1/54
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
indictable offences
serious criminal offences
e.g. murder, culpable driving causing death
indictable offences courts
County and Supreme Court (TD)
committal hearings
pre-trial step in a serious criminal case where a magistrate decides if there is enough evidence for the case to proceed to a higher court for trial
summary offences
minor criminal offences
e.g. minor assault, theft
summary offences courts
Magistrates’ Court
indictable offences hear summarily
when indictable offences are treated as summary offences
conditions for indictable offences heard summarily
less than 1200 penalty units and under 10 yrs imprisonment
offender accused
why indictable offences heard summarily
quicker, cheaper
receive a lesser punishment
presumption of innocence
the guarantee by a state to its citizens that they will be treated as being innocent until the charge has been proven beyond reasonable doubt
burden of proof
the responsibility of a party to prove a case
burden of proof - party
prosecution
standard of proof
the degree or extent that a case must be proven
standard of proof - criminal
beyond a reasonable doubt
presumption of innocence - burden of proof
by not having people prove their innocence but having the person who initiated the case prove their guilt
standard of proof aim
protects against wrongful convictions by preventing innocent people from being convicted and sanctioned
the right to trial without unreasonable delay
ensures that an accused person has their case heard in a timely manner
the right to trial without unreasonable delay
Human Rights Charter
reasonable reason for delays
give prosecution and defence time to make a case
availablity of legal system - lawyers, judge, court
people being unable to attend court for some reason
the trial without unreasonable delay purpose
causes unecessary stress and anxiety
increases cost
may impact the accuracy of evidence given
right to silence
allows a person to remain silent when questioned
right to silence - protection
statute and common law
right to silence - purpose
protects presumption of innocence - not requiring people to prove their innocence
words can be misconstrued and/or twisted
coercion may occur during questioning
the right to trial by jury
anyone charged with an indictable offence is entitled to and must have a jury, made up of their peers, present at their trial
Right to trial by jury - protection
commonwealth - section 80 of Constitution
victorian - Criminal Procudure Act 2009, Juries Act 2000
right to trial by jury - purpose
ensures that evidence is believed by a wide range of people
decision is shared
decision reflects community values
right to give evidence through alternative arrangement
allows victims to give evidence in a way that is not traditional
right to give evidence through alternative arrangement protection
Criminal Procedure Act 2009
Victims who excersise the right to give evidence through alternative arrangement
family violence
sexual assault
threatening, obscene behaviour
right to give evidence through alternative arrangement purposes
reduces secondary trauma
ensures that evidence is true and accurate
right to be informed about the proceedings
how the police must inform all victims about court proceedings, charges, the accused’s pleas, trial details
right to be informed about the proceedings purposes
get first priority
gives them the choice to attend
right to be informed of the likely release date of the accused
how victims can be informed at least 14 days before the release date of the accused
right to be informed of the likely release date of the accused - avenue
Victims Register
right to be informed of the likely release date of the accused purpose
can submit a statement disagreeing with choice
prevents any re-hatching of violent behaviour or “revenge“
allows them to prepare
fairness
all people can participate in the criminal justice system and its processes should be impartial and open
features of fairness
impartial processes
open processes
participation
impartial processes
all people involved in the legal system
independant
unbiased
make decisions based on evidence and facts
open processes
allows the public to view and scrutinised all processes and cases
equality
all people engaging in the justice system and its processes should be treated in the same way, however if the same treatment causes disparity or disadvantage, adequate measures should be implemented to allow all to engage with the legal system without disparity or disadvantage
types of equality
formal
substantive
formal equality
treating all people the same
substantive equality
is making adjustments to remove any disparities or disadvantages a party may face
access
all peopel should be able to engage with the justice system on an informed bias
features of access
engagement
informed basis
engagement
people should be able to directly engage with the legal system
any barriers doing this should be removed
Victorian Legal Aid
a government funded agency that ensures equal legal access to the legal system
ways that VLA aids victims and accuseds
free legal information
free legal advice
ongoing legal representation
duty lawyers
grant of legal assistance
the way that people get money through legal aid to afford ongoing legal representation
duty lawyers
lawyers that are available on the day for any cases that may need them
eligibility requirements to receive a grant of legal assistance
what they case is about
the likely benefit to the perosn and the community
financial information and circumstances of the person
general CLCs
provide broad legal services to people within a geographical area
e.g. Fitzroy Legal Centre
specfic CLCs
provide legal servcies to a particular group or for a particular area of law
e.g. YouthLaw
CLC aids
provide people with free
legal services
advice
information
ways CLCs aid victims
provide victims with suport and help to get into VOCAT
ways CLCs aid witnesses
support them when they need to testify in trials