PSYC207 exam 3

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/63

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:30 PM on 5/1/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

64 Terms

1
New cards
Social norm
widely held beliefs about what most people in a group believe or value
2
New cards
Experiment
a study in which at least one variable is manipulated and another is measured
3
New cards
Manipulated variable
a variable in an experiment that a researcher controls, such as by assigning participants to its different levels (values)
4
New cards
Measured variable
a variable in a study whose levels (values) are observed and recorded
5
New cards
Independent variable
in an experiment, a variable that is manipulated; in a multiple-regression analysis, a predictor variable used to explain variance in the criterion variable
6
New cards
Condition
one of the levels of the independent variable in an experiment
7
New cards
Dependent variable
in an experiment, the variable that is measured. In a multiple-regression analysis, the single outcome, or criterion variable the researchers are most interested in understanding or predicting. Also called outcome variable
8
New cards

Control variable

in an experiment, any variable that an experimenter holds constant on purpose

  • Not really variables at all; they do not vary

  • Levels kept the same for all participants

  • Eliminate alternative explanations → internal validity

9
New cards

Comparison group

a group in an experiment whose levels on the independent variable differ from those of the treatment group in some intended and meaningful way. Doesn’t need to be a control group

10
New cards

Control group / control condition

a level of an independent variable that is intended to represent “no treatment” or a neutral condition

11
New cards
Treatment group
the participants in an experiment who are exposed to the level of the independent variable that involves a medication, therapy, or intervention
12
New cards
Placebo group
a control group in an experiment that is exposed to an inert treatment, eg. a sugar pill
13
New cards
Confound
a general term for a potential alternative explanation for a research finding; a threat to internal validity
14
New cards
Design confound
a threat to internal validity in an experiment in which a second variable happens to vary systematically along with the independent variables and therefore is an alternative explanation for the results
15
New cards
Systematic variability
in an experiment, a description of when the levels of a variable coincide in some predictable way with experimental group membership, creating a potential confound
16
New cards
Unsystematic variability
in an experiment, a description of when the levels of a variable fluctuate independently of experimental group membership, contributing to variability within groups
17
New cards
Selection effect
a threat to internal validity that occurs in an independent-groups design when the kinds of participants at one level of the independent variable are systematically different from those at the other level
18
New cards
Matched groups
an experimental design technique in which participants who are similar on some measured variable are grouped into sets; the members of each matched set are then randomly assigned to different experimental conditions
19
New cards

Independent-groups design

an experimental design in which different groups of participants are exposed to different levels of the independent variable, such that each participant experiences only one level of the independent variable

20
New cards
Within-groups design
an experimental design in which each participant is presented with all levels of the independent variable
21
New cards
Posttest-only design
an experiment using an independent-groups design in which participants are tested on the dependent variable only once
22
New cards
Pretest/posttest design
an experiment using an independent-groups design in which participants are tested on the key dependent variable twice
23
New cards
Repeated-measures design
an experiment using a within-groups design in which participants respond to a dependent variable more than once, after exposure to each level of the independent variable
24
New cards
Concurrent-measures design
an experiment using a within-groups design in which participants are exposed to all the levels of an independent variable at roughly the same time, and a single attitudinal or behavioral preference is the dependent variable
25
New cards
Order effect
in a within-groups design, a threat to internal validity in which exposure to one condition changes participant responses to a later condition
26
New cards

Practice effect (fatigue effect)

a type of order effect in which participants’ performance improves over time because they become practiced at the dependent measure (not because of the manipulation or treatment)

