Bandura

5.0(1)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/63

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Transmission of Aggression Through Imitation of Aggressive Models (1961)

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

64 Terms

1
New cards
Learning Approach
looks at observational learning, one of the main learning theories
2
New cards
Psychology
studies the social learning theory
3
New cards
social learning theory
comprised of attention, retention, reproduction, and motivation; can happen in two different ways - first-hand and by proxy
4
New cards
attention
must be paying attention to role model to learn in the first place
5
New cards
retention
need to store observations in long-term memory
6
New cards
reproduction
need to imitate the stored behavior
7
New cards
motivation
if rewarded for imitation, you want to repeat behavior, if punished, you want to stop behavior
8
New cards
first-hand social learning
in presence of person completing behavior
9
New cards
social learning by proxy
watched behavior through some type of media
10
New cards
Pavlov

(Background)
studied classical conditioning in dogs
11
New cards
John B. Watson

(Background)
applied Pavlovian principles to humans
12
New cards
Skinner

(Background)
taught us about learning through consequences
13
New cards
Bandura

(Background)
believes early learning theories are reductionistic
14
New cards
previous studies

(Background)
* proved children will imitate and copy behaviors
* behavior happened immediately in the same environment with role model still there
* never took gender into account
15
New cards
Aim
to investigate if social behaviors, particularly aggression, can be acquired through observation and later imitated
16
New cards
Sub-Aim #1
to test if we can learn to imitate a behavior when the role model is no longer present
17
New cards
Sub-Aim #2
to observe for any great differences in learning aggression
18
New cards
Hypothesis #1
If a behavior is observed, it will be imitated
19
New cards
Hypothesis #2
If a behavior is not observed, it cannot be imitated
20
New cards
Hypothesis #3
Boys will copy a male model more than a female model, and girls will copy a female model more than a male model
21
New cards
Hypothesis #4
Boys will be more predisposed than girls to imitating aggression
22
New cards
Independent Variables
conditions (aggressive model, non-aggressive model, and control group), gender of model, gender of child
23
New cards
Dependent Variable
number of aggressive behaviors out of a 240 maximum
24
New cards
Method
* laboratory experiment
* **independent measures:** can’t take out the behavior once it’s been placed there
* data collected in the behavioral direction and direct observation
* matched groups between non-aggressive and aggressive groups for pre-existing levels of aggression
25
New cards
Room 1 (Modeling) Apparatus
* potato prints and stickers
* tinker toys
* table and chair
* mallet
* 5 foot Bobo doll
26
New cards
Room 2 (Frustration-Aggression) Apparatus
* fire engine
* locomotive
* dolls
* top
27
New cards
Room 3 (Observation)
* potato prints and stickers
* tinker toys
* table and chair
* mallet
* 3 foot Bobo doll
* one-way mirror
* 2 dart guns
28
New cards
Participants
72 children (36 male, 36 female) ranging from 37 to 69 months in age, with a mean age of 4.4 years, randomly sampled from Stanford University Nursery School; likely higher on the socioeconomic scale and have at least one college-educated parent
29
New cards
Control #1
Model will always do the same behaviors in the same sequence for the same amount of time
30
New cards
Control #2
The toys in rooms 1 and 3 will always be in the same places at the start of the study
31
New cards
Control #3
The observations will always be done by 2 independent observers for the same duration (20 minutes), and each will take data every 5 seconds
32
New cards
Control #4
The levels of pre-existing aggression will be assessed by both the researcher and the nursery school teacher
33
New cards
Step 1 (Procedure)
Every child is assessed for their pre-existing levels of aggression, then each child between the aggressive and non-aggressive group will be matched.
34
New cards
Step 2 (Procedure)
Each child will be individually brought by the experimenter into Room 1, where there will be a model for the aggressive and non-aggressive groups. The child will be allowed to settle in, while the model plays in the corner. In the non-aggressive model, everyone continues playing, and in the aggressive model, the model will punch the Bobo doll, hit it with the mallet, throw it, and kick it, vocalizing their actions as they perform them
35
New cards
Step 3 (Procedure)
After 10 minutes in Room 1, the child will be taken into Room 2. The child will be allowed to play with the toys for 2 minutes, and then the child is told the toys are “only for the best children.”
36
New cards
Step 4 (Procedure)
After the child is frustrated, they are brought into Room 3, where they will be left with the toys for 20 minutes, and their behavior will be observed through the one-way mirror. The child is sent back to the nursery school afterward
37
New cards
Data
quantitative - behavioral checklist

qualitative - in Room 1, researchers wrote down comments made by the children
38
New cards
imitated aggression
exact reproduction of model’s behavior
39
New cards
partially imitated aggression
similar reproduction of model’s behavior
40
New cards
non-imitated aggression
something the model didn’t do
41
New cards
Finding #1
Children who saw the aggression model were significantly more aggressive than the non-aggressive and control groups
42
New cards
Finding #2
There is very little difference in aggression levels between the non-aggressive and control groups
43
New cards
Finding #3
Boys were significantly more likely to imitate an aggressive male model
44
New cards
Finding #4
Boys were significantly more physically aggressive
45
New cards
Finding #5
Children in all groups played aggressively with the dart guns
46
New cards
Conclusion #1
Observed behavior is more likely to be imitated
47
New cards
Conclusion #2
All hypotheses were supported
48
New cards
Confidentiality (Ethics)
maintained; pictures of the children were published with the study but it was allowed by parents
49
New cards
Ethics
Loco parentis would have been required in the use of children, and informed consent was likely given by the nursery school teacher, not the parents. Protection from harm wasn’t upheld; children were exposed to dart guns and the mallet, it is unknown how long the effects of the study last, and positive replacement was not used for the aggressive behavior. Debriefing did not occur
50
New cards
Strength #1
There is high inter-scorer reliability in the pre-existing aggression (0.89) and the observations (0.9)
51
New cards
Strength #2
The use of quota sampling provides comparable data
52
New cards
Strength #3
Matched groups controlled for aggression and as an independent variable
53
New cards
Strength #4
There was a high level of controls, so it is highly likely only the aggressive model made a difference in the outcome of the study
54
New cards
Strength #5
High standardization of the procedure allows for replication
55
New cards
Weakness #1
There is low ecological validity in a laboratory setting
56
New cards
Weakness #2
The task of a child playing with toys while an adult plays with kids’ toys lacks mundane realism
57
New cards
Weakness #3
The children coming from higher socioeconomic backgrounds and having a small age range makes generalization difficult
58
New cards
Weakness #4
It is unknown whether the children were compliant to please the adults around them
59
New cards
Weakness #5
The aggression was taken out on an inanimate object
60
New cards
Weakness #6
The long term effects of the aggression are unknown
61
New cards
Weakness #7
It is unknown whether the novelty of the toy made a difference in aggression
62
New cards
Application

(Issues & Debates)
* to TV networks limiting aggressive programming and promoting pro-social programming
* helping parents pick appropriate programming for their children
63
New cards
Nature vs. Nurture

(Issues & Debates)
Matched pairs nullified nature affecting the outcome
64
New cards
Use of Children (Issues & Debates)
Positive

* honest/lack of a social filter
* demand characteristics aren’t an issue

Negative

* may have been distressed
* exposed to psychological harm through intentional frustration