Power vacuum cont.

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/130

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:22 AM on 5/25/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

131 Terms

1
New cards

How did Marxist ideology contribute to the lack of clear leader?

According to Marxist ideology, power should be shared by a collective leadership rather than by a single, dominating figure. There was therefore no mechanism for any such leader to be chosen

2
New cards

How had Lenin shaped the nature of leadership and gone agaisnt traditional marxist theory?

Lenin was such a forceful, controlling leader that it was difficult to imagine a future in Russia without a single figure of authority directing p9olicy

3
New cards

What were some people’s attitudes to collective leadership?

Some felt that whilst Lenin’s absolute control of the government may have been justifiable during the Civil War, this type of one-man leadership was no longer necessary and now that Lenin was dead, the country should tranisition to Marxist collective leadership

4
New cards

Who mainly advanced the idea of collective leadership?

Opponents of Trotsky who feared he may become a military dictator

5
New cards

When did the power vacuum sort of start?

Began to take shape in 1922 after Lenin became seriously incapacitated by his first stroke

6
New cards

Why had the triumvirate formed after Lenin’s stroke?

Block Trotsky’s ambitions

7
New cards

Was Stalin popular amongst his colleagues?

No

8
New cards

When did Lenin have his second and third strokes and lost the ability to speak

December 1922

9
New cards

In what way did Lenin still have a strong political presence even after his strokes?

He had ‘minders’ who looked after him and passed on his wishes to the party, one of whom was Stalin who tried to remain in personal contact with Lenin as much as possible

10
New cards

When did Lenin first dictate his testament?

December 1922

11
New cards

When did Lenin add the postscript to his testament?

January 1923

12
New cards

What did Lenin add in the postscript of his testament?

Was even harsher towards Stalin (describing him as ‘too coarse’) and recommended he be removed from the role of Party Secretary

13
New cards

What was Lenin’s Testament largely?

An assessment of his colleagues and cast shadows of doubt over all the likely candidates to succeed him

14
New cards

What might explain Lenin’s harsh criticism of Stalin?

personal dislike, Stalin’s brutal actions in crushing dissent in Georgia (yet he lied about what he had done and said the Menshevik presence there had been crushed by popular uprising - not true), Stalin had recently insulted Lenin’s wife

15
New cards

What could maybe be deduced from the testament, even though Lenin did not make this clear?

Since Lenin did not name a successor in his Testament, it is possible he believed in the idea of group leadership (doubtful)

16
New cards

In what way could Lenin be seen as being not too harsh in his testament?

Although he reiterated that Zinoviev and Kamenev’s betrayal during the Oct Rev ‘was not, of course, accidental’, he said that this shouldn’t be held against them. He equally said the same for Trotsky’s ‘non-Bolshevism’

17
New cards

What did Lenin say about Bukharin in his testament?

That he was valuable, liked and a great theoretician but it was doubtful whether he was ‘fully Marxist’

18
New cards

What did Lenin want to happen with his testament?

He wanted it to be read out at the next party congress after his death

19
New cards

Who were largely responsible for the testament not being read, why?

Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev - they had all been heavily criticised in the testament

20
New cards

In what way did the testament continue to be dangerous?

It remained lurking as ammunition that could be used in the leadership struggle. Although the contents were not revealed to the public, the leaders of the party knew, for example, that Lenin had turned against Stalin

21
New cards

What kind of reputation did Stalin have by 1924?

Man of violence and an immensely hard worker who was an expert in dealing with the details of bureaucratic organisation

22
New cards

In what way was Stalin seen by his colleagues as inferior to them?

Was the son of a cobbler so was not as well-educated as some other members of the party, he was not as prominent in the seizure of power in 1917 as others. Meant they underestimated Stalin

23
New cards

What was Stalin’s pet nickname used by lots of his allies e.g. Bukharin?

Koba

24
New cards

What were the positive traits associated with Stalin?

Seen as reasonable and reliable, had a deep understanding of the expanding party machinery, could be patient (namely in his ability to keep his long-term aims hidden and wait for the right time to enact revenge on his enemies)

25
New cards

What was Stalin skilled at?

Gaining the loyalty of trusted subordinates

26
New cards

How was Stalin’s deliberate closeness to Lenin advantageous to him?

He was able to claim he knew what Lenin wanted

27
New cards

Who was Stalin overshadowed by ?

Those of greater prominence, like Trotsky, or greater popularity, like Bukharin

28
New cards

In what way was Stalin quite lucky in the leadership struggle?

Given he was one of the most fiercely attacked people in the testament, he was fortunate that the other bolshevik leaders had adequate reason to want to keep the testament secret

29
New cards

How did Stalin utilise Lenin’s family?

In 1926, Lenin’s sister (Mariya) was enlisted to defend Stalin against criticisms from his opponents in the Politburo

30
New cards

In 1924, who was regarded as the most important figure in the party aside from Lenin himself?

Trotsky

31
New cards

When did Lenin die?

January 1924

32
New cards

In what way could Trotsky be seen as distancing himself from potential supporters within the party?

He was dismissive of those he perceived as having lesser abilities and was often unwilling to get involved in the boring details of party administration

33
New cards

In what way could Trotsky’s ability to lead be lessened?

