Unit 3 LEGL 2700

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/295

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

296 Terms

1
New cards
Intellectual property includes the topics of:
justification, importance, competition, capturing
2
New cards
Kept secret:
Commercially valuable because it is secret and subject to reasonable steps to keep it secret
3
New cards
Economic value
Something has economic value because it is secret and subject to reasonable steps to keep it secret
4
New cards
Trade Secret
A common way of asserting property or knowledge based on tangible resources.
5
New cards
Uniform Trade Secrets Act-
defines a trade secret as information, technique, or process. It can also include marketing sales, etc. and need not be unique.
6
New cards
A trade secret audit is used to identify
confidential knowledge-based resources
7
New cards
In order to preserve secrecy:
lock written material, secure computer-stored knowledge, impose confidentiality restrictions, etc
8
New cards
reverse engineering
putting something out, and someone reverse creates it; patents can help to dissuade this from happening and is exempted from misappropriation
9
New cards
Al Minor & Associates, Inc. v. Martin, 881 N.E. 2d 850 (Ohio 2008):
Martin is an employee at-will at Al Minor & Associates (he doesn't have a contract or non-complete). Martin decides after a few years at AMA to start his own business and a year later, he leaves AMA. When he leaves he doesn't take any documents or save any papers from his work, but memorizes information for 15 of AMA clients for his own company. AMA sues for monetary and injunctive relief (order him to stop). The court rules that there is no provision that suggests for trade secrets between information from a tangible form and what has been memorized. He knew it was a secret and confidential, and still memorized it and approached those people, and Martin lost the lawsuit.
10
New cards
Court Case: Al Minor & Associates, Inc. v. Martin, 881 N.E. 2d 850 (Ohio 2008):
Memorized information can in fact be a trade violation
11
New cards
Misappropriation
when one improperly acquires or discloses secret information
12
New cards
Independent creation is exempted from
Misappropriation
13
New cards
Trade secrets can be protected
forever
14
New cards
Confidentiality contracts:
Forbid employees from disclosing knowledge obtained in the workplace. Employers can enforce agreements not to compete only when there is a valid business purpose for the contract
15
New cards
Trade owner may seek money damages
If an employee under a confidentiality contract misappropriates
16
New cards
EAA act
Covers criminal prosecution for confidentiality contracts
17
New cards
Many companies do not allow what in meetings?
carrying/using cell phones, usb/flash drive, notes derived during meetings
18
New cards
Document markings
Documents generated should possess appropriate "markings" to imply what is considered a trade secret or protected data
19
New cards
Patent law includes:
new invention and legal monopoly
20
New cards
A first step in protecting trade secrets is to:
Identify confidential knowledge based resources
21
New cards
What does a trade secret audit identify?
All the valuable forms of information possessed by businesses and they do not need to be unique
22
New cards
Patents last for how long?
A limited period of time, 20 years from the date the application is filed in the Patent and Trademark Office
23
New cards
To obtain a patent, an investor must:
Pay a filing fee and file an application with the PTO
24
New cards
Under patent law a new invention is a
legal monopoly
25
New cards
Utility Patent
New, non-obvious, useful processes, machines, compositions of matter or improvements thereof
26
New cards
Design Patent
New, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture
27
New cards
Plant Patent
New, variety of plant that can be produced asexually
28
New cards
Obtaining a patent includes what steps?
File application, filing fee, explain invention, show difference from prior art, describe patentable aspects, and evaluation by the patent examiner
29
New cards
Novelty
Something new and different from the prior art
30
New cards
Nonobviousness
Ability of an invention to produce surprising or unexpected results
31
New cards
Utility
Must do something useful
32
New cards
Patent Enforcement:
If someone sees a patent owner doing something seemingly unallowed by their patent
33
New cards
Overalapping rights provide an opportunity for
firms to purchase patent rights and sue companies-Patent Trolls (term applied to a business that obtains the rights of one or more patents to profit, and buys many patents and sues people for infringement of their patents)
34
New cards
Grace period for patents:
one year
35
New cards
Patent owner can sue against
infringement for injunction and damages
36
New cards
Owning a patent does not give the right to
own and import a whole product, businesses have to pay the licensing fee for parts of the product
37
New cards
UGARF
gets many patents every year and own the patents for inventions made at UGA (manuals are copyrighted by the UGA, things produced by labs on campus are owned by UGARF, etc)
38
New cards
Patents can be invalid if:
the paperwork does not meet requirements or if the subject matter of the patent was not right at all
39
New cards
If someone has discovered and not invented this
doesn't count as eligible for a patent (ex. If you take a flower, extract a new element, and create a salve, that is patentable, but just discovering the flower is not)
40
New cards
Patents can not
lockdown an entire field of discovery
41
New cards
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. 133 S.Ct.2107 (2013).
