1/99
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Issue Importance
How much weight voters assign to specific political topics when deciding whom to vote for.
Issue Voting
Voters use the relative importance of issues to guide their electoral choices.
Salience
The degree of public attention an issue receives (through media, political discourse, etc.).
Elite Influence (Zaller's RAS Model)
Voters receive information from elites, accept or reject it based on prior predispositions, and sample it when answering survey questions.
Issue Ownership
Political parties may 'own' certain issues (e.g., Republicans on immigration or national security; Democrats on healthcare or reproductive rights).
Open-Ended Questions
Questions like 'What is the most important problem facing the country?' used in surveys.
Rating/Ranking Scales
Respondents rate or rank issues by importance.
Question Wording
Precise wording is crucial in surveys to avoid conflating personal importance with perceived severity of a problem.
Response Order & Format
The order of questions can bias responses; survey design must minimize this risk.
Quadratic Voting
Innovative methods being explored to better capture the intensity with which voters prioritize issues.
Media and Political Messaging
The amount and tone of media coverage can boost the salience of issues.
External Events
Crises (e.g., economic downturns, pandemics) can temporarily elevate the importance of related issues.
Example of External Events
After the Dobbs decision, abortion surged in importance among many voters.
Personal Experiences
Direct encounters (e.g., personal economic hardship, exposure to immigration issues) can heighten the importance of an issue.
Demographics
Factors such as age, gender, education, and ethnicity influence how issues are prioritized.
Influence on Vote Choice
Voters are more likely to support candidates who align with their prioritized issues.
Shifts in Issue Importance
Changes in concern over issues (e.g., immigration or healthcare) can alter electoral dynamics.
Campaign Strategy
Parties use polling data on issue importance to tailor messages and focus resources on key issues.
Issue Publics
Groups that are highly motivated by specific issues, essential for mobilization.
Feedback Mechanism
Polling on issue importance not only reflects voter sentiment but also influences political discourse, potentially creating self-reinforcing cycles.
Sampling Bias
Nonresponse bias may skew results if certain groups (e.g., less politically engaged voters) are underrepresented.
Response Bias
Respondents might overstate the importance of issues they believe are socially desirable.
Measurement Errors
Differentiating between how 'big' a problem is perceived and how 'important' it is can be challenging.
Snapshot in Time
Fluctuations in public opinion (due to external events) mean that polls capture a 'snapshot' in time, which may not reflect longer-term priorities.
Question Framing Effects
The design and framing of survey questions can inadvertently elevate or diminish the importance of specific issues.
Abortion Importance
Following the Dobbs decision, surveys indicate a sharp rise in the importance of abortion rights, particularly among Democratic voters.
Economic Issues
Economic issues often top the list of concerns (as seen in Gallup polls), while immigration has become increasingly salient, especially in border states.
Gender Gaps
Studies show differences in issue importance between men and women, influencing partisan voting patterns (e.g., women more likely to prioritize healthcare and abortion, men more likely to emphasize national security).
Partisan Divides
Different groups prioritize issues differently—for example, Republicans and Democrats often disagree on which issues are most critical, shaping their vote choices.
Issue Salience
Explain the difference between issue salience and issue importance in the context of public opinion polling.
Political Elites Influence
Discuss how political elites and media coverage influence issue importance among voters.
Methodological Challenges
Evaluate the methodological challenges in measuring issue importance and suggest ways to overcome these challenges.
Impact of Abortion on Politics
Analyze the impact of rising issue importance of abortion on the political strategies of Democratic candidates post-Dobbs.
Issue Importance
Issue importance is a central concept in understanding voter behavior and the political process.
Polling as a Tool
Despite methodological challenges, polling remains a critical tool for gauging which issues drive electoral decisions and how parties can align their platforms with voter priorities.
Literary Digest Poll
Conducted in the 1930s, notably the 1936 poll that predicted a landslide for Alf Landon against FDR.
Nonrandom Sampling
Used lists from telephone directories, automobile registrations, and magazine subscriptions.
Selection Bias
These sources overrepresented wealthier, more-prosperous segments—who were more likely to favor Landon.
Consequences of Literary Digest Poll
The poll's predictions were disastrously off; FDR won by a huge margin.
Lesson Learned from Literary Digest Poll
Demonstrated the crucial importance of using a representative, random sample to accurately gauge public opinion.
Random Sampling Definition
Random (Probability) Sampling: A method where every individual in the target population has a known, nonzero chance of being selected.
Representativeness
Ensures that diverse opinions from all segments of the population are captured.
Reduces Bias
Minimizes systematic errors that can occur if certain groups are over- or underrepresented.
Application of Random Sampling
Underpins the reliability of polls—most high-quality surveys use random sampling methods to generate credible, generalizable data.
Weighting in Polls
Adjusting Sample Imbalances: Corrects for disproportionate responses by rebalancing the sample to match known population demographics (age, gender, education, etc.).
Assigning Weights
Each respondent is given a weight so that groups that are underrepresented have a larger impact on the final result, and vice versa.
Over-Reliance in Weighting
Incorrect or insufficient weighting can still lead to biased estimates.
Complexity in Weighting
The choice of variables and weighting method (e.g., raking or post-stratification) requires careful methodological consideration.
Margin of Error (MoE)
A statistic expressing the amount of random sampling error in a survey's results.
Sample Size
Larger samples reduce the margin of error.
Variability in Responses
Higher variability increases uncertainty.
Interpretation of Margin of Error
A margin of error indicates the range within which the true population value likely lies (commonly set at a 95% confidence level).
Example of Margin of Error
If a poll reports 50% support with a ±3% margin of error, the true support is likely between 47% and 53%.
