Fallacies of Argument- Everything's an Argument

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/17

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

18 Terms

1
New cards

Scare tactics (emotional)

  • Politicians, advertisers, and public figures use this

  • It’s easier to imagine something terrible happening than to appreciate its rarity

  • Can be used to turn legitimate fears into panic or prejudice

  • The tactics causing thnking that those who are scared will a

2
New cards

Either/Or choices (emotional)

  • Labeled false dilemmas

  • Become fallacious arguments when:

    • Reduce a complicated issue to simplistic terms

    • Designed to obscure legitimate alternatives

  • Tend to make it hard to make reasonable compromises

3
New cards

Slippery Slope (emotional)

  • A misstep today can lead to a disaster

  • When a write exaggerates the likely consequences of an action, usually to scare readers

4
New cards

Overly Sentimental Appeals (emotional)

  • Using tender emotions to distract readers from facts 

5
New cards

Bandwagon Appeals (emotional)

  • pushes people to take an easier path rather than thinking independently about what choices to make

  • Advertising claims for products preffered by more people than any other use this more than other brands

6
New cards

Appeals to False Authority (ethical)

  • When writers offer themselves or other authorities as sufficient warrant for believing a claim

7
New cards

Dogmatism (ethical)

  • A particular position is the only “right” one

  • Undermines the trust between those who make and listen to the arguements

  • When writing in this way people imply: no arguments are needed the truth is self-evident therefore not needing support

8
New cards

Ad Hominem Arguments (ethical)

  • attack the character of a person rather than the claims they make

    • can distract from successful arguments they may be offering

9
New cards

Stacking the Deck (ethical)

  • Presenting only one side of a story — the one in their favor

  • Can cause people to raise questions about your motives

10
New cards

Hasty Generalization (logical)

  • inference drawn from insufficient evidence

  • In order to draw valid inferences, you must always have ample evidence and qualify your claims appropriately

11
New cards

Faulty Causality (logical)

  • “After this, therefore because of this”

  • Assuming because one event or action follows another, the first causes the second

12
New cards

Begging the Question (logical) 

  • An argument that begins with the argument that it is trying to prove

  • Is a circular argument that goes nowhere

13
New cards

Equivocation (logical)

  • Half truths or arguments that give lies an honest appearance

  • Based on tricks of language

  • Sometime use contradictory qualifiers

    • tends to be in political aspects

14
New cards

Non Sequitur (logical)

  • an argument whose claims, reasons, or warrents don’t connect logically

  • Often occur when writers omit steps in an otherwise logical chain of reasoning

15
New cards

Straw Man (logical)

  • An argument that is easy to knock down, yet the writer/speaker still claims victory over an opponent (that may not even exist)

  • Politicians tend use this because they want to characterize the positions of their opponents as more extreme than they are

16
New cards

Red Herring (logical)

  • Changes the subject abruptly or introduces an irrelevant claim or fact to throw the readers/listeners off the trail 

  • Used to undermine other peoples arguments

  • Has become a way of saying:

    • “I disagree with your argument”

    • “Your point is irrelevant”

17
New cards

Faulty Analogy (logical)

  • Inaccurate or inconsequential comparisons betwen objects or concepts

18
New cards

Paralipsis (logical)

  • occurs when speakers or writers say they will not talk about something, therefore doing what they said they weren’t going to 

  • It’s a way of getting a point to an argument, through sneaking it in