Validity and Face Validity – Key Concepts

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

15 question-and-answer flashcards covering measurement validity, face validity, reactivity, and strategies to minimize reactivity.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

What is the definition of measurement validity?

The extent to which a measurement tool actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure.

2
New cards

Why do social scientists create operational definitions for theoretical concepts?

Because theoretical constructs cannot be directly observed or measured, operational definitions translate them into observable indicators so they can be studied empirically.

3
New cards

Which self-report questionnaire is commonly used as an operational measure of depression in research?

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

4
New cards

What does face validity evaluate in a measurement instrument?

Whether, on its surface, the instrument appears to measure the intended variable.

5
New cards

Who typically judges face validity?

Experts, judges, or the participants themselves based on logic and common sense rather than statistics.

6
New cards

Does establishing face validity require statistical analysis?

No. It is based on subjective impressions and logical assessment.

7
New cards

Can an instrument possess true validity even when face validity is low? Give an example.

Yes; for example, the Rorschach test or eye-movement measures during sleep may be valid despite lacking obvious face validity.

8
New cards

What is reactivity in the context of measurement?

A situation in which the act of measuring changes the behavior or responses being measured.

9
New cards

How can high face validity increase reactivity?

When participants easily see what is being measured, their awareness can alter their behavior and thus bias the results.

10
New cards

What is the difference between specific and non-specific reactivity?

Specific reactivity arises when participants think they know the precise research hypothesis, while non-specific reactivity stems from simply being in an experimental situation or under observation.

11
New cards

Provide an example of a measurement that may cause specific reactivity.

Attitude questionnaires, where answering the questions can influence subsequent behavior.

12
New cards

Provide an example of a study context that may involve non-specific reactivity.

Electrophysiological studies such as ERP recordings, where being wired to equipment can affect participants.

13
New cards

What is one strategy researchers use to reduce reactivity by avoiding participants’ awareness?

Employing unobtrusive (non-obtrusive) measures such as analyzing physical traces or archival records.

14
New cards

Give one example of an unobtrusive physical trace measure.

Examining the wear patterns on museum carpets to infer visitor traffic.

15
New cards

What is habituation as a technique to combat reactivity?

Repeated exposure to the experimental setting (e.g., constant experimenter, extended baseline, training sessions) so that participants become accustomed and behave more naturally.