Importance of Margin of Error
Critical for understanding the reliability and precision of poll estimates, especially in close contests.
Collective Action Problem
Individuals might not vote or participate in politics because the cost of individual action seems high relative to the small chance of influencing outcomes.
Role of Political Parties
Parties organize and mobilize voters by aggregating diverse interests.
Incentivization by Political Parties
Provide benefits (e.g., policy promises, patronage) that encourage collective participation.
Information Provided by Political Parties
Simplify complex policy debates and signal which issues a party prioritizes.
Outcome of Political Parties
By overcoming free-rider issues, parties help ensure that collective preferences are translated into electoral participation.
Paradox of Voting
Individual votes have a negligible chance of affecting the outcome, yet millions vote.
Civic Duty
Many voters see voting as a moral or civic responsibility.
Social Pressure in Voting
Voting may confer social status or be a norm in one's community.
Expressive Benefit of Voting
Voting provides satisfaction from participating in democracy, even if the impact is minimal.
Theoretical Insights on Voting
The paradox raises questions about rational choice theory in political behavior and highlights the role of non-instrumental motivations in voting.
Structural Barriers for Third Parties
Duverger's Law: Plurality (first-past-the-post) electoral systems tend to favor a two-party system.
Winner-Take-All System
In single-member districts, only the candidate with the most votes wins, which disadvantages smaller parties.
Strategic Voting
Voters often choose the 'lesser of two evils' to avoid wasting their vote on a candidate unlikely to win.
Institutional Constraints for Third Parties
Ballot access laws, debate rules, and campaign finance regulations make it difficult for third parties to compete.
The spoiler effect
Voters fear that voting for a third party could inadvertently help elect the candidate they like least.
Legitimacy and Accountability
Elections provide a mechanism for citizens to choose their representatives, ensuring that government authority derives from the will of the people.
Policy Direction
Elections allow voters to express preferences over public policies, influencing the direction of government action.
Conflict Resolution
Elections serve as a peaceful means of resolving political differences and transferring power.
Information Gathering
Elections function as a feedback loop for both voters and politicians—voters assess performance, and parties adjust platforms accordingly.
Symbolic Function
Elections reinforce democratic values by engaging citizens in the political process and promoting civic participation.
Median Voter Theorem
The median voter theorem posits that in a majority-rule voting system with single-peaked preferences, the candidate or party whose position is closest to that of the median voter is most likely to win.
Key Assumptions of Median Voter Theorem
Voter preferences are distributed along a single ideological dimension and preferences are single-peaked.
Implications for Political Competition
Candidates tend to converge toward the median voter's position to capture the decisive swing vote.
Nationalization
In political contexts, nationalization refers to the process by which political parties, issues, and electoral contests increasingly focus on national-level concerns rather than local or regional issues.
Origins of Nationalization
Modernization and media, economic globalization, and centralized campaigning contribute to the nationalization of politics.
Economic Globalization
Economic integration and national policy challenges make national-level policy debates more salient.
Centralized Campaigning
Higher campaign budgets and national fundraising encourage parties to run uniform national campaigns.
Implications of Nationalization
Voters see elections as contests over broad, national policies, which may overshadow local issues.
Single-Peaked Preferences
Each voter has one most-preferred position, and utility declines as positions move away from this peak.
Downs' classic work
An Economic Theory of Democracy provides a foundational discussion of the median voter theorem.
Polarization
Polarization is the process by which political opinions, identities, and policy preferences become more extreme and divided, resulting in greater ideological distance between political parties and their supporters.
Negative Partisanship
Negative partisanship occurs when voters' political behavior is driven more by opposition to the other party than by support for their own party's positive platform.
Implications of Negative Partisanship
Voters may consistently vote against the opposing party even if they are only lukewarm about their own. This dynamic reinforces division and can hinder consensus-building in a democracy.
Democratic Backsliding
Democratic backsliding refers to the gradual decline or erosion of democratic institutions, norms, and practices. This process may include weakening checks and balances, reducing civil liberties, or undermining the rule of law.
Incentives Under Fierce Competition
Intense partisan competition can push incumbents or ruling coalitions to adopt anti-democratic tactics—such as curtailing judicial independence or undermining media freedoms—to secure electoral advantage.
Race to the Bottom
When every party is in a tight contest, there is a risk that they will sacrifice democratic norms (e.g., by suppressing opposition) to win votes.
Erosion of Norms
Extreme polarization makes compromise difficult and increases the temptation to use power unilaterally, even if it erodes democratic checks and balances.
Partisan Hostility
Heightened animosity between parties can result in less tolerance for dissenting views and more acceptance of undemocratic measures if they benefit one's own side.
Forbearance
Forbearance is the practice of exercising restraint and not exploiting legal or institutional opportunities for partisan gain—even when technically possible.
Connection of Forbearance to Backsliding
When political actors abandon forbearance, they may push institutions to their limits or exploit loopholes to entrench their power.
Erosion of Forbearance
The erosion or loss of forbearance is a critical signal of democratic backsliding because it indicates that political elites are willing to prioritize short-term gains over the long-term health of democratic institutions.
Median Voter Theorem
Explains candidate convergence around the preferences of the median voter in majority-rule systems.
Nationalization
Refers to the shift from local to national focus in party politics, driven by media, economic globalization, and centralized campaigning.
Growing Ideological Distance
Describes the growing ideological distance between political groups, with negative partisanship highlighting opposition-driven voting behavior.
Erosion of Democratic Institutions
Involves the gradual erosion of democratic institutions and norms.
Anti-Democratic Tactics
Competition and polarization can incentivize anti-democratic tactics, while the loss of forbearance accelerates backsliding.