extent of weimar political stability

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/27

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

death of friedrich ebert

28th february 1925

2
New cards

what did the death of friedrich ebert prematurely trigger?

  • beginning of elections for new president → 1 year earlier than necessary

3
New cards

events of the february 1925 presidential elections

  • first round candidates included ernst thälmann (KPD) and erich ludendorff (NSDAP)

  • all 7 candidates failed to secure a majority vote

  • jarres won the most votes with the spd in 2nd place

  • jarres withdrew in favour of hindenburg for the 2nd round → both representing right wing parties, hindbenurg had apparently consulted ex-kaiser

  • spd withdrew their candidate and advised their voters to vote for marx

  • 2nd round → only 3 candidates remained hindenburg, marx and thälmann (left vote was split)

  • hindenburg won with 48.3%

4
New cards

candidates of the first round of elections

  • seven candidates

  • karl jarres → DVP + DNVP

  • otto braun → SPD

  • wilhelm marx → centre / ZP

  • ernst thälmann → KPD

  • erich ludendorff → NSDAP

5
New cards

candidates in the second round of presidential elections

  • hindenburg → DVP + DNVP

  • marx → centre party and represented moderate SPD voters after their hope for tactical voting and withdraw of braun

  • thälmann → KPD

6
New cards

final results of the presidential election

hindenburg → 48.3%

marx → 45.3%

thälmann → 6.4%

7
New cards

appeal of hindenburg

  • symbol of germany’s past of militarism and authoritarianism

  • war hero → revered by the right, regarded his election as the beginning of the restoration of the old order

  • gave hope for a dramatic step away from ‘weak’ and unstable weimar parliamentary democracy

8
New cards

impacts of hindenburg in the short term

  • worked hard to achieve appropriate stability

    • appealed to parties in reichstag, willing to work with him in restoring national unity

  • temporarily reconciled anti-democratic parties like DNVP, played a more constructive role to making parliamentary democracy function

  • was loyal to weimar constitution and not abusing his powers for the first five years → used article 48 appropriately

  • increased legitimacy f the republic in the eyes of right wing voters making it no longer a socialist republic

  • less extremism and greater stability

9
New cards

german term used to refer to the appointment of hindenburg as chancellor

ersatzkaiser (substitute emperor)

10
New cards

counter argument to hindenburg providing stability in reichstag

  • political parties continue to put party interest above national unity

  • failed to reach compromises and make decisions → parties continued to be self serving, had no history of cooperation with each other, had no trust or respect

  • as a result, coalitions were short lived

  • hindenburg became impatient with indecision

    • increasingly used article 48 in the interests of army and nationalist elites

11
New cards

name given to hindenburg from continual abuse of article 48 → explain

“the gravedigger and the undertaker”

  • went against democracy, providing the doorway to dictatorship making the republic vulnerable to revolution

  • eventually ended up with hitler being appointed as chancellor

12
New cards

different governments between november 1923 and 1928

6 different governments → displays persistent instability

13
New cards

average length of a coalition government

9 months → display of lack of continuity for republic and instability

14
New cards

minority government

a coalition government that maintains less than 50% of seats in the reichstag

  • increasingly difficult to enact laws and policy due to lack of mutual agreement or compromise

15
New cards

minority governments between november 1923 and 1928

5 minority governments

  • no party received an outright majority

16
New cards

after 1923 (end of ruhr crisis and resolution of hyperinflation crisis) what general evidence is there for political stability by 1928?

  • no attempted coups from left of right

  • no major political assassinations

  • extremist parties did not gain mass support

17
New cards

after 1923 (end of ruhr crisis and resolution of hyperinflation crisis) what general evidence is there for political instability by 1928?

  • extremist parties made a drastic impact on the streets despite not gaining mass support

    • frequently street fights between the SA (the brownshirts) and the KPD’s Red Front Fighters League

    • their respective paramilitary groups

  • the army, civil service, societal elites remained vastly right wing and attempted to secretly rearm and prepare for another war

18
New cards

sign of political stability following may 1928

müller’s grand coalition - lasts nearly 2 years while maintaining a majority in the reichstag

19
New cards

most popular party in 1919

1919 - SPD

  • had 37.9% of the vote, taken from initial election at the very beginning of the republic

  • largest percentage votes for a party throughout the republic

  • represents widespread public desire for a supportive democratic government

20
New cards

most popular reichstag party december 1924

december 1924 - SPD

  • won 26% vote

  • following failure of cuno’s government and appointment of stresemann’s as chancellor

21
New cards

most popular reichstag party 1928

1928 - SPD

  • won 29.8%

22
New cards

votes for pro weimar parties 1928 → represents?

  • by 1928 72.8% of people voted for pro-weimar parties

  • following stabilisation of the economy in 1924, thanks to stresemann’s vastly successful 3 step policy

  • represents a high degree of support and reinstated faith in the weimar democracy despite a rise in the following of extremist parties

  • reflects high degree of stability in society (respectively more than before)

23
New cards

how did political parties hinder the success of coalition governments, resulting in them being short lived and ineffective?

  • prioritised the principles and narrow interests of their own parties over making compromises in the best interest of their nation that would be necessary to ensure success

  • constant bargaining and manoeuvring for power discredited parliamentary democracy, hindered conclusive decisionmaking

  • germans only able to vote for a party list rather than individual politicians → not a close tie between voters in an area and their elected deputy

  • developed narrow sectional interest parties that proliferated the reichstag and diluted the vote

24
New cards

how did hindenburg fulfil the german ideals of leadership?

  • believed to have lacked a charismatic, inspirational leader → a position that hitler would later embody and fulfil through his cult of personality spread widely through propaganda

  • growing number of germans attracted to the idea of a stronger leader with more authority → had been comfortable in security and tradition it provided

  • hindenburg helped to fulfil expectations → presents the idea of a democratic autocracy and gives an impression of security

25
New cards

political impact on right wing sympathising organisations

  • judiciary, civil service, army were not reformed (from ebert-groener pact etc)

  • organisations were still controlled by conservative elites

  • influential opinion formers in key positions were lukewarm to democracy but becoming increasingly hostile

  • involved in many minor issues that prevented unification of republic

    • e.g. changing the national flag

  • industrialists resented growing burdens of the welfare state → progressive taxes that had to be paid in high amounts increasing gradually

  • junkers resented their loss of influence

26
New cards

key evidence of political stability

  • hindenburg in position of president stabilising polarisation of politics

  • müller’s grand coalition lasting nearly 2 years instead of average of 9 months

  • pro-democratic parties received 72.8% vote in 1928

  • reduction in major political violence → no notable putsches or assassinations

  • reduction in support for extremist parties

27
New cards

key evidence of political instability

  • army, civil service, judiciary “lukewarm to democracy” and disillusionment of industrialists

  • lack of compromise between narrow interested political parties

  • proliferation of minority coalitions preventing reichstag unity

  • continuation of street violence between left and right wing paramilitaries

28
New cards

statistics for exponential change in votes for NSDAP

may 1928 - 2.6% vote

july 1932 - 37.4% vote, overtaking the spd, 2nd largest percentage of votes for a party ever in the reichstag

shows rapidly accelerating popularity