1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Stermer v Lawson
Consent, Knowledge of precise risk must be present for Volenti
Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital
Consent, informed consent on remote consequences of the D's actions are not required in Medicine. (E.g complications in 1% of cases)
Jayes v IMI (Kynoch) Ltd
Under Con Neg Damages can be reduced by 100%
Froom v Butcher
Claimant contributorily negligent for failing to wear a seatbelt
Lord Denning:
If seatbelt would have avoided injury, reduce damages by 25%
If it would have reduced injury, reduce by 15%
Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945
allows the court to evaluate the Cl's own negligence and reduce the damages by the percentage of this contributory negligence i.e. a fair distribution of wealth.