He was apparently prone to sudden but frequent bouts of illness and inaction, seemingly ‘freezing’ at times of crisis

34
New cards

In what way could Trotsky’s arrogance be seen in the leadership struggle?

He made no real attempt to build himself a support base

35
New cards

How do Trotsky’s alliances demonstrate his inconsistent nature?

Although he opposed the triumvirate of Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev, he later allied with Zinoviev and Kamenev against Stalin

36
New cards

What grave error did Trotsky make in 1924?

He attacked the party bureaucracy at the time when he most needed its support

37
New cards

How were Trotsky and Kamenev related?

They were brothers-in-law until 1927

38
New cards

What positions in government did Kamenev hold?

Chairman of the Moscow Soviet (1918), one of the first Politburo members (1919) and was Lenin’s Deputy Chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars

39
New cards

In what way was Kamenev not really ever going to succeed in the leadership struggle?

Like Zinoviev, he saw himself as a key figure in collective leadership but may’ve lacked the political ambition and ruthlessness needed to establish himself as Russia’s sole leader. He tended to be inconsistent in his decision making and gained a reputation as someone who would frequently change sides

40
New cards

What shows Lenin was very close with Kamenev?

In 1922, after his stroke, Lenin entrusted many of his personal papers to kamenev

41
New cards

Did Kamenev have great influence?

Yes - he was a long-standing Bolshevik and had helped to craft Party policy

42
New cards

As well as his personality, in what way was Kamenev never going to be sole leader?

He was very closely linked to Zinoviev, who was more popular in the party than he was

43
New cards

In what way did Zinoviev possess the necessary skills to lead?

He was one of the Party’s strongest speech-makers and had a very commanding presence, as exhibited during his time as Chairman of the Comintern

44
New cards

What negative traits were associated with Zinoviev?

Vanity, inconsistency and proneness to unpredictable mood changes

45
New cards

How was Zinoviev perceived in terms of ideology?

Seen as a compromiser lacking in any consistent philosophy and someone who would buckle under pressure

46
New cards

What did Lenin call Zinoviev, indicating how close they were?

his ‘closest and most trusted assistant’

47
New cards

In what way did Zinoviev have a strong power base?

Was head of the party in Leningrad, power base second in importance only to Moscow

48
New cards

As well as leaking the details of the revolution, what else did Kamenev and Zinoviev (and also Rykov) do in October 1917 that furthered suspicions of disloyalty?

Resigned

49
New cards

Who consistently supported Bukharin on the right of the party?

Rykov and Tomsky

50
New cards

What was the name of Stalin and Bukharin’s collaborative relationship?

The Duumvirate

51
New cards

Other than ideological factors, what else contributed to the Duumvirate falling apart?

Stalin (easily jealous) envied Bukharin’s popularityq

52
New cards

How did Lenin describe Bukharin?

'the darling of the Party’

53
New cards

What areas was Bukharin particularly an expert on ?

Economy and agriculture

54
New cards

In what way did Bukharin’s likeable personality work against him/

He tried to remain on good terms with everyone and resist in-fighting but this meant he had no power base

55
New cards

In what way was Bukharin naïve towards Stalin

He underestimated Stalin - since Bukharin was so popular, he was inevitable going to be a target of Stalin’s enmity

56
New cards

What was one tactical mistake Bukharin made?

Left it too late to make an alliance with Zinoviev and Kamenev

57
New cards

Where on the ideological scale was Rykov?

Moderate within the party ideologically

58
New cards

What was Rykov’s relationship with Lenin like?

Although he was always loyal to Lenin, he frequently disagreed with Lenin and the more radical members of the Party.

59
New cards

Whose views was Rykov aligned with?

Bukharin and Tomsky

60
New cards

Why was Rykov well-respected within the party?

He had been an active Bolshevik since the days of the revolution and had played a key role in implementing War Communism and the NEP

61
New cards

Which group did Rykov have considerable support from?

The Sovnarkom - he was made Deputy Chairman in 1923 and then Chairman in 1924

62
New cards

In what way was Rykov overshadowed?

Amongst the moderates, Rykov was overshadowed by Bukharin’s popularity and ability

63
New cards

Which of Rykov’s policies stirred up considerable opposition?

Heavy taxation of vodka

64
New cards

In what way was Rykov’s loyalty called into question?

He had argued against Lenin over revolutionary tactics in 1917

65
New cards

What kind of political views did Tomsky have?

Moderate

66
New cards

What made Tomsky reasonably popular in the party>

He was an Old Bolshevik and was one of the few Bol leaders from proletariat background

67
New cards

What positions did Tomsky hold within the party?

Chief spokesman for the trade unions, general secretary of the red international of the trade unions, elected to CC and Politburo in 1922

68
New cards

In what way was Tomsky’s intense hostility towards Trotsky detrimental>?

It blinded him to an even greater danger (Stalin). His alliance with Stalin, Rykov and Bukharin in purging left-wingers in the Party in 1926 handed massive potential power to Stalin

69
New cards

In what way was Tomsky an inevtiable target by Stalin?

