- 1. misunderstands the nature of development (thinks all behaviour is subject to genes)
SSSM sets a false dichotomy- it is not nature vs nurture, rather nature-nurture interactive and go hand in hand; ex/ melanin or facultative traits
Learning is not governed by general laws; learning and cognition are modular aka not all types of cognition are the same
SSSM divides natural and social sciences; SSSM separates themselves from the life sciences but behaviourists do not do this
SSSM does not explain a design = can explain a certain phenomena, but cannot explain WHY they are that way
can have proximate explanations but not ultimate ones
proximate level:
how does it develop (ontogeny)?
What are the causal mechanisms (physiological)?
ultimate level: 3. how did it evolve (phylogeny)? 4. what is the adaptive function?
- -sexually dymorphant: there are differences between males and females/ sex difference in body size
primarily plant gatherers, some hunting
strong dominance ranks males are dominant over females);
in a group of chimps, you will have a dominant males
pan lineage:
brain did not enlarge
facultative bipedalism
quadrupedalism
larger teeth
- -5-2MYA; there were robus and lighter forms
full bipedalism preceded large brains
not sure if they lived in a forest or savannah