meta ethics

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/23

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

24 Terms

1
New cards

what is meta ethics concerning

what good means

2
New cards

cognitive language

objectively true or false, can be falsified or verified using logic or evidence

3
New cards

non-cognitive language

not subject to being true or false e.g., expressing an opinion

4
New cards

absolutism

the nature of morality holds no exceptions

5
New cards

relativists

the nature of morality is relative to each individual

6
New cards

ethical naturalism

the decision about what’s right or wrong can be arrived through discovery of the natural world. moral properties are natural properties, and ethical statements are the same as non-ethical statements

7
New cards

3 problems with ethical naturalism and who founded them

  • the is ought gap - Hume

  • naturalistic fallacy - Moore

  • open question argument - Moore

8
New cards

the is ought gap - Hume

confuse what is the case with how it ought to be, without explaining how they got from the former to the latter

you can’t go from an objective claim to a subjective conclusion

9
New cards

the naturalistic fallacy - Moore

any attempt to define the word good in terms of some natural quality cannot be correct

10
New cards

the open question argument - Moore

turning any definition of good into a question, e.g., is pleasure good. if the question is open, then the definition is not analytically identical

11
New cards

Moore quote

“good is good and that is the end of the matter”

12
New cards

non-naturalism

can make objective statements about things which aren’t part of the natural world

13
New cards

intuitionism (non-naturalism)

what’s good can be known and identified through our intuition. we can reflect on the truth of moral judgements through our rational intuition.

14
New cards

strength of intuitions

you are able to overcome the naturalistic fallacy whilst maintaining that good exists objectively.

15
New cards

weakness of naturalistic fallacy

it does not explain moral disagreements as we don’t know who gives the moral facts and who gives the moral falsehoods.

16
New cards

weakness of naturalistic fallacy

“enforced silences will not help us to understand good”

17
New cards

H A Pritchard on intuitionism

intuitions may vary as some people have developed moral thinking

18
New cards

emotivism

ethical statements express a person’s emotions.

19
New cards
20
New cards
21
New cards
22
New cards
23
New cards
24
New cards