1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Varner
Discussion of resuse/recarving of objects
Recarving was not just by circumstance, but was intentional choice of reuse of depictions of condemned/shamed emperors to celebrate famous or current emperors
Tuck
Analysis of Domitian bronze equestrian statue
Reuse of Domitian statue to depict Nerva. Face was cut and reworked (can see line at jaw/hairline that is evidence)
Lack of helmet and armor indicate that he is not in battle
Clothes - comparison to Hellenistic king, Hercules
Authors compared statue to bronze equestrian statue of Alexander the Great from Herculaneum, where he is clearly depicted as being in battle
Incorporation of the hunt into “Virtus” = Philhellenism
Hales
Discussion of depictions of Dionysus in Pompeii
Worship of Dionysus in a Hellenistic way, interest in Greek culture/art
Dionysus as god of wine, and also of madness. Images in Dionystiac mysteries leave a feeling of uneasiness, as the boarders imply a sense of containing Dionysus, and the inevitable breaking of that barrier between the viewer and the drama in the murals
Often depicted with 2 heads, due to contrasting roles as god of cultivation and as chaos/partying
Hope
Roman war and commemoration of deceased
Commemorating deceased from war is relatively new. Triumphs largely ignored the dead, unless a high ranking elite officer died.
Many soldiers who died in battle did not receive a grave, as it took effort/time the surviving soldier’s didn’t have due to war. Lack of technology made it difficult to identify and transport bodies.
Not mourning was a political move to keep spirits up and incentivize people to join military