1/41
International Financial Management
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
International Financial Management (International Finance)
means financial management in an international business environment
different due to different currency in each countries with dissimilar political situations, imperfect markets, & diversified opportunity sets
International Monetary System (IMS)
institutional framework within which international payments are made, movements of capital are accommodated, & exchange rates among currencies are determined
complex whole of agreements, rules, institutions, mechanisms, & policies regarding exchange rates, international payments, & the flow of capital
evolved over time & will continue to do so in the future as the fundamental business & political conditions underlying the world economy continue to shift
Evolution of International Monetary System
Bimetallism (before 1875)
Classical Gold Standard (1875-1914)
Interwar Period (1915-1944)
Bretton Woods System (1945-1972)
Flexible Exchange Rate Regime (1973-Present)
Bimetallism
before 1875
double standard in that free coinage was maintained for both gold and silver
IMS before 1870s can be characterized as “bimetallism” in the sense that both gold & silver were used as IMP & that the exchange rates among currencies were determined by either their gold or silver contents
countries with bimetallic standard experienced the Gresham’s Law
Gresham’s Law
monetary principle stating that when there are 2 forms of commodity money in circulation, which are accepted by law as legal tender & the same face values
more valuable one – ‘good money’ – will be hoarded & will disappear from circulation
less valuable one ‘bad money’ – will be passed on (used for transactions)
Classical Gold Standard
1875-1914
international gold standard can be said to exist when, in most major countries
gold is assured of unrestricted coinage
2-way convertibility between gold & national currencies at a stable ratio
gold may be freely exported or imported
exchange rate between any two currencies will be determined by their gold content
first full-fledged gold standard was not established until 1821 in Great Britain when notes from the BOE were made fully redeemable for gold
France was effectively on the gold standard beginning in the 1850s and formally adopted the standard in 1878
newly emergent German empire, which was to receive a sizable war indemnity from France, converted to the gold standard in 1875, discontinuing free coinage of silver
US adopted the gold standard in 1879, Russia and Japan in 1897
Interwar Period
1915-1944
characterized by economic nationalism, half-hearted attempts & failure to restore the gold standard, economic & political instabilities, bank failures, & panicky flights of capital across borders
no coherent IMS prevailed during this period, with profoundly detrimental effects on international trade & investment
U.S. dollar emerged as the dominant world currency, gradually replacing the British pound for the role
Bretton Woods System
1945-1972
July 1944: representatives of 44 nations gathered at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to discuss and design the post-war IMS
representatives succeeded in drafting and signing the Articles of Agreement of the IMF, which constitutes the core of the Bretton Woods system
agreement was subsequently ratified by the majority of countries to launch the IMF in 1945
IMF embodied an explicit set of rules about the conduct of international monetary policies and was responsible for enforcing these rules
Delegates also created a sister institution, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the World Bank, that was chiefly responsible for financing individual development projects
each country established a par value in relation to the U.S. dollar, which was pegged to gold at $35 per ounce
Triffin Paradox
under the gold-exchange system, the reserve-currency country should run BOP deficits to supply reserves, but if such deficits are large and persistent, they can lead to a crisis of confidence in the reserve currency itself, causing the downfall of the system
responsible for the eventual collapse of the dollar-based gold exchange system in the early 1970s
Flexible Exchange Rate Regime
1973-present
followed the demise of the Bretton Woods system
ratified after the fact in January 1976 when the IMF members met in Jamaica and agreed to a new set of rules for the IMS
continued to provide assistance to countries facing BOP and exchange rate difficulties
extended assistance and loans to the member countries on the condition that those countries follow the IMF’s macroeconomic policy prescriptions
September 1985: G-5 countries (France, Japan, Germany, UK, US) met at the Plaza Hotel in New York and reached what became known as the Plaza Accord
agreed that it would be desirable for the dollar to depreciate against most major currencies to solve the U.S. trade deficit problem and expressed their willingness to intervene in the exchange market to realize this objective. The slide of the dollar that had begun in February was further precipitated by the Plaza Accord
Louvre Accord marked the inception of the managed-float system under which the G-7 countries would jointly intervene in the exchange market to correct over- or undervaluation of currencies
