1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
fiscal system under the command economy
centralized revenue, centralized expenditure
revenures : came largely from industrial profits raised from the soe
expenditures
determined by the central government, but responsibilities for day to day public administration and social services delegated to local government
→ no professional formal tax administration system
adventages of centralized system
the central government has high authoriitu and can balance the regional distribution of expenditures
challenges of centralized system
1 incentive challenge ; local governments lacked on the effort side, and the autonomy to make regional development related decisions, and the right to claim residual fiscal returns
2 knowledge challenge : local governments are often more aware of local economic characteristics and opportunities
1987 Fiscal responsibility system
the central government introduced a system of fiscal contracts with local government
these contracts stipulated a lump sum remittance to the center from each rpovince, to increase annually by an agreed rate, with any additional revenues accruing
in return the privinces accepted responsibility for meeting their expenditure requirements from retained revenues
step 2: local governments as political entrepreneurs
since the fiscal contracting reform, local governments have gradually transformed from administrative implementers to active organizers and coordinators of local economic development
local governments have gerater flexibility in making economic decisions
have begun to proactively cultivate entreprises, attract investments, and improve local infrastructure
what specific efforts did the local government do (political entrepreneurs)
supporting local firms →favorable policiees, supporting finance, talent recruitment, allocating land,
leverage local endowment recourses → using local knowledge for development → transformation : geographical location, mineral resources, local specialities, scenic spots
attracting foreign and domestic investors → preferential land and tax policies
request projects from central ministries → funding, project approval,
seek other preferrential policies: depending on the region which is determined by the central government
new challenges after the first wave of reforms
declining : central governments revenue / total revenue
declining : total fiscal revenue / GDP
the local governments hide fiscal revenues by shifting the revenues to extra budget revenues
1994 reform : recentralize the fiscal system
tax modernization : symplifying the tax structure, eliminating distortiuonary elements, and increasing transparency
tax sharing system → taxes are assigned to central governmlent, local government or shared
tax administration : national tax administration in China → previously tax bureaus were split into two distinct offices : shared and central VS local, → later merged
tax modernoization
Value Added Tax VAT 17%
business tax : applied services 5%
entreprise profit tax = 33% for SOE, collective and privte entreprises
personal income tax
luxury/ excise tax : cigarettes, alcohol,
fiscal expenditures pre reform era
mostly spent in investments : ordinary facilities, steel mills, machinery plans rather than public goods
fiscal expenditures during the reforms
the budgetary expenditure for social welfare outlays subsequently grew rapidly → education, pension,
local government plays an important role
the new structure
central vertical transfer
the center government collects the majority share of revenue, and local governments are dependent on the center for budgetary transfers
how can the local government raise money post reform (outside of te vertical transfer)
raising revenue from land
sell the land use rights to developers
local government financing vehicles : local governments could borrow egainst expected future revenues
seeking revenue through growth : keep expanding the local economic base