1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Introduction:
While government policies on race relations played an important role in shaping responses to racism and discrimination between 1939 and 1979, it is only partially accurate to describe them as the most significant influence. In reality, public attitudes, media influence, grassroots activism, and broader social and economic changes were also highly influential. Government policy often responded to pressure from these sources rather than leading progressive change, especially in the earlier part of the period.
Point 1: Government Policy Played an Important Role from the 1960s Onward
Evidence:
The Race Relations Acts of 1965, 1968, and 1976 outlawed discrimination in public life, housing, employment, and education, and led to the creation of the Commission for Racial Equality.
The 1968 Commonwealth Immigrants Act, however, restricted the entry of non-white Commonwealth citizens, particularly from East Africa, showing the dual nature of policy.
Explain:
Government legislation had a significant impact in formally recognising and combating discrimination, particularly by the 1970s. It helped raise awareness, even if enforcement was often weak.
Counter:
Government action was often reactive to public pressure or unrest, such as the Notting Hill riots (1958) or Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech (1968). Policies were also inconsistent—progressive race relations acts existed alongside restrictive immigration laws.
Link:
Government policy did influence race relations, but its significance lies more in its symbolic role and reaction to events, rather than being the primary driving force of change.
Point 2: Media and Public Opinion Shaped Racial Attitudes Deeply
Evidence:
The media amplified fears of immigration, often using inflammatory headlines in the 1950s and 60s (e.g., Daily Express: “Keep Britain White”).
Enoch Powell's 1968 speech was widely covered and sparked intense public and political debate about immigration and race.
Explain:
The media helped shape public attitudes, creating an environment where hostility and discrimination could flourish—or be challenged—depending on the narrative.
Counter:
Governments did at times resist populist pressures, e.g. Edward Heath dismissed Powell from the Conservative shadow cabinet. Media influence doesn't negate the government’s legislative steps in the 70s.
Link:
Public and media pressure were major influences on race relations and helped drive or shape government responses, suggesting they were at least as significant as the policy itself.
Point 3: Grassroots Activism and Community Resistance Were Critical
Evidence:
Black Power movements and groups like the British Black Panthers (founded in 1968) fought against police brutality, discrimination, and poor housing conditions.
Community mobilisation after events like the Mangrove Nine trial (1970) helped push racism into national awareness.
Explain:
Activism gave minority communities a voice and political presence, pushing the government to act and shifting public attitudes, especially among younger generations.
Counter:
Activism often lacked formal power or political backing and was limited in scale, compared to the legal authority of government.
Link:
Nevertheless, grassroots pressure was a catalyst for government policy, showing that race relations were shaped from the bottom-up as much as top-down.
Point 4: Economic and Social Change Also Influenced Race Relations
vidence:
Post-war labour shortages encouraged immigration, and Black and Asian workers were essential to the NHS and transport sectors.
Economic downturns in the 1970s led to increased racial tension, with minorities often scapegoated for unemployment.
Explain:
Socioeconomic shifts played a crucial role in how racial minorities were perceived and treated—opportunities in the 1950s turned into hostility in the 70s, affecting race relations beyond government control.
Counter:
The government could have used policy to stabilise tensions, but was often slow or reluctant to intervene directly.
Link:
Race relations were shaped as much by structural economic forces as by legislation, showing government policy was just one of several important factors.
Conclusion:
It is only partially accurate to claim that government policy on race relations was the most significant influence on race and race relations from 1939 to 1979. While legislation in the 1960s and 70s formalised anti-discrimination measures and showed state recognition of the issue, such policies were often slow, limited, and reactive. Public attitudes, media influence, grassroots activism, and broader economic and social forces played equally—if not more—important roles in shaping both race relations and the pace of change. Therefore, government policy was important but not the dominant influence during this period.