Exam 2 PSY450 Advanced Research Methods

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 7 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/163

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

164 Terms

1
New cards

Goals of the Experimental Research Strategy

To establish the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables.

2
New cards

Four Basic Elements of an Experimental Study

Manipulation, Measurement, Comparison, and Control

3
New cards

Manipulation

Researcher manipulates a variable by changing its value to create a set of two or more levels. The Independent Variable (IV).

4
New cards

Measurement

Results in a set of scores for each condition. The Dependent Variables (DV).

5
New cards

Comparison

Scores in one condition are compared with scores of another condition.

6
New cards

Control

All other variables are controlled to be sure that they do not influence the variables being examined.

7
New cards

Statistical Significance

The difference is large enough and consistent enough to rule out chance as plausible explanation.

8
New cards

Treatment Condition

The specific situation or environment a group of participants experience in the research study.

9
New cards

Levels

Different values of the IV. Selected to create and define the treatment conditions.

10
New cards

Extraneous Variables

All other variables in the study other than the IVs and DVs.

11
New cards

Directionality Problem

The existence of a relationship does not always explain the direction of the relationship.

12
New cards

Third-variable Problem

The existence of a relationship is not necessarily direct (i.e. causal). A third unidentified variable mat be responsible for producing the observed relationship.

13
New cards

2 Important Characteristics of Confounds

1.) An extraneous variable becomes a potential confound only if it may influence the DV.

2.) A variable that changes randomly, with no relation to the IV, is not a threat.

14
New cards

Techniques for controlling extraneous variables

1.) Holding variables constant

2.) Matching values across conditions

3.) Control by randomization

15
New cards

Outcome Research

Investigates the effectiveness of a treatment.

16
New cards

Process Research

Attempts to identify the active components of the treatment.

17
New cards

Within-subjects design

One "group" of subjects generates two "groups" of scores of comparison.

18
New cards

Simulation

Conditions in an experiment that closely duplicate the natural environment.

19
New cards

Mundane Realism

Superficial, usually physical characteristics, of the environment.

20
New cards

Experimental Realism

Psychological aspects of the simulation or the extent to which participants become immersed in the experiment and behave normally.

21
New cards

Field Study

Research conducted in a place that the participant perceives as a natural environment.

22
New cards

Between-subject Design

Each set of scores is obtained from diff groups of participants.

23
New cards

Between-Subject Design Advantages

Each individual score is independent from all other scores. Individual scores are not influenced by Practice or fatigue effects, and Contrast effects.

24
New cards

Contrast effects

The result from comparing one condition to another. The perception of a condition is influenced by its contrast to the previous condition

25
New cards

Between-Subjects Design Disadvantage

Require a relatively large number of participants. Each score is from a unique individual who has unique personal characteristics.

26
New cards

Assignment Bias

Only possible for between-subjects designs. Groups with different characteristics (that are not the variables of interest) threaten the internal validity of study.

27
New cards

Two major sources of confounds in between-subjects designs

Individual differences, and Environmental variables

28
New cards

To protect against assignment bias, researchers create equivalent groups and they must be:

Created equally, Treated equally, and Composed of equivalent individuals.

29
New cards

Three primary techniques to limiting Confounding by individual differences

Random assignment (Randomization), Matching groups (matched assignment), and Holding variables constant.

30
New cards

Strategies to minimize within group variance

Standardize procedures and treatment settings, Limit individual differences, and Greatly increase sample size.

31
New cards

Attrition

participant drop out

32
New cards

Diffusion

Treatment spreads to the control group

33
New cards

Compensatory Equalization

Subject demands treatment received by the other group

34
New cards

Compensatory Rivalry

Control group changes their normal behavior (e.g., works extra hard)

35
New cards

Resentful demoralization

Participants in control group become less productive and less motivated.

36
New cards

single-factor two-group design

Simplest version of between-subjects design. Researcher manipulates one IV with only two levels. Analyzed with an independent-measures t-test

37
New cards

Advantage and disadvantage of single-factor two-group design.

Advantage: simplicity, Disadvantage: Provides little information.

38
New cards

Single-factor multiple-group design

Analyzed with a single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) for independent measures. Provides stronger evidence for a cause-and-effect relationship than a two-group design.

39
New cards

A single factor ANOVA

Only indicates if you have significant main effect. If that factor only has two levels then you know there is a statistically significant difference between those two levels.

40
New cards

Threats to Internal Validity for Within-Subjects Design/Repeated-Measures Design

Environmental variables, and Time-related variables

41
New cards

Five time-related threats

1.) History

2.) Maturation

3.) Instrumentation

4.) Regression to the mean

5.) Order Effect

42
New cards

History

An event outside of the experiment that affects participants' scores in one condition differently from another condition.

