Qualitative Validity and Its Parallels to Quantitative Validity

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
linked notesView linked note
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

These flashcards cover key concepts related to qualitative validity and its comparison with quantitative validity, including definitions of the four types of qualitative validity and various tools used in qualitative research.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

Validity

Refers to how accurately a study represents reality.

2
New cards

Qualitative Validity

Ensures that the study's findings are credible and reflective of participants' real experiences.

3
New cards

Credibility

The confidence in the truthfulness and accuracy of the data and interpretations in qualitative research.

4
New cards

Transferability

The extent to which qualitative findings can be applied to other settings, groups, or contexts.

5
New cards

Dependability

The stability and consistency of the research findings over time.

6
New cards

Confirmability

The extent to which a study's findings are shaped by the data, rather than the researcher's bias.

7
New cards

Trustworthiness

The overall integrity and reliability of qualitative research findings.

8
New cards

Triangulation

Using multiple sources or methods to cross-check findings and reduce bias.

9
New cards

Member Checking

A technique that allows participants to review preliminary findings to confirm their accuracy.

10
New cards

Thick Description

Providing rich, detailed contextual information to assess the applicability of the study's findings.

11
New cards

Audit Trail

Keeping detailed records of research decisions and processes for transparency.

12
New cards

Reflexivity

Acknowledging and reflecting on the researcher's biases and experiences that may influence the study.

13
New cards

Prolonged Engagement

Spending sufficient time in the research setting to build trust and gain deeper insights.

14
New cards

Peer Debriefing

Sharing findings with colleagues or external experts for critical feedback.

15
New cards

Negative Case Analysis

Actively searching for data that contradicts emerging themes to refine interpretations.