He had considerable support base through the trade unions

70
New cards

Which of Tomsky’s ideologies was to be used against him?

His support for the NEP in 1927 when the grain crisis hit

71
New cards

What did Tomsky fall out with Lenin over?

The role of trade unions in the NEP

72
New cards

Who are some examples of pallbearers at Lenin’s funeral?

Stalin, Kamenev and Tomsky

73
New cards

How did Zinoviev and Jamenev’s political alliances change?

As they grew anxious about Stalin’s growing power, they switched their support to Trotsky and the Left

74
New cards

Why was the issue of economic policy so controversial within the Party?

it was inseparable from the ideological debates about Marxism and Leninism

75
New cards

In what way was the NEP against Marxist theory?

it allowed private enterprise to continue, contradictory to revolutionary socialism

76
New cards

Who wanted to abandon the NEP?

The ‘Left’ - Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev

77
New cards

Who wanted to continue the NEP?

The ‘Right’ - Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky

78
New cards

What was Stalin’s stance on the NEP?

Inconsitent, fluctuated from a left-leaning position up to 1925, then switch and supported the continuance of the NEP up until 1928, then switched back in 1928-29 to a policy of replacing the NEP with a revolutionary surge towards rapid industrialisation and collectivisation

79
New cards

In what way was the Marxist theory of world revolution being contradicted by real-world events?

The failed revolutions in Germany, Hungary, etc. Defeat in the Russo-Polish War blocked the spread of communism further west

80
New cards

Which side believed in permanent revolution?

The Left (e.g. Trotsky)

81
New cards

What was the Left’s stance on permanent revolution?

that the USSR should give support to the Comintern in formenting revolutions across the world until there was a truly socialist society in every country

82
New cards

When did Stalin start to believe in Socialism in One Country?

1923

83
New cards

What can be said about the Right’s stance on ideological debates during the power struggle?

Their ideology was generally a compromise with traditional Marxist beliefs - the NEP was a compromise, Socialism in One Country was a compromise with the reality of the international situation

84
New cards

Why did the Right idea of NEP and Socialism in One Country appeal to some people?

It brought greater stability, unlike the continuous revolutionary turmoil that Trotsky was advocating

85
New cards

What power was Stalin given that allowed him to utilise Lenin’s funeral as a political tool?

Was put in charge of the arrangements for Lenin’s funeral

86
New cards

How did Stalin use Lenin’s funeral as a way to promote the cult of Leninism?

Turned it into a state occasion

87
New cards

What illness was Trotsky convalescing from when he missed Lenin’s funeral?

Influenza

88
New cards

What could be seen as one of Trotsky’s early mistakes in his conflict with Stalin

Given the contents of the (admittedly secret) testament, the 13th Party Congress in May 1924 would’ve been the perfect opportunity for action to be taken against Stalin but Trotsky hesitated

89
New cards

Why might have Trotsky not taken action against Stalin in the 13th Party Congress?

Feared being blamed for a split in the Party, Stalin had the strong support of Zinoviev and Kamenev (triumvirate)

90
New cards

Who were some of Stalin’s supporters that he promoted to positions of pwoer/

Molotov (Assistant General Secretary), Kaganovich (first secretary of the Party in Ukraine) and Kirov (in 1926, replaced Zinoviev as head of the Party in Petrograd)

91
New cards

When was Trotsky forced out of his position as Commissar for War?

January 1925

92
New cards

How did Stalin demonstrate his determination to constantly adopt a moderate position?

Zinoviev was pushing for Trotsky’s expulsion from the Party in 1925 but Stalin rejected this

93
New cards

Describe the breaking apart of the triumvirate

As the threat of Trotsky grew smaller, the triumvirate had fewer strategic advances and by 1924/25, Zinoviev and Kamenev were growing frustrated by their inability to control Stalin. By September 1925, Zinoviev and Kamenev were openly opposing Stalin in the CC and by December 1925, a direct attack on Stalin had been launched

94
New cards

Why was Zinoviev and Kamenev’s attack on Stalin ineffective?

It was hard as they had frequently backed Stalin’s view on the dangers of ‘factionalism’ just a year before and from 1925, they were easily painted as factionalists endangering the security of the USSR

95
New cards

What was the result of Zinoviev and Kamenev’s failed attack on Stalin?

They were pushed closer and closer to allying with their former enemy, Trotsky

96
New cards

Who was essentially running the country in 1926-1927?

The Duumvirate - Stalin and Bukharin

97
New cards

When did Zinoviev and Kamenev join with Trotsky?

mid 1926

98
New cards

What was the infighting like in the first half of 1926?

Largely conducted through books and pamphlets in which the Bol leaders attacked the ideology of their opponents and promoted their own ideas. Known as the ‘Literary Discussion’

99
New cards

What was the outcome of the Literary Discussion

Trotsky was not victorious, contrary to what may have been expected. Instead, Stalin’s line appealed to the majority of party members

100
New cards

When did the pressure Stalin faced from the Left Opposition intensify

Late 1926 (stalin even offered to give up his post as General Secretary in December) - 1927 (Stalin blamed for the crushing of the Chinese Communists in Canton and Shanghai)