**behaviourist**
* The behaviourist approach is concerned with behaviour which can be observed and measured.
* it investigates mental processes of the mind
* it rejects introspection as it involves too many concepts that were vague and difficult to measure
* therefore behaviourists tried to maintain more control and objectivity within their research and relied on lab experiments as the best way to do this
* it includes classical and operant conditioning as forms of learning a behaviour
* classical conditioning is learning through association and operant conditioning is learning through reinforcement
**biological**
* the biological approach says that everything psychological is first biological, so to fully understand behaviour we must look to biological structures and processes in the body such as genes, neurochemistry, brain structure, genotype and phenotype, evolution and the nervous system
\
**Comparison:**
\
A similarity between these approaches is that they are both deterministic. For example, both approaches argue that behaviour is, to some extent, determined. Behaviourists argue that behaviour is determined by the environment and is a product of stimulus-response associations, while biological psychologists argue that behaviour is the product of internal biological factors (e.g. genes, hormones, neurotransmitters, etc.). As a result, it is clear that both approaches argue that behaviour is determined, although they differ in their belief about the origins of behaviour.
\
Furthermore, both approaches take a nomothetic approach when studying human behaviour. Both behaviourists and biological psychologists investigate behaviour in an attempt to create universal laws that apply to all human beings. Behaviourists argue that this is possible because human beings share similar physiologies, and behaviourists argue that this is possible because all behaviour is the result of learning and stimulus-response associations. Therefore, the aim of generating universal laws that apply to all humans is another similarity between the behaviourist and biological approaches.
\
However, the behaviourist approach and biological approach are different in their position on the nature-nurture debate. Behaviourist views rest firmly on the nurture side of the debate, and they argue that human beings are born a blank slate and that all behaviour is learned. Biological psychologists, on the other hand, would argue a nature-based view of behaviour. They posit that behaviour is the result of innate biological factors (e.g. genes, hormones, neurotransmitters. etc.) and is, therefore, the product of nature and not nurture. Therefore, despite their similarities in terms of determinism and their approach to investigation, the behaviourist and biological approaches are radically different in terms of their position on the nature-nurture debate.