Engel v. Vitale (1962)

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Case study analysis of Engel v. Vitale (1962) in flashcard format.

16 Terms

1

What was the main issue in Engel v. Vitale (1962)?

Whether the reading of a voluntary, nondenominational prayer at the start of the school day violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

New cards
2

What was the Supreme Court’s ruling?

In a 6-1 decision, the Court ruled that the school-sponsored prayer was unconstitutional.

New cards
3

Which constitutional clause was central to the case?

The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

New cards
4

How did the Court justify its ruling?

The Court ruled that by composing and promoting an official school prayer, the government was endorsing religion, violating the separation of church and state.

New cards
5

Which amendment made the Establishment Clause applicable to the states?

The Fourteenth Amendment.

New cards
6

Who wrote the majority opinion?

Justice Hugo Black.

New cards
7

What was the main argument in the majority opinion?

Government should not compose official prayers or encourage religious practices in public schools, as it violates the Establishment Clause.

New cards
8

What historical argument did Justice Black make?

Many early American colonists fled religious persecution in England, and the Constitution was designed to prevent government involvement in religious practices.

New cards
9

How did the Court view government-sponsored prayer?

It viewed it as an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion.

New cards
10

Who wrote the concurring opinion?

Justice William Douglas

New cards
11

What was Justice Douglas’s argument for the concurring opinion?

Any government involvement in religious activities, including financial support for religious institutions, is unconstitutional.

New cards
12

Who wrote the dissenting opinion?

Justice Potter Stewart.

New cards
13

What was Justice Stewart’s argument for the dissenting opinion?

He believed allowing voluntary prayer did not establish an official religion and that preventing willing students from praying denied them their religious heritage.

New cards
14

What historical examples did Stewart cite for the dissenting opinion?

He referenced presidential speeches that included religious elements, arguing that government references to God were common in American history.

New cards
15

What precedent did Engel v. Vitale establish?

It reinforced the principle that public schools cannot sponsor or endorse religious practices.

New cards
16

How did this case affect future rulings?

It set a precedent for strict separation of church and state in public education, influencing cases on school prayer and religious activities in schools.

New cards
robot