Conditionality
involves deflationary macroeconomic policies and elimination of various subsidy programs, provoked resentment among the people of developing countries receiving the IMF’s BOP loans
Jamaica Agreement
Flexible exchange rates were declared acceptable to the IMF members, & central banks were allowed to intervene in the exchange markets to iron out unwarranted volatilities
Gold was officially abandoned as an international reserve asset. Half of the IMF’s gold holdings were returned to the members and the other half were sold, with the proceeds to be used to help poor nations
Non-oil-exporting countries and less-developed countries were given greater access to IMF funds
Current Exchange Rate Agreements (CERA)
classification system is based on IMF member countries’ actual, de facto arrangements, as identified by IMF staff, which can be different from the officially announced arrangements
system classifies exchange rate arrangements primarily based on the degree to which the exchange rate is determined by the market rather than by official government action, with market-determined rates generally being more flexible
IMF currently classifies exchange rate arrangements into 10 separate regimes
First Regime of CERA
No separate legal tender
currency of another country circulates as the sole legal tender
adopting such an arrangement implies complete surrender of the monetary authorities’ control over the domestic monetary policy
Ecuador, El Salvador, & Panama
Second Regime of CERA
Currency Board
currency board arrangement is a monetary arrangement based on an explicit legislative commitment to exchange domestic currency for a specified foreign currency at a fixed exchange rate, combined with restrictions on the issuing authority to ensure the fulfillment of its legal obligation
implies that domestic currency is usually fully backed by foreign assets, eliminating traditional central bank functions such as monetary control and lender of last resort, and leaving little room for discretionary monetary policy
Hong Kong, Bulgaria, & Brunei
Third Regime of CERA
Conventional peg
country formally (de jure) pegs its currency at a fixed rate to another currency or a basket of currencies, where the basket is formed, for example, from the currencies of major trading or financial partners & weights reflect the geographic distribution of trade, services, or capital flows
anchor currency or basket weights are public or notified to the IMF
country authorities stand ready to maintain the fixed parity through direct intervention (i.e., via sale or purchase of foreign exchange in the market) or indirect intervention (e.g., via exchange-rate-related use of interest rate policy, imposition of foreign exchange regulations, exercise of moral suasion that constrains foreign exchange activity, or intervention by other public institutions)
no commitment to irrevocably keep the parity, but the formal arrangement must be confirmed empirically: the exchange rate may fluctuate within narrow margins of less than positive-negative 1 percent around a central rate—or the maximum & minimum value of the spot market exchange rate must remain within a narrow margin of 2 percent for at least 6 months
Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Morocco
Fourth Regime of CERA
Stabilized arrangement
entails a spot market exchange rate that remains within a margin of 2 percent for 6 months or more (with the exception of a specified number of outliers or step adjustments) and is not floating
Required margin of stability can be met either with respect to a single currency or a basket of currencies, where the anchor currency or the basket is ascertained or confirmed using statistical techniques
Cambodia, Angola, & Lebanon
Fifth Regime of CERA
Crawling peg
involves the confirmation of the country authorities’ de jure exchange rate arrangement
currency is adjusted in small amounts at a fixed rate or in response to changes in selected quantitative indicators, such as past inflation differentials vis-à-vis major trading partners or differentials between the inflation target and expected inflation in major trading partners
Bolivia & Nicaragua
Sixth Regime of CERA
Crawl-like arrangement
exchange rate must remain within a narrow margin of 2 percent relative to a statistically identified trend for 6 months or more (with the exception of a specified number of outliers), and the exchange rate arrangement cannot be considered as floating
minimum rate of change greater than allowed under a stabilized (peg-like) arrangement is required
Ethiopia, China, & Croatia
Seventh Regime of CERA
Pegged exchange rate within horizontal bands
value of the currency is maintained within certain margins of fluctuation of at least positive-negative 1 percent around a fixed central rate, or the margin between the maximum and minimum value of the exchange rate exceeds 2 percent.
Tonga
Eighth Regime of CERA
Other managed arrangement
residual
used when the exchange rate arrangement does not meet the criteria for any of the other categories
Arrangements characterized by frequent shifts in policies may fall into this category
Costa Rica, Switzerland, and Russia.