Myriad created a way to treat breast cancer through using the genes BRCA-1 and 2 to reduce breast cancer. The Association for Molecular Pathology sued and stated that you cannot patent DNA. It was founded that abstract ideas, naturally occurring things, etc are not patentable
42
New cards
Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014)
The Alice Corporation had several patents to mitigate risks like security trades. The patent that they had allowed computers to act as a third party to allow both parties to proceed in transactions and were sued by CLS on whether they had subject matter that was patentable. CLS claimed that they are mere abstract ideas a computer is exercising, not an invention. The Supreme Court ruled that this was just an abstract idea and there was no layer of incentive act, and therefore Alice Corporation was not eligible for a patent
43
New cards
Trademarks
Marks on what is produced to represent the origin of goods and services → Recognizability or distinctiveness → Protection against confusion
44
New cards
Service marks (SM)
Marks associated with a service rather than a product. Used for advertising a service
45
New cards
Certification marks:
Used by groups to show that products meet certain standards or characteristics (like mark for gluten free, fair trade certified, etc.)
46
New cards
Collective mark:
Used by an organization, should only be used by the members of that particular association
47
New cards
Trade Dress:
The look or design of a product or service. Applies to the total image like the layout, color scheme, furniture, and distinctiveness
48
New cards
Sound Trademarks "Sound Marks":
Certain shows/channels/movies play sound marks before showing something on their channel (for example the sound mark for NBC news)
49
New cards
Trademark Registration
Usage of mark in interstate commerce is required for registration with PTO
50
New cards
What are reasons PTO can deny registration?
- Same or similar to another mark
51
New cards
- Prohibited or reserved names or designs
52
New cards
- Names or likeness without permission (to use a president's name, there has to be permission from the wife/family)
53
New cards
- Descriptive (like salty crackers)
54
New cards
- Generic
55
New cards
What were previous reasons PTO could deny registration that were taken down?
If it was disparaging, or immoral and scandalous
56
New cards
Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S. ___, 137 S.Ct.1744 (2017):
This case involved a band made up of people of Asian descent, and they wanted to call themselves "The Slants," claiming they were reclaiming a marginalized term, but the Court stated that they could not use this name because it demeans on the basis of race, gender, sex, etc. The justice at the Supreme Court decided that the disparagement clause in the Lanham Act was discriminating on the Court's part because people should have the right to express their thoughts in regards to disparaging statements.
57
New cards
Iancu v. Brunetti, 588 U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct.2294 (2019).
A brand tried to use an abbreviation on t-shirts, FUCT and were sued because it seemed like immoral speech. The question of this case was whether Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which prohibits the federal registration of "immoral" or "scandalous acts"
58
New cards
How is a trademark registered?
PTO places the mark in the Official Gazaette
59
New cards
Registered on the Principal Register if the mark is acceptable
60
New cards
If listed on the Supplemental Register for five years and acquires a secondary meaning, a name or descriptive term can acquire full trademark status
61
New cards
Law protects the owner of a trademark from
unauthorized use of the mark
62
New cards
Remedies for infringement of trademarks:
damages and injunctions and orders to destroy infringing products
63
New cards
Generic trademarks cannot and why
be protected; a trademark becomes generic if the brand becomes synonymous in the consumer's mind with a good or service
64
New cards
Jack Daniel's Properties Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 599 U.S. ___ (2023).