43
New cards

Maturation

A systematic change in participants' physiology or psychology that occurs during the research study and affects participants' scores.

44
New cards

Instrumentation

Changes in the measuring instrument over time.

45
New cards

Regression to the mean

The tendency for extreme scores on a measurement to move towards the mean (regress) when the measurement is repeated.

46
New cards

Order Effect

Participating in one condition may have an effect on scores in the next condition.

47
New cards

Carry-over effects

When participants in a specific condition influences the following conditions

48
New cards

Dealing with Time-Related Threats, Shortening the time between conditions would:

Decreases the risk of time-related threats, Increases the likelihood of order effects.

49
New cards

Dealing with Time-Related Threats, Increasing the time between conditions would:

Decrease the likelihood of order effect, Increases the risk of time-related threats

50
New cards

Counterbalancing

Changing the order in which conditions are applied form one participant to another

51
New cards

Asymmetrical order effects

When different sequences have different order effects. e.g., A-B has a different effect than B-A.

52
New cards

Complete counterbalancing

Requires using every possible sequence. Easy with only two condition. Becomes more complex as the number of conditions increases.

53
New cards

Partial Counterbalancing

Does not use every possible sequence in conditions. e.g., (2!=1x2=2, 3!=1x2x3=6, 4!=1x2x3x4=24)

54
New cards

Advantages of with-subject design

Requires relatively few participants, Eliminates problems based on individual differences, Reduces variance.

55
New cards

Disadvantages of within-subjects design

Potential time-related factors, Participant attrition,

56
New cards

Three factors that differentiate within-subjects or between-subject designs

Individual differences, Time-related factors and order effects, Number of participants.

57
New cards

Matches-subjects Designs

Uses a separate group for each condition. Each individual in one group is matched one-to-one with an individual in every other group.

58
New cards

Advantages of multiple-group designs

Data are more likely to reveal the functional relationship between the two variables.

Produces a more convincing demonstration of a cause-and-effect relationship than a two-groups design.

59
New cards

Disadvantages of multiple-group designs

If too many treatments, distinction between treatments may be too small to see significant differences.

May increase attrition if more time is required of participants.

Counterbalancing is more difficult as number of treatments increases.

60
New cards

Factor

An independent variable (IV) in an experiment.

61
New cards

Factorial Design

A research design that includes two or more factors (IVs)

62
New cards

Factorial Matrix

the levels of one factor are listed in columns and the levels of the second factor are listed in rows.

63
New cards

Main Effect

Describes how one factor, independent of all other factors, affect behavior. A statistically significant mean difference among the levels of one factor, regardless of the other factor(s).

64
New cards

Interaction

Describes how combinations of factors jointly affect behavior. When one factor has a direct influence on the effect of a second factor.

65
New cards

How to Identifying Interactions

Graphing the results of a study As a rule of thumb, non-parallel lines indicate an interaction between the factors.

Compare the mean differences in any individual row with the mean differences in other rows. If the size and direction of the differences in one row are the same as the corresponding differences in other rows -> no interaction. If differences change from one row to another -> evidence of an interaction.

66
New cards

Mixed Factorial Design

Includes at least one IV that is between-subjects and at least one IV that is within-subjects.

67
New cards

What Statistical test do you use for a single factor design

Use a one-way ANOVA to evaluate the statistical significance of the mean difference.

68
New cards

What Statistical test do you use for a factorial design?

Use a factorial ANOVA. The type of factorial ANOVA depends on whether the factors are: Between-subjects, Within-subjects, Mixed designs.

69
New cards

How many subjects are needed for 2x2 independent groups (between-subjects) factorial?

5 unique subjects per cell x 4 cells = 20 subjects needed

<p>5 unique subjects per cell x 4 cells = 20 subjects needed</p>
70
New cards

How many subjects are needed for 2x2 independent repeated measures (within-subjects) factorial?

5 subjects/cell, same 5 in all 4 cells - 5 subjects needed

<p>5 subjects/cell, same 5 in all 4 cells - 5 subjects needed</p>
71
New cards

How many subjects are needed for 2x2 mixed factorial (one between and one within IV)?

5/cell, same 5 in two cells, different 5 in two other cells = 10 subjects needed. [ Columns = Within, Rows = Between ]

<p>5/cell, same 5 in two cells, different 5 in two other cells = 10 subjects needed. [ Columns = Within, Rows = Between ]</p>
72
New cards

Descriptive Statistics

Help organize, summarize, and simplify results. Turns a large pile of numbers into a smaller more manageable amount of numbers.

