1/28
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
The 4th Amendment
Protects against warrantless, “unreasonable searches & seizures”
Establishes requirements of “probable cause” for search warrant
Search Warrant
Written order, issued by a judge, to search
4 Sources
Personal observation: police observe or can make an educated inference
Information: information, believed to be reliable, from a victim/witness/informant
Evidence: items in plain view
Association: person associating with known criminals in a known crime area
**Does not need to have all four sources
Particularity Requirement
Specific information on the search
Exactly who, what, when, & here is being searched
Exactly what is being searched for
Seizure
Forcible taking of person and/or property in response to a law violation
4 Categories
Items resulting from a crime (stolen goods)
Inherently illegal items (drugs)
Items deemed “evidence” of a crime (the bloodstained knife)
Items used to commit the crime (lock pick)
Exclusionary Rule
Prohibits use of illegally obtained evidence in court
‘Fruit of the Poisoned Tree’ Rule
Illegally obtained evidence used to obtain other secondary evidence
Secondary evidence is also illegal & prohibited from use
“Inevitable Discovery” Exception
Illegally obtained evidence can be admissible if PD-using lawful means-would have discovered it later
“Good Faith” Exception
Evidence acquired using a technically invalid warrant can be admissible if officer was unaware & acted in “good faith”
Katz v. United States
A search is a governmental intrusion on a citizen’s reasonable expectation of privacy
4th amendment protects people, not places (closed phone booth)
California v. Greenwood
Privacy forfeited when using public trash pickup
Reilly v. California
No warrantless search & seizure of a cell phone’s digital content during arrest
Searches Incidental to Arrest (1st most common)
Search area within an “arm’s reach”
Search of the person
Search allowed because of need for PD to: confiscate weapons & protect evidence from destruction
Consent Searches of Persons (2nd most common)
Person voluntarily gives consent to search person and/or property
Person’s age, intelligence, & physical condition
Whether coercive behavior was used by PD
Location and/or length of PD questioning
Consent Searches of Vehicles
Vehicle =/ home’s reasonable expectation of privacy
Home > Vehicle
Plain View Doctrine
Objects may be seized as evidence without a warrant
4 Necessary Criteria
Item in officer’s view
Officer legally justified to be in the location
Discovery of an item is inadvertent
Officer immediately recognizes the item is illegal in nature
**Must have all four
Stop
“Investigatory stop” where officer briefly detains a person they reasonably believe to be suspicious
Frisk
“Protective measure” where officer pat down/frisk a person’s outer clothing for weapons
Arrest
Criminal suspect taken into custody on criminal charge(s)
“Knock & Announce” Requirement
PD must announce identity & purpose before entering a home (~5 to 25 seconds)
Exigent Circumstances Exception
Certain Conditions when PD does not have to announce
Suspect is armed & poses a violent threat
Person is destroying evidence
Suspect is escaping
Felony in-progress
**Can be any of them
Without a Warrant (most common)
Arrests made at/near a crime scene
Officer witnessed a crime (felony and/or misdemeanor)
5th Amendment
No self-incrimination, right to remain silent
6th Amendment
Right to an attorney
Miranda v. Arizona
Centered on evidence extracted in PD interrogation/questioning
Public knowledge/understanding of key constitutional rights
Every suspect needs protection from PD coercion
Establishes procedural requirement of reading rights to those in police custody
Miranda is Not Required When
Routine booking questions
Witness questioning
Volunteered information, not asked for by PD
Suspect gives private statement to 3rd party; 3rd party tells PD
Routine procedures (stop & frisk, traffic stops)
Voluntarily waive Miranda rights
Understand & acknowledge Miranda rights
“Knowingly & intelligently” waive orally or in writing