1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Equitable Estoppel
An equitable doctrine that prevents a party from abandoning an assumption or expectation that they created or encouraged, especially when the other party relied on it to their detriment.
Main Idea of Equity Estoppel
It aims to avoid unconscionable conduct and detriment, not just enforce promises.
AERKDF
Mnemonic for the six elements of equitable estoppel: Assumption, Encouragement, Reliance, Knowledge, Detriment, Failure to avoid detriment.
Assumption / Expectation
What did the plaintiff believe would happen?
Encouraged / Induced
Did the defendant create or encourage that belief?
Reliance
Did the plaintiff act based on that belief?
Knowledge / Intention
Did the defendant know or intend for the plaintiff to rely on this assumption?
Detriment
Will the plaintiff suffer a disadvantage if the defendant abandons that assumption?
Failure to Avoid Detriment
Did the defendant fail to mitigate the disadvantage?
Waltons Stores v Maher (1988)
A crucial case illustrating equitable estoppel, where Maher acted to his detriment based on an assumption encouraged by Waltons Stores.
Significance of Waltons Stores v Maher
Equitable estoppel can provide relief even without an enforceable contract.
High Trees Case
A foundational case for promissory estoppel that shows parties may be prevented from insisting on strict legal rights because of reliance on representations.
Common Law vs Equitable Estoppel
Common law focuses on enforcing contractual promises, while equitable estoppel addresses unconscionable conduct and detrimental reliance.
Key Cases for Elements of Equitable Estoppel
E: Skywest; R: Sidhu; K: Crown Melbourne; D: Thompson/Quaglia/Hawker.
Remedy in Equitable Estoppel
Equitable relief should address the detriment suffered, not automatically enforce the original promise.
Structure for Problem Question