Ninth Regime of CERA
Floating
floating exchange rate is largely market determined, without an ascertainable or predictable path for the rate
exchange rate that satisfies the statistical criteria for a stabilized or a crawl-like arrangement will be classified as such unless it is clear that the stability of the exchange rate is not the result of official actions
Foreign exchange market intervention may be either direct or indirect and serves to moderate the rate of change and prevent undue fluctuations in the exchange rate, but policies targeting a specific level of the exchange rate are incompatible with floating
Brazil, Korea, Turkey, & India
Tenth Regime of CERA
Free floating
floating exchange rate can be classified as free floating if intervention occurs only exceptionally and aims to address disorderly market conditions and if the authorities have provided information or data confirming that intervention has been limited to at most three instances in the previous 6 months, each lasting no more than 3 business days
Canada, Mexico, Japan, Israel, U.K., United States, and euro zone.
Balance of Payments (Balance of International Payments or BOP)
statement that contains the transactions made by residents of a particular country with the rest of the world over a specific time period
summarizes all payments and receipts by firms, individuals, and the government
transactions can be both factor payments and transfer payments
2 accounts: Current and Capital
Current Account
Visible trade
Invisible Trade
Unilateral transfers to and from abroad
Income receipts and payments
Visible Trade
net of export and imports of goods (visible items).
balance of this visible trade is known as the trade balance
trade deficit when imports are higher than exports
trade surplus when exports are higher than imports
Invisible Trade
net of exports and imports of services (invisible items)
transactions mainly consist of shipping, IT, banking, and insurance services
Unilateral transfers to and from abroad
refer to payments that are not factor payments – for example, gifts or donations sent to the resident of a country by a non-resident relative
Income receipts and payments
include factor payments and receipts
generally rent on property, interest on capital, and profits on investments
Capital Account
used to finance the deficit in the current account or absorb the surplus in the current account
Loans to and borrowings from abroad
Investments to/from abroad
Changes in foreign exchange reserves
Loans to and borrowings from abroad
consist of all loans and borrowings given to or received from abroad. It includes both private sector loans, as well as public sector loans.
Investments to/from abroad
investments made by nonresidents in shares in the home country or investment in real estate in any other country
Changes in foreign exchange reserves
Foreign exchange reserves are maintained by the central bank to control the exchange rate and ultimately balance the BOP
Current account deficit is financed by a surplus in the Capital account and vice versa
can be done by borrowing more money from abroad or lending more money to non-residents
Significance of BOP
BOP data is important to a lot of users
Investment managers, government policymakers, the central bank, businessmen, etc., all use the BOP data to make important decisions. The BOP data is affected by vital macroeconomic variables such as exchange rate, price levels, interest rates, employment, and GDP
Monetary and fiscal policies are formed in a way to achieve very specific objectives, which generally exert a significant impact on the BOP. Policies can be formed with the objectives to induce or curb foreign inflows or outflows
Businesses use BOP to analyze the market potential of a country, especially in the short term. A country with a large trade deficit is not as likely to import as much as a country with a trade surplus. If there is a large trade deficit, the government may adopt a policy of trade restrictions, such as quotas or tariffs.