27
New cards
Carryover effect
a type of order effect in which some form of contamination carries over from one condition to the next
28
New cards
Counterbalancing
in a repeated-measures experiment, presenting the levels of the independent variable to participants in different sequences to control for order effects
29
New cards
Full counterbalancing
a method of counterbalancing in which all possible condition orders are represented
30
New cards
Partial counterbalancing
a method of counterbalancing in which some, but not all, of the possible condition orders are represented
31
New cards
Latin square
a formal system of partial counterbalancing to ensure that every condition in a within-groups design appears in each position at least once
32
New cards
Manipulation check
in an experiment, an extra dependent variable researchers can include to determine how well a manipulation worked
33
New cards
Pilot study
a study completed before (or sometimes after) the study of primary interest, usually to test the effectiveness or characteristics of the manipulations
34
New cards
One-group, pretest/posttest design
an experiment in which a researcher recruits one group of participants; measures them on a pretest; exposes them to a treatment, intervention, or change; and then measures them on a posttest
35
New cards
Maturation threat
a threat to internal validity that occurs when an observed change in an experimental group could have emerged more or less spontaneously over time
36
New cards
History threat
a threat to internal validity that occurs when it is unclear whether a change in the treatment group is caused by the treatment itself or by an external or historical factor that affects most members of the group
37
New cards
Regression threat
a threat to internal validity related to regression to the mean, a phenomenon in which any extreme finding is likely to be closer to its own typical, or mean, level the next time it is measured (with or without the experimental treatment or intervention)
38
New cards
Regression to the mean
a phenomenon in which an extreme finding is likely to be closer to its own typical, or mean, level the next time it is measured, because the same combination of chance factors that made the finding extreme are not present the second time
39
New cards
Attrition threat
in a pretest/posttest, repeated-measures, or quasi-experimental study, a threat to internal validity that occurs when a systematic type of participant drops out of the study before it ends
40
New cards

Testing threat

in a repeated-measures experiment or quasi-experiment, a kind of order effect in which scores change over time just because participants have taken the test more than once; includes practice effects

41
New cards
Instrumentation threat
a threat to internal validity that occurs when a measuring instrument changes over time
42
New cards
Selection-history threat
a threat to internal validity in which a historical or seasonal event systematically affects only the participants in the treatment group or only those in the comparison group, not both
43
New cards
Selection-attrition threat
a threat to internal validity in which participants are likely to drop out of either the treatment group or the comparison group, not both
44
New cards
Observer bias
a bias that occurs when observer expectations influence the interpretation of participant behaviors or the outcome of the study
45
New cards
Demand characteristics
a cue that leads participants to guess a study’s hypotheses or goals; a threat to internal validity
46
New cards
Double-blind study
a study in which neither the participants nor the researchers who evaluate them know who is in the treatment group and who isi in the comparison group
47
New cards
Masked design
a study design in which the observers are unaware of the experimental conditions to which participants have been assigned
48
New cards
Placebo effect
a response or effect that occurs when people receiving an experimental treatment experience a change only because they believe they are receiving a valid treatment
49
New cards
Double-blind placebo control study
a study that uses a treatment group and a placebo group and in which neither the researchers nor the participants know who is in which group
50
New cards

Null effect

a finding that an independent variable did not make a difference in the dependent variable; there is no significant covariance between the two

51
New cards
Ceiling effect
an experimental design problem in which independent variable groups score almost the same on a dependent variable, such that all scores fall at the high end of their possible distribution
52
New cards
Floor effect
an experimental design problem in which independent variable groups score almost the same on a dependent variable, such that all scores fall at the low end of their possible distribution
53
New cards
Noise
unsystematic variability among the members of a group in an experiment, which might be caused by situation noise, individual differences, or measurement error (aka error variance, unsystematic variance)
54
New cards

Measurement error

the degree to which the recorded measure for a participant on some variable differs from the true value of the variable for that participant. May be random, such that scores that are too high and too low cancel each other out; or they may be systematic, such that most scores are biased either too high or too low

55
New cards
Situation noise
unrelated events or distractions in the external environment that create unsystematic variability within groups in an experiment
56
New cards
Power
the likelihood that a study will show a statistically significant result when an independent variable truly has an effect in the population
57
New cards
Interaction effect
a result from a factorial design, in which the difference in the levels of one independent variable changes, depending on the level of the other independent variable; a difference in differences
58
New cards
Factorial design
a study in which there are 2 or more independent variables, or factors
59
New cards

Cell

a condition in an experiment; in a simple experiment, it can represent the level of one independent variable; in a factorial design, it represents one of the possible combinations of two independent variables

60
New cards
Participant variable
a variable such as age, gender, or ethnicity whose levels are selected (ie, measured), not manipulated
61
New cards
Main effect
in a factorial design, the overall effect of one independent variable on the dependent variable, averaging over the levels of the other independent variable
62
New cards
Marginal means
in a factorial design, the arithmetic means for each level of an independent variable, averaging over the levels of another independent variable
63
New cards

Causal claims

  • Making a claim about treatment, etc.

  • Can only be tested with experiments

  • Three rules:

    • (1) Covariance

    • (2) Temporal Precedence

    • (3) Internal Validity (ruling out alternative explanations)

64
New cards

Temporal precedence

can be established by an experiment, but not a correlational study; establishes that the independent variable came before the dependent variable; a component of causality