1/5
p173
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Pahl - pooling of money
Doesn’t necessarily mean equality
Important to know who controls pooled money and equality of contributions (equal even if difference in incomes? Mme Scales comment)
Vogler et al - cohabitation and storing of money
Cohabiting couples less likely to pool money, perhaps wish to maintain independence
Cohabiting couples more likely than married couples to equally share domestic tasks
Nyman (2003) - meaning of money in relationships
Money has no fixed meaning and different couples define it in different ways, which can effect the nature of their relationship
Personal life perspective
Meanings that money has in a relationship cannot be taken for granted
E.g. one partner controlling the money in a relationship could be seen as unequal for some and equal for others
Personal life perspective - Smart (2007) - same-sex couples
Same-sex couples give a different meaning to control of money in a relationship
Gay men and lesbians attached no importance to who controlled money
Happy to leave this to their partners
Control of money not seen as indicator of equality
Greater freedom to do what suits them as a couple
SS couples don’t enter a relationship with preconceived notions about money (esp. as a source of power), allowing for more flexible financial arrangements
PLP - Weeks et al (2001) - alternative money management system
Typical pattern: pool household spending money, separate accounts for personal spending
Reflects value of co-independence - sharing but each partner maintains some independence by retaining control over some of their money
Similar to cohabiting couples trend (Vogler et al)