A brand made a chewable whiskey dogtoy (with dog poop on the bottle) that was designed to look exactly like the Jack Daniels whiskey bottle (stating that it was a parody). Jack Daniels didn't want their alcohol to be associated with dog poop and that people might be confused or think that Jack Daniel had something to do with this.
65
New cards
Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store:
Kraft foods sells cheese under the name Cracker Barrel (cheddar cheese), and Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, the restaurant chain, wanted to come into the grcoery store with their own products, including ham, meet, cheese, etc. Kraft Foods stated that if they do this, people may think Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's food is theirs and have bad thoughts against the food, and think that it was Kraft's, resulting in people stopping buying their products. Justice Posner stated that the issue is that these products will be in the same stores and since most people buying these are poor and its harder for them to understand things, they put an injunction on Old Country Store. Cracker Barrel Old Country store was eventually allowed to be put in grocery stores, but only after they changed the branding on their products in stores saying "Old Country Store,".
66
New cards
Costco v. Tiffany:
: Costco was using the Tiffany word to describe diamonds pronged/setted a certain way. Tiffany sued because their name was mentioned, thinking people may think that Costco's diamonds are theirs. However, it was founded that people these are sophisticated consumers, who will be able to understand that Tiffany is a diamond setting.
67
New cards
Marks can not be used in an:
unauthorized way
68
New cards
Manufacturing and trafficking counterfeit trademarked products is a:
criminal violation
69
New cards
Federal Trademark Dilution Act, 1995
Prohibits the usage of a mark same as or similar to another's trademark to dilute its significance, reputation, and goodwill
70
New cards
Blurring
When usage of a mark blurs distinctiveness of a famous mark
71
New cards
Tarnishment
When usage of a mark creates a negative impression about the famous company
72
New cards
Copyright Ownership
Copyright law grants property in certain creative expressions and prohibits others from reproducing it w/o permission
73
New cards
Criteria for copyright protection:
- Work must be original
74
New cards
- Must be fixed in a tangible medium of expression
75
New cards
- Must show creative expression
76
New cards
Individual copyright protection:
Author's life plus 70 years
77
New cards
Company copyright protection:
95 years from publication of 120 years from creation of the work, whichever expires first
78
New cards
Public Domain Day
January 1st of each year
79
New cards
As of Jan 1, 2024, works published in or before what year are public domain?
1928
80
New cards
Copyright Infringement protects:
The owner has to establish that defendant violates his or her exclusive rights of:
81
New cards
- Reproduction
82
New cards
- Creation of derivative works
83
New cards
- Distribution
84
New cards
- Performance
85
New cards
- Display
86
New cards
Copyright fair use includes copying for:
criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research
87
New cards
Andy Worhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith:
Copyright issue, Andy Warhol foundation lost because when they look at the elements, they cut right into the newspaper writer's profits
88
New cards
Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc., 593 U.S. ___ (2021).
rying to determine whether java apis counted under fair use in copyright law. The Supreme Court ruled, by a 6-2 decision, that Google had not violated Oracle's copyright by using components of Oracle's Java programming language in Google's Android operating system employed in most of its smartphones. SCOTUS sidestepped the issue of copyrights on Application Programming Interfaces and assumed fair use. Google loses
89
New cards
Factors for fair use are considered on:
A case-by-case basis
90
New cards
Closely Held Businesses:
Businesses owned and operated by a small amount of people (usually five or less) and there is a restriction on who can own shares. Typically family businesses
91
New cards
Publicly Held Business:
Stock is sold and owned by the public instead of investors
92
New cards
Basic Forms of Business Organizations:
sole proprietorships, partnerships, corporations
93
New cards
Sole proprietorships:
Least expensive business organization to create
94
New cards
- Proprietorship's continuity is tied directly to the will of the owner
95
New cards
- Sole proprietor is in total control of the business's goals and operations
96
New cards
- Only one owner and no formal documentation is required besides a business license
97
New cards
- Owner has unlimited liability for the obligations of the business organization
98
New cards
- Not taxed as an organization, the individual is taxed
99
New cards
Partnerships:
- Agreement between two or more persons to share a common interest in a commercial endeavour sharing profits and losses
100
New cards
- Easily formed compared to other business forms