6. Judicial Review Remedies and Underlying Theories

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards

What are the main judicial review remedies under the Senior Courts Act 1981?

Mandatory, prohibiting, or quashing orders; a declaration or injunction

2
New cards

When are damages available in judicial review?

Only if the claimant would have a cause of action in an ordinary civil claim

3
New cards

Are judicial review remedies granted automatically upon finding unlawfulness?

No, remedies are discretionary; a court may refuse a remedy

4
New cards

When must the High Court refuse relief under Section 31(2A) SCA 1981?

If highly likely the outcome wouldn't be substantially different without the conduct

5
New cards

When can a court disregard Section 31(2A) requirements for refusal of relief?

If it is appropriate for reasons of exceptional public interest

6
New cards

What is a "quashing order" and its general effect?

It nullifies a public authority's unlawful decision

7
New cards

How does the type of unlawfulness affect a quashing order's impact?

If procedural, the same substantive decision may be remade. If substantive, likely not

8
New cards

What are "prospective quashing orders"?

Orders where quashing takes effect on a specified future date, or has limited retrospective effect

9
New cards

What is a "prohibiting order"?

It prevents a public authority from acting unlawfully in the future

10
New cards

Give an example of a prohibiting order's use.

Preventing a council from issuing new taxi licenses without prior consultation (Liverpool Taxi Fleet)

11
New cards

What is a "mandatory order"?

It forces decision-makers to do what they are legally required to do

12
New cards

Why are courts often reluctant to issue mandatory orders?

Due to separation of powers and a preference for declarations

13
New cards

Give a case example of a mandatory order.

Forcing the Secretary of State to make new air quality plans (ClientEarth)

14
New cards

Should public authority resources be considered when granting a mandatory order?

Yes, but an order cannot force diversion from other mandatory allocations

15
New cards

What are some factors in the Imam five-factor test for granting mandatory orders?

Contingency funds, duration of breach, effect on claimant, remedial steps

16
New cards

What is an "injunction" in judicial review?

Similar to prohibiting/mandatory orders; can be interim relief to prevent irreparable harm

17
New cards

What is a "declaration" in judicial review?

An authoritative statement about a legal issue, confirming unlawfulness without coercion

18
New cards

When might a declaration be particularly appropriate?

When other coercive orders are inappropriate but the court finds illegality

19
New cards

What is the "red light theory" of judicial review?

Premised on distrust of administrative discretion, emphasizing the judicial role in preventing abuse

20
New cards

What is the "green light theory" of judicial review?

Focuses on enabling policy-making, preferring political accountability over court intervention

21
New cards

What is the "ultra vires theory" of judicial review?

Courts intervene when a decision-maker acts beyond its legal powers (derived from Parliament)

22
New cards

What challenge did Ridge v Baldwin pose to the "ultra vires theory"?

The court found a breach of fairness despite no statutory provision for a hearing

23
New cards

What is the "common law theory" of judicial review?

Judicial review principles are creations of the courts and principles of good administration

24
New cards

What is the "modified ultra vires theory"?

Reconciles JR with parliamentary sovereignty by implying common law principles into Parliament's general intent

25
New cards

Why do these theories of judicial review matter?

They explain the courts' role in shaping JR and embody normative assumptions