ap gov unit 3 test 9 required supreme court cases

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
Get a hint
Hint

schenck v united states (1919)

1 / 8

9 Terms

1

schenck v united states (1919)

  • ww1 distributed leaflets against the draft

  • convicted of violating the espionage act of 1917

  • scotus ruled that it didn’t violate his 1st amendment right to freedom of speech

  • established the clear and present danger test

New cards
2

brown v board (1954)

declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, overturning the "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson.

New cards
3

engel v vitale (1962)

  • short voluntary prayer at start of school day in new york

  • scotus ruled that the prayer violated the establishment clause of the first amendment

New cards
4

gideon v wainwright (1963)

  • charged with a felony in florida

  • he requested a court appointed lawyer but the state refused

  • scotus ruled that 6th amendment right to counsel is applicable in state courts under the 14th amendment

New cards
5

tinker v des moines independent community school district (1969)

  • students wore wristbands to protest the vietnam war

  • scotus ruled that the school banning the wearing of wristbands as symbolic speech is unconstitutional under 1st amendment

  • free speech in schools

New cards
6

new york times co v united states (1971)

  • nixon administration tried to prevent new york times from publishing documents about vietnam war saying that it was dangerous (prior restraint)

  • scotus ruled that prior restraint violates 1st amendment freedom of the press

New cards
7

wisconsin v yoder (1972)

  • amish parents in wisconsin persecuted for pulling their kids out of school after 8th grade

  • scotus ruled that wisconsin’s requirement violated 1st amendment free exercise of religion

New cards
8

shaw v reno (1993)

  • north carolina redrew two districts to have a black majority

  • scotus ruled that racially gerrymandered districts violate the 14th amendment

New cards
9

mcdonald v chicago (2010)

  • tried to buy a gun in chicago but was stopped b/c of the city’s gun purchase bans

  • scotus ruled that 2nd amendment applies to states because of the 14th amendment due process clause

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 25 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 67 people
... ago
5.0(4)
note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 69 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 25 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 74 people
... ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 40 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 162 people
... ago
4.6(5)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (22)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 104 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (53)
studied byStudied by 7 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (39)
studied byStudied by 3 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (71)
studied byStudied by 27 people
... ago
4.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (41)
studied byStudied by 21 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (79)
studied byStudied by 32 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (39)
studied byStudied by 99 people
... ago
5.0(4)
robot