The interactionist approach

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

9 Terms

1
New cards

What is the interactionist approach?

Acknowledges there are biological, psychological and societal factors in the development of SZ

Biological = genetic vulnerability and neurochemical and neurological abnormality

Psychological = stress resulting from life events and daily hassles including poor quality interactions in the family

2
New cards

The diathesis stress model

  • a vulnerabilty to SZ and a stress trigger are necessary to develop SZ

  • One are more underlying factor make a person vulnerable but the onset of the condition is triggered by stresses

3
New cards

What is meant by the terms diathesis and stress?

This model explains that individuals will develop SZ if they have a biological predisposition and if they are exposed to stressful situations

Diathesis - a predisposition to develop a medical condition

Stress - any environmental factor that could trigger the disorder

Plus both of them = schizophrenia

4
New cards

Meehls original model

  • believed diathesis was entirely genetic, the result of a single ‘schizogene’

  • This led to the development of a biologically based schizotypic personality, one characteristic is sensitivity to stress

  • According to Meehl, if a person doesn’t have the schizogene then no amount of stress would lead to SZ. However in carriers of the gene, chronic stress through childhood and adolescence, particularly a SZ mother could result in SZ.

5
New cards

Modern understanding of diathesis

  • now clear that many genes increase genetic vulnerability. There is no single ‘schizogene’

  • Modern views recognise diathesis is not exclusively genetic and includes a range of factors including psychological trauma

  • So trauma can become the diathesis rather than the stressor

  • Read proposed a neurodevelopmental model in which early trauma alters the developing brain. Eg: the hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal system becomes over active and the person is more vulnerable to later stress

  • According to a 2006 study by NIH, trauma mainly affects development of three important parts of your brain; the amygdala, your emotional and instinctual centre; the hippocampus which controls memory and the PFC responsible for regulating emotions and impulses

  • So amygdala goes into overdrive becoming overly sensitive, PFC cannot suppress fear/make relational decisions and the hippocampus perceives everything as a threat

6
New cards

Early understanding of stress

  • in the original diathesis stress model stress was seen as psychological in nature and particularly related to childhood

  • Varies et al found that children who experienced severe trauma before the age of 16 were 3x more likely to develop schizophrenia in later life compared to the general population

  • There was a relationship between the level of trauma and likelihood of developing schizophrenia, with those serverly traumatised as a child being at greater risk

7
New cards

The original diathesis stress model oversimplifies

  • idea of a single schizogene and schizophrenic parenting style as the major source for stress is oversimplified the original model that portrayed diathesis as due to a schizogene and stress due to childhood being oversimplified

  • Multiple genes increase vulnerability, there is no single gene

  • Stress can also come in many forms not just dysfunctional parenting

  • Now believed vulnerability can be caused by early trauma as well as genetic makeup and stress can come in many forms including biological

8
New cards

RWA; support fro combo treatments

  • standard practise in the UK is to combine the drugs and CBT/family therapy. Turkington et al point out that it is perfectly possible to believe in biological causes and still practice CBT to relieve symptoms

  • Terrier (2004) 315 patients were randomly allocated to a medication + CBT group, medication + supportive counselling or a control group

  • Patients in the two combination groups showed lower symptom levels than control, although there was no difference in rates of hospital readmission

  • This and other studies show that there is clear advantage to adopting an interactionist approach

  • Although combining therapies increases the cost of treatment, the greater effectiveness can make combination therapies more cost effective in the long term

9
New cards

We don’t know exactly how diathesis and stress work

  • strong evidence to suggest some sort of underlying vulnerability coupled with stress can lead to SZ

  • Also have well informed suggestions for how vulnerabilities and stress might lead to symptoms

  • However we do not yet fully understand the mechanisms by which the symptoms of SZ appear and how both vulnerability and stress produces them

  • Eg: diathesis - stress models typically focus on stressful events that occur close to the onset of schizophrenia (eg; cannabis ), but it may be possible that maladaptive methods of coping with stress developed ad children affects resilience in later life.