1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
death of friedrich ebert
28th february 1925
what did the death of friedrich ebert prematurely trigger?
beginning of elections for new president → 1 year earlier than necessary
events of the february 1925 presidential elections
first round candidates included ernst thälmann (KPD) and erich ludendorff (NSDAP)
all 7 candidates failed to secure a majority vote
jarres won the most votes with the spd in 2nd place
jarres withdrew in favour of hindenburg for the 2nd round → both representing right wing parties, hindbenurg had apparently consulted ex-kaiser
spd withdrew their candidate and advised their voters to vote for marx
2nd round → only 3 candidates remained hindenburg, marx and thälmann (left vote was split)
hindenburg won with 48.3%
candidates of the first round of elections
seven candidates
karl jarres → DVP + DNVP
otto braun → SPD
wilhelm marx → centre / ZP
ernst thälmann → KPD
erich ludendorff → NSDAP
candidates in the second round of presidential elections
hindenburg → DVP + DNVP
marx → centre party and represented moderate SPD voters after their hope for tactical voting and withdraw of braun
thälmann → KPD
final results of the presidential election
hindenburg → 48.3%
marx → 45.3%
thälmann → 6.4%
appeal of hindenburg
symbol of germany’s past of militarism and authoritarianism
war hero → revered by the right, regarded his election as the beginning of the restoration of the old order
gave hope for a dramatic step away from ‘weak’ and unstable weimar parliamentary democracy
impacts of hindenburg in the short term
worked hard to achieve appropriate stability
appealed to parties in reichstag, willing to work with him in restoring national unity
temporarily reconciled anti-democratic parties like DNVP, played a more constructive role to making parliamentary democracy function
was loyal to weimar constitution and not abusing his powers for the first five years → used article 48 appropriately
increased legitimacy f the republic in the eyes of right wing voters making it no longer a socialist republic
less extremism and greater stability
german term used to refer to the appointment of hindenburg as chancellor
ersatzkaiser (substitute emperor)
counter argument to hindenburg providing stability in reichstag
political parties continue to put party interest above national unity
failed to reach compromises and make decisions → parties continued to be self serving, had no history of cooperation with each other, had no trust or respect
as a result, coalitions were short lived
hindenburg became impatient with indecision
increasingly used article 48 in the interests of army and nationalist elites
name given to hindenburg from continual abuse of article 48 → explain
“the gravedigger and the undertaker”
went against democracy, providing the doorway to dictatorship making the republic vulnerable to revolution
eventually ended up with hitler being appointed as chancellor
different governments between november 1923 and 1928
6 different governments → displays persistent instability
average length of a coalition government
9 months → display of lack of continuity for republic and instability
minority government
a coalition government that maintains less than 50% of seats in the reichstag
increasingly difficult to enact laws and policy due to lack of mutual agreement or compromise
minority governments between november 1923 and 1928
5 minority governments
no party received an outright majority
after 1923 (end of ruhr crisis and resolution of hyperinflation crisis) what general evidence is there for political stability by 1928?
no attempted coups from left of right
no major political assassinations
extremist parties did not gain mass support
after 1923 (end of ruhr crisis and resolution of hyperinflation crisis) what general evidence is there for political instability by 1928?
extremist parties made a drastic impact on the streets despite not gaining mass support
frequently street fights between the SA (the brownshirts) and the KPD’s Red Front Fighters League
their respective paramilitary groups
the army, civil service, societal elites remained vastly right wing and attempted to secretly rearm and prepare for another war
sign of political stability following may 1928
müller’s grand coalition - lasts nearly 2 years while maintaining a majority in the reichstag
most popular party in 1919
1919 - SPD
had 37.9% of the vote, taken from initial election at the very beginning of the republic
largest percentage votes for a party throughout the republic
represents widespread public desire for a supportive democratic government
most popular reichstag party december 1924
december 1924 - SPD
won 26% vote
following failure of cuno’s government and appointment of stresemann’s as chancellor
most popular reichstag party 1928
1928 - SPD
won 29.8%
votes for pro weimar parties 1928 → represents?
by 1928 72.8% of people voted for pro-weimar parties
following stabilisation of the economy in 1924, thanks to stresemann’s vastly successful 3 step policy
represents a high degree of support and reinstated faith in the weimar democracy despite a rise in the following of extremist parties
reflects high degree of stability in society (respectively more than before)
how did political parties hinder the success of coalition governments, resulting in them being short lived and ineffective?
prioritised the principles and narrow interests of their own parties over making compromises in the best interest of their nation that would be necessary to ensure success
constant bargaining and manoeuvring for power discredited parliamentary democracy, hindered conclusive decisionmaking
germans only able to vote for a party list rather than individual politicians → not a close tie between voters in an area and their elected deputy
developed narrow sectional interest parties that proliferated the reichstag and diluted the vote
how did hindenburg fulfil the german ideals of leadership?
believed to have lacked a charismatic, inspirational leader → a position that hitler would later embody and fulfil through his cult of personality spread widely through propaganda
growing number of germans attracted to the idea of a stronger leader with more authority → had been comfortable in security and tradition it provided
hindenburg helped to fulfil expectations → presents the idea of a democratic autocracy and gives an impression of security
political impact on right wing sympathising organisations
judiciary, civil service, army were not reformed (from ebert-groener pact etc)
organisations were still controlled by conservative elites
influential opinion formers in key positions were lukewarm to democracy but becoming increasingly hostile
involved in many minor issues that prevented unification of republic
e.g. changing the national flag
industrialists resented growing burdens of the welfare state → progressive taxes that had to be paid in high amounts increasing gradually
junkers resented their loss of influence
key evidence of political stability
hindenburg in position of president stabilising polarisation of politics
müller’s grand coalition lasting nearly 2 years instead of average of 9 months
pro-democratic parties received 72.8% vote in 1928
reduction in major political violence → no notable putsches or assassinations
reduction in support for extremist parties
key evidence of political instability
army, civil service, judiciary “lukewarm to democracy” and disillusionment of industrialists
lack of compromise between narrow interested political parties
proliferation of minority coalitions preventing reichstag unity
continuation of street violence between left and right wing paramilitaries
statistics for exponential change in votes for NSDAP
may 1928 - 2.6% vote
july 1932 - 37.4% vote, overtaking the spd, 2nd largest percentage of votes for a party ever in the reichstag
shows rapidly accelerating popularity