73
New cards

Inferential statistics

Help make generalizations from your sample to a broader population. Requires hypothesis testing. p-value is inferential statistics.

74
New cards

Statistic

A summary value that describes a sample. e.g., the average IQ score for a sample

75
New cards

Parameter

A summary value that describes a population. e.g., the average IQ scores for a population.

76
New cards

Central Tendency

A single score that defines the center of a distribution.

77
New cards

Mean

Mathematical average of a set of scores

78
New cards

Median

Score that divides a distribution in half

79
New cards

Mode

Most commonly occurring score

80
New cards

Range

The difference between the highest and lowest scores.

81
New cards

Standard Deviation (SD)

Square root of the variance. Describes the average distance from the mean.

82
New cards

Variance

The average squared distance from the mean

83
New cards

Line graphs

Preferred for continuous variables. Unlimited intermediate values exist. Ratio or interval data. An exception is when looking for interactions.

84
New cards

Bar graphs

Required for discrete variables. No intermediate values. Nominal or ordinal data.

85
New cards

Hypothesis Testing

A statistical procedure by distinguishing whether patters in the data representing systematic relationships among variables in the population or patterns in the data produced by random variation.

86
New cards

Null Hypothesis (H0)

There is no statistical difference between populations. e.g., M1=M2

87
New cards

Alternative hypothesis (H1)

here is a significant statistical difference between populations. e.g., M1 not qual to M2 OR M1 < M2 OR M1 > M2

88
New cards

Only two possible outcomes for Hypothesis testing.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, Reject null hypothesis (with some probability).

89
New cards

Alpha

the level of significance chosen by the researcher to evaluate the null hypothesis. Traditionally, alpha = 0.05 (or 5%) is the cut off for significance

90
New cards

Type I Error

Reject null hypothesis, but be wrong

91
New cards

a false report

A researcher finds evidence for a significant result when there is no relationship in the population

92
New cards

Type II Error

Fail to reject null hypothesis, but be wrong

93
New cards

2 Factors That Influence the Hypothesis Test

The number of scores in the sample, and The size of the variance.

94
New cards

How do studies using the experimental research strategy differ from other types of research?

a. Only experiments can demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship between variables.

b. Only experiments involve comparing two or more groups of scores.

c. Only experiments can demonstrate that relationships exist between variables and provide a description of the relationship.

d. Only experiments can demonstrate a bidirectional relationship between variables.

a. Only experiments can demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship between variables.

95
New cards

Dr. Jones is interested in studying how indoor lighting can influence people’s moods during the winter. A sample of 100 households is selected. Fifty of the homes are randomly assigned to the bright-light condition where Dr. Jones replaces all the lights with 100-watt bulbs. In the other 50 houses, all the lights are changed to 60-watt bulbs. After two months, Dr. Jones measures the level of depression for the people living in the houses. In this example, how many dependent variables are there?

a. 100

b. 50

c. 2

d. 1

d. 1

96
New cards

Research indicates the people who suffer from depression also tend to experience insomnia. However, it is unclear whether the depression causes insomnia or the lack of sleep causes depression. What problem is demonstrated by this example?

a. the directionality problem

b. the third-variable problem

c. the extraneous variable problem

d. the manipulation-check problem

a. the directionality problem

97
New cards

In an experiment, what is the purpose for manipulating the independent variable?

a. It helps establish the direction of the relationship by showing that the dependent variable changes when you manipulate the independent variable.

b. It helps eliminate the third-variable problem because you decide when to manipulate rather than waiting for the variable to change.

c. It helps establish the direction of the relationship and it helps eliminate the third-variable problem.

d. Manipulation does not establish the direction of the relationship or eliminate the third-vari able problem.

c. It helps establish the direction of the relationship and it helps eliminate the third-variable problem.

98
New cards

In order to establish an unambiguous relationship between two variables, it is necessary to eliminate the possible influence of which of the following variables?

a. Extraneous variables

b. Confounding variables

c. Independent variables

d. Dependent variables

b. Confounding variables

99
New cards

Which of the following characteristics are necessary for an extraneous variable to become a confounding variable?

a. It must change systematically from one participant to the next.

b. It must change systematically when the independent variable is changed.

c. It must have no systematic relationship with the dependent variable.

d. It must have no systematic relationship to either the independent or the dependent variables.

b. It must change systematically when the independent variable is changed.

100
New cards

In an experiment comparing two treatments, the researcher assigns participants to treatment conditions so that each condition has fifteen 7-year-old children and ten 8-year-old children. For this study, what method is being used to control participant age?

a. Randomization

b. Matching

c. Holding constant

d. Limiting the range

b. Matching