1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
DSM-5 diagnosis of SZ
1 positive symptom for atleast 3 months
Holistic assessment of symptoms
Takes into account various factors when diagnosing e.g personality disorders or functioning levels
ICD diagnosis of SZ
2+ negative symptoms for atleast a month
Reductionist assessment of symptoms
First rank symptoms (a specific list of symptoms for SZ only)
Negative symptoms of SZ definition
A loss of usual abilities and experiences
Negative symptoms of SZ examples
Alovition = reduced drive/motivation, lack of energy
Alogia/speech poverty = reduced quality/amount of speech, delayed verbal responses
Disorganized speech = incohherent, slurring, change topic mid sentence, stop talking completely
Positive symptoms of SZ defintion
Additional experiences beyond those of ordinary existence
Positive symptoms of SZ examples
Hallucinations = unusual sensory experiences (can relate to any sense but auditory/visual are the most common)
Delusions/paranoia = false/irrational beliefs not based in reality (believing one is an important historical/religious figure is common)
Disorganized speech = speak out stream of thoughts, slur/talk quickly (links to dopamine hypothesis)
Disorganized behaviour = strange, unpredictable actions that interfere w/ daily functioning
Inter-rater reliability of SZ
Extent to which 2 assessors agree on the same diagnosis (independently)
Symptoms of SZ in the same patient may be interpreted differently
Lack of clarity between ICD/DSM
Study had 2 psychiatrists diagnose 100 patients using ICD/DSM:
Psy 1 DSM = 26, ICD = 44
Psy 2 DSM = 13, ICD = 24
Test re-test reliability of SZ
Whether tests used to diagnose SZ are consistent overtime
37% concordance rate in test re-test diagnosis of SZ
Bc symptoms are inconsistent & patients present differently
Predictive validity of SZ
Diagnosis leads to successfull treatment = valid
SZ = low predictive validity
Only 10% of SZ patients achieve significant, lasting improvements = recovery differs a lot
Descriptive validity of SZ
Patients diagnosed w/ diff disorders should have diff symptoms
SZ = low descriptive validity
SZ has a huge symptom overlap w/ disorders like depression & bipolar
Some patients show symptom of SZ but don’t meet diagnostic criteria
Aetiological validity of SZ
All patients w the same disorder should have same cause to be valid
SZ = low aetiological validity
Aetiologically heterogenous = no one cause
SZ co-morbidity issues
when 2 or more conditions occur tgt
Study = ½ patients w SZ also had depression/substance abuse
Confusing diagnosis bc patient may have severe depression and be diagnosed w SZ or vice versa
SZ gender bias issues
since 1980s, men = more likely to be diagnosed w SZ (significantly)
Bc men = more likely to have an emotional outburst/breakdown compared to women
Maybe bc men are raised to not be emotional (stereotypical)
Women typically function better = missed symptoms = suffer 4 life bc couldn’t be diagnosed
SZ cultural bias issues
ppl w african origin = more likely to be diagnosed w SZ
Bc talking to ancestors can be classed as a positive symptom = misdiagnosis
Rosenhan SZ study
8 ppl w/ no history of mental illness
Go to hospital and report only 1 symptom = hearing voices = all diagnosed w SZ (didn’t report more symptoms)
Admitted & kept for avg 19 days before getting discharged
Follow up:
Sent almost 200 genuine patients
Quite a few staff and psychiatrists rated real patients as fake
Shows how the diagnosis of SZ is unreliable and invalid
Biological explanation of SZ
Polygenetic = many candidate genes can cause SZ
Aetiologically heterogenous = diff combos of diff genes can cause SZ
Candidate genes = COMT & DRD4
Gottesman et al (1990s)
large scale family study
MZ twins = 48% concordance rate
DZ twins = 17% concordance rate
Both parents had SZ = 46% chance of SZ in kid
1 parent had SZ = 16% chance of SZ in kid
Ripke et al (2014)
Meta-analysis of 37k SZ patients
108 diff genetic variations linked w increased risk of SZ
Includes many genes which code for dopamine functioning
COMT & DRD4 genes
Associated w/ excess dopamine in specific receptors
Causes positive symptoms
Bio explanation strengths (