Ethical Issues in Psychological Research and Codes of Ethics

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
full-widthPodcast
1
Card Sorting

1/99

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A set of 100 vocabulary flashcards covering key terms, historical trials, basic principles, and legal frameworks in research ethics based on the PSRS 412 lecture notes.

Last updated 10:45 AM on 9/14/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

100 Terms

1
New cards

Reactive Ethical Guidelines

Ethical guidelines that were developed reactively as 'recipes' to resolve research situations or outcomes that had caused harm to participants, rather than proactively.

2
New cards

John Bryant

Past President of CIOMS (2000) who stated that it took the cruelty described at Nuremberg to make the world realize it had to protect human subjects from inhuman research.

3
New cards

Robert Levine

Author who noted in 2013 during discussions on the Declaration of Helsinki that nothing moves the field of research ethics forward faster than a scandal.

4
New cards

Research (WHO-ERC Definition)

Any social science, biomedical, behavioral, or epidemiological activity that entails systematic collection or analysis of data, with the intent to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.

5
New cards

Generalizable Knowledge

Theories, principles, or relationships, or the accumulation of information on which they are based, that can be corroborated by accepted scientific methods of observation and inference.

6
New cards

Research for Health

The development of knowledge with the aim of understanding health challenges and mounting an improved response to them, spanning five generic areas of activity.

7
New cards

Five Generic Areas of Activity in Research for Health

Measuring the problem, understanding its cause(s), elaborating solutions, translating solutions into policy/practice/products, and evaluating effectiveness.

8
New cards

Research Ethics (WHO Definition)

The requirement that all research involving human participants respects the dignity, safety, and rights of research participants and recognizes the responsibilities of researchers.

9
New cards

Absolutism

The stance that exception-less ethical rules exist that are valid for all cultures at all times and places.

10
New cards

Universalism

The view that fundamental ethical principles exist that are universally applicable because ethical principles are general and require moral interpretation.

11
New cards

Sigmund Rascher

SS doctor who oversaw human experimentation involving icy water immersion of Nazi victims at Dachau concentration camp in 1942.

12
New cards

Dachau Concentration Camp Experiment (1942)

German-supported Nazi experiment in 1942 where victims were immersed in icy water, overseen by SS doctor Sigmund Rascher.

13
New cards

Unit 731

Japanese military research unit in China during WWII that tortured and killed over 3,000 Chinese people through vivisections, intentional infections, and testing limits of human tolerance.

14
New cards

Doctors' Trial (1946-1947)

The Nuremberg trial prosecuting doctors and medical personnel involved in war crimes and human experimentation during WWII.

15
New cards

Nuremberg Code (1947)

A 10-point ethics code crafted by Dr. Leo Alexander defining legitimate human research within a legal framework following WWII.

16
New cards

Dr. Leo Alexander

The individual who crafted the Nuremberg Code in 1947 as a legal framework for legitimate human research.

17
New cards

UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

Landmark declaration adopted in 1948 following WWII establishing fundamental human rights standards globally.

18
New cards

Voluntary Consent (Nuremberg Code Point 1)

The foundational principle of the Nuremberg Code stating that the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

19
New cards

Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972)

US Public Health Service study in Alabama that deceived 600 Black men and deliberately withheld penicillin to track syphilis progression over decades.

20
New cards

Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study (1963)

Study in Brooklyn, NY where researchers secretly injected live cancer cells into 22 elderly, debilitated patients to study immune rejection.

21
New cards

Willowbrook State School Study (1967)

Study in New York where institutionalized children with intellectual disabilities were deliberately infected with live hepatitis virus to study transmission.

22
New cards

Declaration of Helsinki (1964)

World Medical Association code addressing Nuremberg Code deficiencies, specifically concerning research in legally incompetent or vulnerable populations.

23
New cards

Beneficence (Declaration of Helsinki)

The ethical duty of a physician defined as 'do positive good'.

24
New cards

Non-malfeasance (Declaration of Helsinki)

The ethical duty of a physician defined as 'do no harm'.

25
New cards

Belmont Report (1979)

Report framing boundaries between practice and research across three basic ethical principles: autonomy (respect for persons), beneficence, and justice.

26
New cards

Respect for Persons (Belmont Principle)

Ethical principle requiring that individuals be treated as autonomous agents and that those with diminished autonomy be entitled to protection.

27
New cards

Beneficence (Belmont Principle)

Ethical obligation placed upon investigators, stakeholders, and society to do positive good, maximize possible benefits, and minimize possible harms.

28
New cards

Justice (Belmont Principle)

Ethical requirement centered on fairness and rights, ensuring equal distribution of research burdens and benefits.

29
New cards

Distributive Justice

Principle ensuring an individual receives research benefits without being denied entitlement and bears burdens without having them imposed unduly.

30
New cards

Non-pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment Study

An emergency medicine research study cited as an example involving non-consenting participants due to emergency conditions.

