1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Scare tactics (emotional)
Politicians, advertisers, and public figures use this
It’s easier to imagine something terrible happening than to appreciate its rarity
Can be used to turn legitimate fears into panic or prejudice
The tactics causing thnking that those who are scared will a
Either/Or choices (emotional)
Labeled false dilemmas
Become fallacious arguments when:
Reduce a complicated issue to simplistic terms
Designed to obscure legitimate alternatives
Tend to make it hard to make reasonable compromises
Slippery Slope (emotional)
A misstep today can lead to a disaster
When a write exaggerates the likely consequences of an action, usually to scare readers
Overly Sentimental Appeals (emotional)
Using tender emotions to distract readers from facts
Bandwagon Appeals (emotional)
pushes people to take an easier path rather than thinking independently about what choices to make
Advertising claims for products preffered by more people than any other use this more than other brands
Appeals to False Authority (ethical)
When writers offer themselves or other authorities as sufficient warrant for believing a claim
Dogmatism (ethical)
A particular position is the only “right” one
Undermines the trust between those who make and listen to the arguements
When writing in this way people imply: no arguments are needed the truth is self-evident therefore not needing support
Ad Hominem Arguments (ethical)
attack the character of a person rather than the claims they make
can distract from successful arguments they may be offering
Stacking the Deck (ethical)
Presenting only one side of a story — the one in their favor
Can cause people to raise questions about your motives
Hasty Generalization (logical)
inference drawn from insufficient evidence
In order to draw valid inferences, you must always have ample evidence and qualify your claims appropriately
Faulty Causality (logical)
“After this, therefore because of this”
Assuming because one event or action follows another, the first causes the second
Begging the Question (logical)
An argument that begins with the argument that it is trying to prove
Is a circular argument that goes nowhere
Equivocation (logical)
Half truths or arguments that give lies an honest appearance
Based on tricks of language
Sometime use contradictory qualifiers
tends to be in political aspects
Non Sequitur (logical)
an argument whose claims, reasons, or warrents don’t connect logically
Often occur when writers omit steps in an otherwise logical chain of reasoning
Straw Man (logical)
An argument that is easy to knock down, yet the writer/speaker still claims victory over an opponent (that may not even exist)
Politicians tend use this because they want to characterize the positions of their opponents as more extreme than they are
Red Herring (logical)
Changes the subject abruptly or introduces an irrelevant claim or fact to throw the readers/listeners off the trail
Used to undermine other peoples arguments
Has become a way of saying:
“I disagree with your argument”
“Your point is irrelevant”
Faulty Analogy (logical)
Inaccurate or inconsequential comparisons betwen objects or concepts
Paralipsis (logical)
occurs when speakers or writers say they will not talk about something, therefore doing what they said they weren’t going to
It’s a way of getting a point to an argument, through sneaking it in