1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
atomic sentence
most basic form of a sentence; cannot be further broke up by logical connectives
logical connectives
connect sentences logically to form other sentences
premises
first two sentences of a logical argument
conclusion
third sentence of a logical argument
valid argument
when the conclusion follows from the premises
Invalid argument
Argument where the conclusion does not follow from the premises (true premises and false conclusion)
Counterexample
Case where an argument is invalid
Case
hypothetical scenario where each sentence in an argument is either true or false
object language
language we study
meta-language
language that is used to study the object language
main connective
the last logical connective used in the construction of a sentence
Negation
¬, ‘it is not the case that’
conjunction
∧, and/but
disjunction
∨, either/or
conditional
→, if…then
biconditional
↔, if and only if / iff
Inclusive ‘or’
what disjunction connective represents; either A or B or both
exclusive ‘or’ (XOR)
cannot be used with disjunction symbol; means A or B but not both
truth value
determines if a sentence is true (T) or false (F)
antecedent
beginning of a conditional statement (after ‘if’)
consequent
end of a conditional statement (after ‘then’)
Valuation
assigns truth values (T or F) to sentence letters
Entailment
another way of saying that an argument is valid; A and B entail C = A and B therefore C is valid; works if every valuation makes at least one premise false or makes conclusion true
sound argument
when all the premises of an argument are true and the argument is valid
How to write ‘neither…nor’
(-A /\ -B) or -(A \/ B)
How to write unles A,B
(-A —> B) or (A \/ B)
exclusive or symbolization
(A∨B) ∧ ¬(A∧B)
Tautology
iff A is true on every valuation (column)
Contradiction
is false on every valuation
Equivalence
Iff for every valuation, the truth values of A and B agree, and there is no valuation in which they have opposite truth values
Joint satisfiability
A1, A2,…An are this iff there is some valuation that makes them all true (row)