31
New cards

Prescriptive Ticked Sheet

A checklist format used by ethics committees specifying essential disclosures required in an informed consent form.

32
New cards

Informed Decision-Making Process

Comprehensive process encompassing all aspects leading to informed consent and informed dissent, distinct from mere signed documentation.

33
New cards

Competence (Informed Decision-Making)

The participant's ability and capacity to understand research information provided by investigators.

34
New cards

Voluntariness (Informed Decision-Making)

A participant's decision to join a study free of coercion, undue influence, intimidation, or improper inducement.

35
New cards

Comprehensive Information

The investigator's responsibility to provide complete research details without omitting necessary facts.

36
New cards

Comprehensible Information

Information presented by the investigator using simple, clear language tailored to the participant's understanding.

37
New cards

Social Harm

Risks to participants arising from research involvement, including stigmatization and community exclusion.

38
New cards

Legal Harm

Risks to participants arising from research involvement, including fines or potential incarceration.

39
New cards

SRH Research

Sexual and Reproductive Health research, which involves deeply personal topics, unique vulnerabilities, and potentially disturbing disclosures.

40
New cards

Commercial Sex Workers Research Dilemma

Ethical situation where participants viewed the researcher as naive and judgmental, while the researcher felt voyeuristic, exploitive, emotional, and vulnerable.

41
New cards

Statutory Duty of Researchers

The legal obligation of researchers to inform authorities when sensitive information regarding collateral illegal activities or drug use is obtained.

42
New cards

Court Order to Compel Disclosure

A judicial command requiring researchers to disclose confidential participant data gathered during research.

43
New cards

Harm from Stigmatization

Group harm resulting from research that creates negative stereotypes or public bias against specific participant populations.

44
New cards

Double Stigmatization

Compounded harm occurring when research associates sensitive issues (e.g., domestic violence, HIV/AIDS) with specific spouses, schools, or subgroups.

45
New cards

Cultural Sensitivity

The obligation of researchers and sponsors to respect the variety of beliefs, customs, and practices across different cultures.

46
New cards

Moral Relativism

Concept analyzing whether ethical standards are culturally dependent rather than universally fixed.

47
New cards

Community Permission

Authorization obtained from a community leader, tribal chief, or council of elders to enter premises; distinct from individual consent to enroll participants.

48
New cards

Community Consent (Misnomer)

The mistaken label given to leader permission; it does not grant consent to enroll individual participants.

49
New cards

Mystery Clients

Undercover evaluators used in social science research whose hidden identity violates standard informed consent rules due to deception.

50
New cards

Covert Research

Research conducted without participant knowledge, allowable only when reviewed, approved, and justified by compelling importance, safety, participant benefits, or avoiding social desirability bias.

51
New cards

Social Desirability Bias

The tendency of participants to modify their behavior or answers to appear favorable, used as a justification for covert research.

52
New cards

Substantive Ethical Requirements

Universal bioethical principles (respect for persons, beneficence, justice) that must be applied consistently across all study sites.

53
New cards

Procedural Ethical Requirements

Operational rules (such as written signatures, review committee composition) that vary according to cultural and institutional differences.

54
New cards

Plagiarism

Copying contents or data of a previous study and presenting it as one's own, even with occasional citation.

55
New cards

Falsification

Altering or changing the actual results or data of research.

56
New cards

Fabrication

Creating or inventing fake research data entirely.

57
New cards

Autonomy + Veracity

The ethical relationship combination that forms the foundation of Informed Consent.

58
New cards

Beneficence + Non-Maleficence

The ethical relationship combination that forms the foundation of Risk Benefit assessment.

59
New cards

Confidentiality + Justice

The ethical relationship combination that forms the foundation of Participant Rights.

60
New cards

PAP Code of Ethics

The ethical code established by the Psychological Association of the Philippines to provide a framework for responsible practice.

61
New cards

Universal Declaration of Ethical Principles for Psychologists

Global framework emphasizing dignity, competent caring, integrity, and social responsibility that serves as the foundation for psychological ethics codes.

62
New cards

Principle I (PAP Code)

Respect for the Dignity of Persons and Peoples; recognized as the most fundamental and universally found ethical principle.

63
New cards

Principle II (PAP Code)

Competent Caring for the Well-Being of Persons and Peoples; working for benefit, doing no harm, and maximizing potential benefits.

64
New cards

Principle III (PAP Code)

Integrity; maintaining honesty, truthfulness, open and accurate communication, and managing biases and conflicts of interest.

65
New cards

Principle IV (PAP Code)

Professional and Scientific Responsibilities to Society; contributing to knowledge about human behavior to improve individual and social conditions.

66
New cards

IUPsyS

International Union of Psychological Science, co-creator of the Universal Declaration of Ethical Principles for Psychologists.

