How useful and practical an assessment is for a specific client and setting.

42
New cards

Inter-Rater Reliability

Consistency between different examiners scoring the same assessment.

43
New cards

Internal Consistency

Determines whether items on a test measure the same concept.

44
New cards

Cronbach Alpha

A statistical measure used to determine internal consistency.

45
New cards

Split-Half Reliability

Reliability method where a test is divided into two halves to see if both parts produce similar results.

46
New cards

Alternate Forms Reliability

Consistency between two different versions of the same test.

47
New cards

Criterion Validity

Whether an assessment agrees with a gold standard or established measure.

48
New cards

Observed Score Formula

Observed Score = True Score + Error.

49
New cards

BOT-3

Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Third Edition. A standardized assessment measuring fine and gross motor proficiency.

50
New cards

BOT-3 Purpose

To identify strengths and motor deficits and assist with intervention planning by measuring motor proficiency.

51
New cards

BOT-3 Population

Children and young adults ages 4 years 0 months-25 years 11 months.

52
New cards

BOT-3 Format

Standardized and norm-referenced assessment.

53
New cards

BOT-3 OTPF Domains

Client factors (neuromusculoskeletal and movement functions) and performance skills (motor skills).

54
New cards

Scaled Score

A score that compares subtest performance to same-age peers.

55
New cards

Standard Score

A composite score that combines multiple subtest scores.

56
New cards

Percentile Rank

The percentage of peers that a client scored better than.

57
New cards

Basal Level

The lowest level where a client consistently passes items.

58
New cards

Ceiling Level

The point where a client consistently fails items and testing stops.

59
New cards

COPM Purpose

To identify occupational problems and measure changes in occupational performance from the client's perspective.

60
New cards

COPM Format

Semi-structured interview and client-reported outcome measure. (non-standardized)

61
New cards

COPM Population

Individuals ages 6 years and older.

62
New cards

COPM Occupational Areas Measured

Occupational performance and satisfaction in self-care, productivity, and leisure.

63
New cards

COPM OTPF Domains

Occupations, performance patterns, client factors, and body functions.

64
New cards

COPM Process

Identify occupational problems → rate importance → choose top 5 priorities → rate performance → rate satisfaction → calculate averages → re-evaluate.

65
New cards

COPM Clinically Meaningful Change

A change of 2 or more points indicates meaningful improvement.

66
New cards

Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)

A standardized assessment used to measure sensorimotor recovery after stroke.

67
New cards

FMA Measures

Motor function, sensation, range of motion, balance, and joint pain.

68
New cards

FMA Format

Standardized and performance-based.

69
New cards

FMA Reference Type

Criterion-referenced.

70
New cards

Re-evaluation Purpose

Determine whether goals were achieved and whether the intervention plan should change.