Corporate Governance (CG)
something altogether different from the daily operational management activities enacted by a company’s executives
system of direction & control that dictates how a board of directors governs & oversees a company
International Perspective: concerns the system by which companies are directed and controlled
about having companies, owners & regulators become more accountable, efficient & transparent, which in turn builds trust & confidence
Well-governed companies carry lower financial and non-financial risks & generate higher shareholder returns
have better access to external finance & reduce systemic risks due to corporate crises & financial scandals
Reliable financial reporting, timely disclosures, better boards & accountable management also facilitate development of stronger capital markets
improve a country’s ability to mobilize, allocate & monitor investments & help foster jobs and economic growth
better supervision & monitoring can detect corporate inefficiencies & minimize vulnerability to financial crises
Key Principle of Corporate Governance
Shareholder Primacy
recognition of shareholders
recognition is two-fold
first, basic recognition of the importance of shareholders to any company – people who buy the company’s stock fund its operations. Equity is one of the major sources of funding for businesses
second, from the basic recognition of shareholder importance follows the principle of responsibility to shareholders
policy of allowing shareholders to elect a board of directors is critical. The board’s “prime directive” is to be always seeking the best interests of shareholders. The BOD hires & oversees the executives who comprise the team that manages the day-to-day operations of a company. This means that shareholders, effectively, have a direct say in how a company is run
Transparency
shareholder interest is a major part of corporate governance
shareholders may reach out to the members of the community who don’t necessarily hold an interest in the company but who can nonetheless benefit from its goods or services
reaching out to the members of the community encourages lines of communication that promote company transparency
means that all members of the community – those who are directly or indirectly affected by the company – & members of the press get a clear sense of the company’s goals, tactics, & how it is doing in general
means that anyone, whether inside or outside the company, can choose to review & verify the company’s actions
fosters trust & is likely to encourage more individuals to patronize the company & possibly become shareholders as well
Security
increasingly important aspect of corporate governance
shareholders & customers/clients need to feel confident that their personal information is not being leaked or accessed by unauthorized users
it’s equally important to ensure that the company’s proprietary processes & trade secrets are secure
data breach is not just very expensive, it also weakens public trust in the company, which can have a drastically negative effect on its stock price
losing investor trust means losing access to capital that is necessary for corporate growth
Consequences of Poor Corporate Governance
biggest purposes of corporate governance is to set up a system of rules, policies, and practices for a company – in other words, to account for accountability
each major piece of the “government” – the shareholders, the BOD, the executive management team, & the company’s employees – is responsible to the others, therefore keeping them all accountable
part of this accountability is the fact that the board regularly reports financial information to the shareholders, which reflects the corporate governance principle of transparency
when good corporate governance is abandoned, a company runs the risk of collapse, and shareholders stand to suffer substantially.
Poor Corporate Governance
In Enron Corp., many of the executives used shady tactics & covert accounting methods to cover up the fact that they were essentially stealing from the company. Erroneous figures were passed along to the BOD, who failed to report the information to shareholder with responsible accounting methods gone out the window, shareholders were unaware that the company’s debts & liabilities totaled much more than the company could ever repay. The executives were eventually charged with a number of felonies, and the company went bankrupt. It killed employee pensions and hurt shareholders immeasurably.
Corporate Governance in the Financial Sector
Governance issues in financial institutions are similar but differ in important ways from those in non-financial companies
Financial institutions are charged with upholding the public's trust & protecting depositors
Balance sheets are opaquer, leading to less transparency & greater ability to conceal problems
Good governance requires boards & senior management to fulfill their fiduciary responsibilities by effectively communicating strategic business direction & risk appetite while assuring transparent & effective organization, risk assessment & mitigation, & sufficient capital support
Good governance complements traditional supervision of financial institutions, protects the interests of depositors & other investors in commercial banks, builds & maintains public confidence in the financial sector, & ultimately contributes to its integrity & credibility
Financial institutions are uniquely vulnerable to liquidity shocks which can result in institutional, & potentially, financial instability
Sound governance supports prudential supervision & regulation, enhancing the role and the effectiveness of the financial institution supervisor
Many developing countries are embarking on wide-ranging corporate governance reforms of their state-owned banks in order to improve their efficiency and transparency
Development banks are now playing a more prominent role in the economy of emerging markets
Development banks play a central role in financial inclusion, SME development &, housing, agriculture & infrastructure finance
Solid corporate governance allows these institutions to fulfill their mandates more effectively
Corporate Governance in Capital Markets
Corporate governance continues to be a key component of capital market development
Good CG reduces emerging market vulnerability to financial crises, reduces transaction costs & cost of capital, and leads to capital market development
Capital markets in turn are a major driver of transparency
In addition to private companies, many SOEs are also listing on the capital markets to access alternative sources of capital & enhance transparency
Good CG also encourages investor confidence & outside investment
As pension funds invest increasingly in equity markets, retirement savings are more secure when invested in well-governed companies
Enhancing the governance and capacity of securities markets and financial sector regulators using a corporate governance lens is becoming an important part of the agenda