[Illusory Correlation] - Hamilton and Rose (1980)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/5

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

6 Terms

1
New cards

Aim of Hamilton and Rose (1980)

To investigate how illusory correlations contribute to the maintenance of social stereotypes.

2
New cards

Procedure of Hamilton and Rose (1980)

Performed three experiments:

1. Participants read sets of sentences describing different occupations with adjective pairs (e.g. Doctor w/ smart and wealthy), along with non-stereotypical adjectives.

2. Participants read sets of sentences with adjective pairs either consistent with the stereotypes or unrelated to them.

3. Adjectives were either inconsistent or unrelated

Participants then estimated how often each of the trait adjectives accurately described the members of the occupational group.

3
New cards

Results of Hamilton and Rose (1980)

Participants showed systematic biases to make the perceived correlation and stereotypes more consistent with eachother.

4
New cards

Conclusions of Hamilton and Rose (1980)

Concluded that when two infrequent events occur together, illusory correlations are triggered due to the heightened attention observers pay to them (they're encoded better).

5
New cards

Strengths of Hamilton and Rose (1980)

- Shows a correlation between illusory correlations and stereotypes

- Reduced chance of social desirability bias, as members of groups were not present (increased validity)

6
New cards

Limitations of Hamilton and Rose (1980)

- Assumes that the participants all shared the same stereotypical concepts for each group