The Legal System Exam 3 Pt. 2

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/52

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

53 Terms

1
New cards

jury nullification:

verdict in contravention of law

2
New cards

venire:

panel of prospective jurors

3
New cards

voir dire:

“to see, to say”, selection of jurors. challenges: peremptory v. cause

4
New cards

what happened in Batson v. Kentucky (1986)

race could not be a factor in voir dire, expanded to civil cases in 1991

5
New cards

J.E.B v. Alabama (1994)

Batson ruling expanded to include gender

6
New cards

Batson challenge:

1) moving party establishes prima facie showing of unlawful use of preemptory strike 2) responding party provides race-neutral basis for strike

7
New cards

preemptory strike

no reason except on the basis of race or gender

8
New cards

briefly list the civil procedure of a trial (8)

jury sworn in, opening statement, plaintiff’s case, directed verdict, defense case, closing arguments, jury instructions, deliberation

9
New cards

unanimous in federal v state court

required in federal, somewhat required in state. in PA must be 5/6 for verdict

10
New cards

Allen charge

judge calls jury out and instructs them to deliberate until a verdict is reached

11
New cards

what happens if allen charge unsuccessful?

hung jury/mistrial imposed, case is retried

12
New cards

the admissibility of evidence is…

question of law for judge

13
New cards

probative v. prejudicial:

probative: relevance, prejudicial: inflames juries’ emotion

14
New cards

who has privilege in evidence? (and its excpetions)

martial, attorney-client, clergy, doctor-patient. exceptions are crime-fraud, public safety, waiver 

15
New cards

true or false: circumstantial evidence is just as valid as direct evidence

true

16
New cards

hearsay:

out of court statement offered for truth being asserted

17
New cards

what are the exceptions to hearsay:

excited utterance, dying declaration, business records, statement on medical treatment

18
New cards

what is true of polygaphs in P.A.

always inadmissible

19
New cards

motions in Limine

bringing pieces of evidence in advance that shouldn’t be admitted

20
New cards

probable cause:

likely (50% or more) than not crime was committed and that evidence of crime is present

21
New cards

what is key under criminal procedure?

must have gov agents and reasonable exception of privacy for search to be protected under 4th amendmentnt

22
New cards

exceptions to criminal procedure:

consent, police impound of car, exigent circumstances, plain sight

23
New cards

probable cause

more likely a crime was committed and that the person arrested did it

24
New cards

seizure/arrest

under totality of circumstances person doesnt feel the need to leave

25
New cards

what are the factors under seizure/arrest? (4)

show of authority, handcuffs, forceful language, physical contact

26
New cards

whats required under a stop and frisk?

reasonable suspicion

27
New cards

reasonable suspicion:

particularized and reasonable belief that criminal activity is afoot (btw mere speculation and probable cause)

28
New cards

what’s the deal with Miranda rights?

only given when police ask questions, includes follow up questions

29
New cards

exclusionary rule

evidence obtained in violation of 4th Amendment is thrown out

30
New cards

what is the role of the prosecutor?

responsible for showing justice and truth

31
New cards

what does the Brady Material deal with?

exculpatory evidence; evidence that shows innocence

32
New cards

the 6th Amendment grants what 3 things:

right to speedy, public and impartial jury

33
New cards

right to unanimous verdict:

not addressed in B.O.R., federal court: protected through common law, state court: not constitutionality protected until 2020

34
New cards

what are the 3 pivotal trial decision for criminal defendants?

plead guilty, cooperate with government or testify

35
New cards

North Carolina v. Alford (1970)

alford either could plea guilty or face time, he voluntarily plead guilty

36
New cards

Alford plea:

criminal defendant pleads guilty even though they’re factually innocent

37
New cards

substantial assistance:

significant useful info that is complete and true, given in a timely manner. one faces injury or risk of injury telling such

38
New cards

what are the two factors of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines?

offense gravity score and criminal history

39
New cards

what is the goal of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines?

alleviate sentencing disparities

40
New cards
41
New cards

determinate v. indeterminate sentencing

knows exactly how much time youll get vs. a range, minimum and maximum

42
New cards

fines v. restitution

fines: punitive measure restitution: restores the victim

43
New cards

what is imminent about the the first appeal?

constitutional right to counsel applies to the 1st appeal only

44
New cards

what’s true about second chances in appeallate court?

no do-over unless its a trial de novo

45
New cards

what’s true about defendants and appellate court?

only defendant’s can appeal adverse verdict, gov cannot appeal acquittal due to Double Jeopardy Clause

46
New cards

harmless v. reversible error:

harmless: little things v. reversible: big errors that can reverse a verdict (guilt doesn’t change, case is retried)

47
New cards

what is the percentage of successful appeals

less than 10%

48
New cards

habeus corpus petitons:

request to have case go from state to federal court

49
New cards

interlocutory appeal:

allows either side to appeal during trial to an appellate court

50
New cards

clemency:

governor or president can reduce punishment after criminal conviction

51
New cards

governor deals with ____, president deals with _____

state convictions, federal convictions

52
New cards

pardon:

relieves one of all guilt

53
New cards

commutation:

lowers sentence without exoneration of guilt