1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what was the aim of Chaney's study?
to see if the funhaler device can provide a positive reinforcement which leads to improved adherence in young asthmatics
what is adherence?
following instructions
what is operant conditioning?
learning by consequence
what method was used in the study?
field experiment, home setting
where did the study take place?
Australia, in the homes of the participants
what year did the study take place?
2004
what sample did chaney use?
32 children aged 1.5 to 6 years old, 22 boys and 10 girls.
the children already had an average duration of asthma for 2.2 years
what experimental design was used?
repeated measure design
what were the IVs and DVs in the study?
IV - whether the child used a standard spacer device or the funhaler
DV- the children's adherence and attitudes towards the funhaler
What was the proceedure?
participants were approached by the researcher in their own homes, the funhaler was not mentioned and the parents were given a questionnaire about their current use of an inhaler.
they were then given the funhaler for 2 weeks and they had to report over the phone on a random basis about their use.
matched questionnaires were completed by the parents after the use of the funhaler, during the study each parent was called randomly to find out if they had medicated their child the day before.
what were the findings collected at the end of the study?
68% of children found pleasure in using the funhaler
10% of children found pleasure in using the standard spacer
10% of parents felt happy medicating their child using the standard spacer
61% of parents felt happy medicating their child using the funhaler
what were the findings collected on the previous day?
16/27 parents reported medicating their child the previous day using the standard spacer
22/27 parents reported medicating their child the previous day using the funhaler