Research Designs & Statistics Vocabulary

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/115

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A comprehensive set of vocabulary flashcards covering key research design and statistical concepts drawn from the lecture notes.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

116 Terms

1
New cards

Descriptive Study

Research that describes characteristics of a population or phenomenon without investigating cause-and-effect relationships (e.g., surveys, qualitative studies).

2
New cards

Survey

A descriptive research method that collects self-reported data from participants through questionnaires or interviews.

3
New cards

Qualitative Research

Investigates participants’ experiences or perceptions using non-numeric data such as words, images, or observations.

4
New cards

Observational Study

Research in which the investigator observes outcomes without manipulating variables (e.g., cohort studies).

5
New cards

Cohort Study

An observational design that follows a group with shared characteristics over time to assess outcomes.

6
New cards

Correlational Study

Examines the statistical relationship between two or more variables without inferring causation.

7
New cards

Comparative Study

Compares two or more groups or conditions to evaluate differences in outcomes.

8
New cards

Prospective Study

Collects data forward in time from the point of study initiation.

9
New cards

Retrospective Study

Analyzes existing data or past records to investigate outcomes that have already occurred.

10
New cards

Experimental Study

Research in which the investigator manipulates an independent variable and uses random assignment to establish cause-and-effect.

11
New cards

True Experimental Design

Includes random assignment, control groups, and manipulation of variables.

12
New cards

Quasi-Experimental Design

Lacks random assignment but still involves an intervention or manipulation.

13
New cards

Single-Subject Design

Research in which one participant (or small number) serves as both control and experimental unit; often includes blinding of participant and assessor.

14
New cards

Sample

The group of individuals actually studied, intended to represent the target population.

15
New cards

Randomization

Process of assigning participants to groups by chance to reduce bias.

16
New cards

Blinding

Concealing group assignment from participants, investigators, or assessors to minimize bias.

17
New cards

Single-Blinding

Only the participant (or assessor) is unaware of group assignment.

18
New cards

Double-Blinding

Both participants and investigators/assessors are unaware of group assignment.

19
New cards

Intention-to-Treat Analysis

Statistical approach that analyzes participants in the groups to which they were originally assigned regardless of adherence.

20
New cards

Convenience Sample

Participants are selected based on ease of access rather than random procedures.

21
New cards

Cross-Sectional Study

Collects data from a population at one specific point in time.

22
New cards

Longitudinal Study

Follows the same participants over an extended period to observe changes.

23
New cards

Random Sample

Every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the study

24
New cards

Random Assignment

Randomly allocates study participants to different interventions or groups. Ensures that all groups will be similar in the characteristics that are thought to affect outcome before the treatment begins

25
New cards

Variable

Any characteristic or factor that can vary and be measured or manipulated.

26
New cards

Equivalent Samples

Groups that are similar on key characteristics at baseline, reducing confounding.

27
New cards

Statistical Power

Probability that a test will detect a true difference when one exists.

28
New cards

Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM)

Instrument in which patients provide information about their own health status.

29
New cards

Objective Measure

Outcome assessed through direct observation or devices, minimizing subjectivity.

30
New cards

Subjective Measure

Outcome based on personal judgment or patient self-report.

31
New cards

Validity

Extent to which a measure accurately reflects the concept it intends to assess.

32
New cards

Content Validity

Degree to which a test covers all relevant facets of the construct.

33
New cards

Construct Validity

Degree to which a test truly measures the theoretical construct it claims to assess.

34
New cards

Reliability

Consistency or repeatability of a measurement.

35
New cards

Index Test

The diagnostic test under investigation.

36
New cards

Gold Standard

The best available method against which new tests are compared.

37
New cards

Nominal Data

Categorical data with no inherent order (e.g., yes/no, blood type).

38
New cards

Ordinal Data

Categorical data with a ranked order but unequal intervals (e.g., pain scale 0-10).

39
New cards

Interval Data

Numeric data with equal intervals and no true zero (e.g., temperature in °C).

40
New cards

Ratio Data

Numeric data with equal intervals and an absolute zero (e.g., weight, time).

41
New cards

Mean (x̄)

Arithmetic average of a set of values.

42
New cards

Median

Middle score in an ordered data set.

43
New cards

Mode

Most frequently occurring value in a data set.

44
New cards

Range

Difference between highest and lowest values in a data set.

45
New cards

Skew

Asymmetry in a distribution; can be positive (right) or negative (left).

46
New cards

Normal Distribution

Symmetrical, bell-shaped distribution where mean = median = mode.

47
New cards

Non-Parametric Data

Data that do not meet parametric test assumptions (normality, equal variance). abnormal distribution of data

48
New cards

Hypothesis Testing

Statistical procedure to decide whether to reject a null hypothesis.

49
New cards

Null Hypothesis (H0)

Statement that there is no effect or difference between groups.

50
New cards

Directional/Research Hypothesis

Predicts the existence and direction of an effect (e.g., treatment A > treatment B).