67
New cards

IAAP

International Association of Applied Psychology, co-creator of the Universal Declaration of Ethical Principles for Psychologists.

68
New cards

APA Code of Ethics

Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct published by the APA, first established in 1953 and revised 11 times.

69
New cards

Five Aspirational Principles (APA)

Beneficence & Nonmaleficence, Fidelity & Responsibility, Integrity, Justice, and Respect for People's Rights & Dignity.

70
New cards

Standard 8 (APA Code)

The specific section of the APA Ethics Code directly governing Research and Publication.

71
New cards

APA Standard 8.01

Institutional Approval; requires providing accurate proposal information and securing formal approval before conducting research.

72
New cards

APA Standard 8.02

Informed Consent to Research; mandates disclosing purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, confidentiality, incentives, and withdrawal rights.

73
New cards

APA Standard 8.07 & 8.08

Deception & Debriefing standards requiring deception to be justified, non-deceptive options unavailable, and debriefing provided promptly.

74
New cards

APA Standard 8.09

Humane Care & Use of Animals; mandates justifying animal use, using trained handling, and minimizing pain, stress, and privation.

75
New cards

APA Standard 8.10

Reporting Results; explicitly forbids data fabrication and requires prompt correction of errors via retraction, erratum, or correction.

76
New cards

APA Standard 8.11

Plagiarism; prohibits presenting portions of another's work or data as one's own, even with occasional citation.

77
New cards

APA Standard 8.12

Publication Credit; mandates that authorship reflect actual contribution, where institutional rank alone does not justify credit.

78
New cards

APA Standard 8.13 & 8.14

Duplicate Publication & Data Sharing; forbids republishing data as original and mandates sharing data for verification under reasonable conditions.

79
New cards

APA Standard 8.15 & 8.16

Reviewer Duties & Employer Rights; mandates respecting confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and handling institutional data appropriately.

80
New cards

RA 10029

The Philippine Psychology Act of 2009, making licensure mandatory so that only registered psychologists/psychometricians may legally practice.

81
New cards

July 24, 2009

The date when the revised Code of Ethics for Philippine Psychologists was ratified by the PAP Board of Directors.

82
New cards

PAP Section X.A

Rights & Dignity of Participants section emphasizing cultural sensitivity, non-verbal withdrawal cues, screening for harm, and international humanitarian law.

83
New cards

Assent

Informed agreement obtained from minors under 18 alongside formal informed consent from a parent or legal guardian.

84
New cards

Detained Persons (Consent Protection)

Special safeguards required to ensure prisoners or detainees can freely grant consent without institutional pressure.

85
New cards

Re-consent

The PAP requirement to re-obtain informed consent at multiple points across a longitudinal study timeline.

86
New cards

Debriefing (PAP Section X.H)

Process of explaining study contributions, correcting misconceptions, reestablishing trust, and honoring requests to destroy recordings/data.

87
New cards

Legal Anchoring Comparison

Contrast between APA (anchored in APA membership and state licensing boards) and PAP (anchored in Philippine law RA 10029).

88
New cards

Cultural Framing Comparison

Contrast between APA (focusing on individual rights) and PAP (incorporating community mores, customs, and peoples).

89
New cards

Data Privacy Act of 2012 (RA 10173)

Philippine law regulating personal data processing in full effect since September 2017, impacting research consent and data security.

90
New cards

National Privacy Commission (NPC)

Philippine regulatory body enforcing RA 10173 and providing advisory guidance regarding research exemptions and data subject rights.

91
New cards

Section 5(c) of the DPA

Provision establishing that the research exemption in RA 10173 is not a blanket pass and still requires compliance with ethical standards.

92
New cards

NEGHHR

National Ethical Guidelines for Health and Health-related Research in the Philippines.

93
New cards

Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act (RA 8371)

Philippine law protecting indigenous rights and mandating Free, Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) before research is conducted.

94
New cards

NCIP

National Commission on Indigenous Peoples, the agency regulating customary-law research and FPIC enforcement.

95
New cards

Free, Prior Informed Consent (FPIC)

Mandatory legal consent required under RA 8371 prior to collecting data or genetic samples from indigenous communities.

96
New cards

PHREB

Philippine Health Research Ethics Board, responsible for accrediting research ethics committees across the Philippines.

97
New cards

PHREB-NCIP Memorandum of Understanding (2016)

2016 agreement requiring researchers working with indigenous communities to secure both NCIP FPIC and accredited ethics committee clearance.

98
New cards

Moral Disengagement (AI Research)

Psychological mechanism where normalized misuse of generative AI tools leads students to rationalize academic dishonesty.

99
New cards

Right to Erasure

Data subject right under RA 10173 enabling participants to demand data deletion, complicating long-term research archiving.

100
New cards

Digital Informed Consent (E-Consent)

Process of obtaining consent online that must adhere to standard understandable language principles across language and literacy barriers.