1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Barts et al vs. anthropic PBC
AI training was not illegal, but pirating of copyrighted books is
Harper & Row vs. nation enterprises
publishing stolen, unpublished copyrighted work is not fair use
campbell vs. acuff- rose music
commerical parody can count as fair use
fourth estate public benefit corp vs. wallstreet.com
copyright owner may not file for infringement until copyright offically registers
cox communication vs. sony music
ISP are not automatically liable for users illegally downloading music
Warner chappell music vs. nealy
copyright owners can recover monetary damaged for infringement that occured more than three years before lawsuit
Daubert vs. Merrell dow pharmecuticals
judges act as gatekeepers to ensure scientific expert is both reliable and relevant
US. vs. DOE
cannot avoid producing documents by claiming fifth amedment (bc it does not apply to egally required documents)
people vs. sneed
police can compel a suspect to unlock their smartphone w code if they have wrrant
DC applelate court case : brown
FBI violated citizen right by forcing him to open phone in custody without evidence
US vs. SCARFO
standard search warrant, keylogger legal
Traditional CD network
centralized servers
vulnerable to ddos and single failures
limited visibility
cost based on useage
single point of failure - total outages
simple set up/ integratioin
blockchain base cd network
decentralized p2p network
stronger security via p2p and cryptograpy
transparency
fewer middle managment potlentially lower to resource sharing
overall ystem reslient to p2p node fialures
complex set up
5th amendment
right to avoid self incrimination
4th amendment
no unreasonable searches and seizures, must have warrant
supervisory control data azquistion system
manage critical infrastructure, connected to internet, prone to hack
denial service attacks
cause damage by limiting access to resources
forgone conclusion doctrine
if state has evidence it is not against 5th amendment right
federal law prohibits…
state courts from prosecuting copyright infringement
what branch investigates the most cases for piracy
FBIT
US vs. alkabaz
Sexualy explicit violent stories are not a threat if there is no intent
cyber bullying must fall under these categories
causes fear or harm
affect emntal/physcial health
interferes w academics
interferes w ability to participate
name 3 of 5 evidentary issues judges consider
authenticity
relevance
hearsay
best evidence
potential prejudice
subgroup: hacktivists
promote cause, expose wrongdoing, usually in protest
subgroup: cyber terrorists
destruction motivated, want to cause fear,
forgone conclusion doctrine
if feds have evidence it isnt against 5th amendment right to compell you to open it
which laws guide judges’ decisions about whether to allow specific electronic evidence to be admitted into a trial.
federal rule of evidence
contributory liability
provider intended for their server to be used for infrignement
piracy
unauthorized use, distribution, or reselling of copyrighted materal
intelecctual property theft
unathorized use, selling, or distributin of government protected ideas