51
New cards

Standard Error of Measurement (SEM)

Estimate of the precision of individual scores; reflects measurement error.

52
New cards

Standard Deviation (SD)

Measure of variability indicating how much scores differ from the mean. one representation of the variability in a sample

53
New cards

Confidence Interval (CI)

Range of values that include the real or true mean for a population of people.

54
New cards

A Priori Power Calculation

Sample size estimation performed before data collection to ensure adequate power.

55
New cards

Alpha Level (α)

Threshold probability for rejecting null hypothesis, commonly set at 0.05.

56
New cards

Pearson Product-Moment Correlation

Measures linear relationship between two continuous variables (r).

57
New cards

Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)

Reliability statistic that accounts for agreement and absolute values for continuous data.

58
New cards

Kappa (κ)

Statistic measuring agreement for categorical data beyond chance.

59
New cards

Spearman’s Rho (ρ)

Non-parametric correlation for ranked/ordinal data.

60
New cards

Regression

Statistical method for predicting an outcome based on one or more predictors.

61
New cards

Chi-Square Test (χ²)

Analyzes differences in categorical (nominal) data frequencies.

62
New cards

Mann-Whitney U Test

Non-parametric test comparing two independent groups on ordinal/continuous data.

63
New cards

Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test

Non-parametric test comparing two related samples on ordinal/continuous data.

64
New cards

Kruskal-Wallis Test

Non-parametric alternative to one-way ANOVA for three or more independent groups.

65
New cards

Friedman Test

Non-parametric alternative to repeated-measures ANOVA for ordinal/continuous data.

66
New cards

T-Test

Parametric test comparing means of two groups (independent or paired).

67
New cards

ANOVA (Analysis of Variance)

Parametric test comparing means of three or more groups.

68
New cards

Repeated-Measures ANOVA

Compares multiple measurements taken from the same participants across time or conditions.

69
New cards

Sensitivity (SnNOut)

The proportion of people who actually have the condition who test POSITIVE. Ability of a test to correctly identify those with the condition;

70
New cards

False Negative

Test result that erroneously indicates absence of a condition when it is present.

71
New cards

Specificity (SpPIn)

The proportion of people who are free of the condition who test NEGATIVE Ability of a test to correctly identify those without the condition;

72
New cards

False Positive

Test result that erroneously indicates presence of a condition when it is absent.

73
New cards

Positive Predictive Value (PPV)

The proportion of people with a positive index test who actually have the condition of interest. Probability that a person with a positive test truly has the condition.

74
New cards

Negative Predictive Value (NPV)

The proportion of people with a negative index test who are actually free of the condition of index. Probability that a person with a negative test truly does not have the condition.

75
New cards

Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve

Graph plotting sensitivity vs (1-specificity) across test thresholds.

76
New cards

Likelihood Ratio

Ratio expressing how much a test result will change the odds of having a disease.

77
New cards

Nomogram

Graphical tool that uses likelihood ratios to convert pre-test to post-test probabilities.

78
New cards

Risk Ratio (Relative Risk)

Ratio of event probability in exposed vs unexposed groups.

79
New cards

Odds Ratio

Ratio of odds of an event occurring in one group to the odds in another group.

80
New cards

Celeration Line

Trend line used in single-subject designs to visualize rate of change over time.

81
New cards

P-Value

Probability of observing data as extreme as those collected if the null hypothesis is true.

82
New cards

Effect Size

Quantitative measure of the magnitude of a difference or relationship (e.g., Cohen’s d).

83
New cards

Risk of Bias

Likelihood that study design, conduct, or analysis systematically alters results.

84
New cards

Type I Error (α Error)

False positive; concluding a significant difference exists when it does not.

85
New cards

Type II Error (β Error)

False negative; failing to detect a real difference due to low power.

86
New cards

Clinical Meaningfulness

Extent to which study results have practical importance for patient care.

87
New cards

Minimal Detectable Change (MDC)

Smallest amount of change that exceeds measurement error.

88
New cards

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)

Smallest change in an outcome perceived as beneficial by patients.

89
New cards

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Article evaluated by independent experts before publication.

90
New cards

Primary Study

Original research collecting and analyzing new data.

91
New cards

Psychometric Study

Research evaluating measurement properties such as reliability and validity.

92
New cards

Case Report

Detailed description of a single patient’s clinical presentation and outcomes.

93
New cards

Case-Control Study

Observational design comparing individuals with a condition to those without to identify risk factors.

94
New cards

Observational Study

Research in which investigators assess outcomes without intervention.

95
New cards

Survey Study

Research collecting data through questionnaires to describe characteristics or opinions.

96
New cards

Qualitative Method – Photovoice

Participants use photographs to document and discuss their experiences.

97
New cards

Mixed Methods Research

Combines quantitative and qualitative approaches in one study.

98
New cards

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

Participants are randomly allocated to intervention or control groups to test efficacy.

99
New cards

Quasi-Experimental Study

Intervention study without full randomization or control conditions.

100
New cards

Literature Review

Narrative summary of existing research on a topic.