1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Nebraska Press Association vs Stuart
1976
Gag order was too vague, so the press could still cover it
Highly publicized murder trial
Judge could instead keep jury sequestered (isolated from public and media) during trial
Stromberg v Cali
1931
Cali law banned communist flag
SC ruled law was UNCONSTITUTIONAL bc it punished legal opposition to the gov
US vs O’Brien
1968
4 men burned draft cards in protest of Vietnam, arrested bc supposed to have cards at all times by law
SC ruled law was constitutional bc
served valid government interest
Men could’ve protested another way
Not intended to suppress speech
Tinker v Des Moines
1969
Students suspended for wearing armbands protesting Vietnam
SC said it wasn’t disruptive, students “don’t shed rights to freedom of speech at school gate”
Speech at school does end when it results in disruptions or violates others’ rights
Texas v Johnson
1989
Protester burned US flag, against Texas law
SC said law unconstitutional bc infringed on free speech
Reno v ACLU
1997
SC said law prohibiting distribution of INTERNET ADULT MATERIAL was unconstitutional
New York Times Co vs Sullivan
1964
SC said story about Alabama police officer was protected
Even if it was wrong, since NYT could’ve not known
Bethel v Fraser
1986
Schools can punish lewd/indecent speech
Student made an inappropriate speech at an assembly
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier
1988
Speech regulated in school-sponsored activities
Near v Minnesota
1931
Newspaper called officials gangsters, against state law
SC ruled the law was a limit on press (unconstitutional)
NYT Co vs US
1971, aka Pentagon Papers
Pentagon employee leaked to NYT a gov report ab Vietnam war, Gov tried to stop its publishing
SC let them publish
Justice William O Douglas “purpose of 1st amendment to stop suppression of embarrassing info, serve the GOVERNED, bare Gov secrets and inform people”
Schenck vs US
1919
Socialist arrested for printing anti-WWI leaflets
SC ruled against Schenck, “presented a clear and present danger”
Gitlow vs NY
1925
SC ruled speech can be restricted ONLY if it has tendency to lead to illegal action
Whitney v California
1927
SC said Gov can ban speech that threatens to overthrow Gov by unlawful means
Brandenburg V Ohio
1969
Speech that generally advocates violence is protected
Only “inciting immediate lawlessness” is banned
KKK member advocated violence, but didn’t incite it
Nazi Party Rally in Skokie, Illinois
1977
Locals demanded they pay $350,000 bond for a parade permit
Courts sided with Nazis, saying high bond restricted free speech and assembly